Let q be the cardinal of K. For any integer m⩾0, set Sm= ∑x∈Kxm. We have Sm=−1 if m is a nonzero multiple of q−1 and Sm=0 in all other cases.
Recall that 00=1 (I, §2, No. 1, p. 14). Suppose that m is a multiple of q−1. Since the abelian group K∗ has order q−1, we have xm=1 for every x∈K∗ and Sm=0m+(q−1)⋅1, which gives the assertion in this case.
Suppose that m is not a multiple of q−1. Set χ(x)=xm for x∈K∗. Since the multiplicative group K∗ is cyclic of order q−1 (V, §12, No. 1, p. 93, Proposition 1), there exists an element a of K∗ such that χ(a)=1. By Lemma 1 applied to G=K∗, we have
Sm=0m+x∈K∗∑χ(x)=0; this gives Lemma 2.
Let us now prove Theorem 1. Let x=(x1,…,xn) be an element of Kn. We have 1−fi(x)q−1=0 if fi(x)=0 and 1−fi(x)q−1=1 if fi(x)=0. Set P=∏i=1r(1−fiq−1). We have
P(x)={10if x∈Z,if x∈/Z. Let us expand the polynomial
P as
∑α∈NncαXα; by assumption, it has degree
<(q−1)n. Let
α be an element of
Nn such that
cα is nonzero. Since we have
α1+⋯+αn<(q−1)n, there exists an integer
ℓ such that
1≤ℓ≤n and
0≤αℓ<q−1. By Lemma 2, we then have
∑x∈Kxαℓ=0, and therefore
x∈Kn∑xα=j=1∏n(x∈K∑xαj)=0. We consequently have
x∈Kn∑P(x)=α∈Nn∑cα(x∈Kn∑xα)=0. Now, by formula (1), we have
∑x∈KnP(x)=Card(Z)⋅1, and therefore
Card(Z)⋅1=0, which means that
Card(Z) is divisible by
p.
Bourbaki sets the proof directly after the statement, and the corpus does not separate them, so what is above is the statement and its proof together.
Nothing.