Lemma 8
Tag 00RL, permanent. Cite it as [Bourbaki, Tag 00RL].
Algebra, VIII, p. 307, § 16. Other Descriptions of the Brauer Group
a) For every , and , we have
Card( ).
b) The mapping is an isomorphism of -algebras from L to .
c) Denote by resp. the subalgebra of L (resp. ) of elements invariant under the action of G. Then induces an isomorphism from to .
Since the algebra L is reduced and of finite degree, the intersection of the maximal ideals of L is reduced to 0 (VIII, p. 173, Corollary 2). Moreover, if and are two distinct maximal ideals of L, then we have . By Proposition 10 of I, §8, No. 11, p. 110, the canonical mapping from L to is an isomorphism, as is the canonical mapping from to for every . Assertion a) follows. Since is a partition of , assertion b) follows; assertion c) is an immediate consequence of b).
Let us now fix an orbit and an element of . Set = Coind, and denote by the action of G on . For any , denote by the mapping from G to that sends to . By formula (15) of VIII, p. 305 and the definition of the action of on , it is immediate that belongs to , and the mapping from L to satisfies for . In other words, is a morphism of , G)-algebras.
Bourbaki sets the proof directly after the statement, and the corpus does not separate them, so what is above is the statement and its proof together.
Cited by
Cites
- Proposition 10 of I, §8, No. 11, p. 110 not in this corpus
- VIII, p. 173, Corollary 2
- VIII, p. 305