Bourbaki

Lemma 2

Tag 00LC, permanent. Cite it as [Bourbaki, Tag 00LC].

Algebra, VIII, p. 355, § 18. Simple Algebras over a Finite Field

Let qq be the cardinal of K. For any integer m⩾0m\geqslant 0, set Sm=S_m= ∑x∈Kxm\sum_{x\in K}x^m. We have Sm=−1S_m=-1 if mm is a nonzero multiple of q−1q-1 and Sm=0S_m= 0 in all other cases.

Recall that 00=10^0= 1 (I, §2, No. 1, p. 14). Suppose that mm is a multiple of q−1q-1. Since the abelian group K∗K^* has order q−1q-1, we have xm=1x^m= 1 for every x∈K∗x\in K^* and Sm=0m+(q−1)⋅1S_m= 0^m+ (q-1)\cdot 1, which gives the assertion in this case.

Suppose that mm is not a multiple of q−1q-1. Set χ(x)=xm\chi (x) =x^m for x∈K∗x\in K^*. Since the multiplicative group K∗K^* is cyclic of order q−1q-1 (V, §12, No. 1, p. 93, Proposition 1), there exists an element aa of K∗K^* such that χ(a)≠1\chi(a) \neq 1. By Lemma 1 applied to G=K∗G = K^*, we have

Sm=0m+∑x∈K∗χ(x)=0; S_m = 0^m + \sum_{x \in K^*} \chi(x) = 0;
this gives Lemma 2.

Let us now prove Theorem 1. Let x=(x1,…,xn)\mathbf{x} = (x_1, \ldots, x_n) be an element of KnK^n. We have 1−fi(x)q−1=01 - f_i(\mathbf{x})^{q-1} = 0 if fi(x)≠0f_i(\mathbf{x}) \neq 0 and 1−fi(x)q−1=11 - f_i(\mathbf{x})^{q-1} = 1 if fi(x)=0f_i(\mathbf{x}) = 0. Set P=∏i=1r(1−fiq−1)P = \prod_{i=1}^r (1 - f_i^{q-1}). We have

P(x)={1if x∈Z,0if x∉Z. P(\mathbf{x}) = \begin{cases} 1 & \text{if } \mathbf{x} \in \mathbf{Z}, \\ 0 & \text{if } \mathbf{x} \notin \mathbf{Z}. \end{cases}
Let us expand the polynomial PP as ∑α∈NncαXα\sum_{\alpha \in \mathbf{N}^n} c_\alpha X^\alpha; by assumption, it has degree <(q−1)n< (q-1)n. Let α\alpha be an element of Nn\mathbf{N}^n such that cαc_\alpha is nonzero. Since we have α1+⋯+αn<(q−1)n\alpha_1 + \cdots + \alpha_n < (q-1)n, there exists an integer ℓ\ell such that 1≤ℓ≤n1 \leq \ell \leq n and 0≤αℓ<q−10 \leq \alpha_\ell < q-1. By Lemma 2, we then have ∑x∈Kxαℓ=0\sum_{x \in K} x^{\alpha_\ell} = 0, and therefore
∑x∈Knxα=∏j=1n(∑x∈Kxαj)=0. \sum_{\mathbf{x} \in K^n} \mathbf{x}^\alpha = \prod_{j=1}^n \left( \sum_{x \in K} x^{\alpha_j} \right) = 0.
We consequently have
∑x∈KnP(x)=∑α∈Nncα(∑x∈Knxα)=0. \sum_{\mathbf{x} \in K^n} P(\mathbf{x}) = \sum_{\alpha \in \mathbf{N}^n} c_\alpha \left( \sum_{\mathbf{x} \in K^n} \mathbf{x}^\alpha \right) = 0.
Now, by formula (1), we have ∑x∈KnP(x)=Card⁡(Z)⋅1\sum_{\mathbf{x} \in K^n} P(\mathbf{x}) = \operatorname{Card}(\mathbf{Z}) \cdot 1, and therefore Card⁡(Z)⋅1=0\operatorname{Card}(\mathbf{Z}) \cdot 1 = 0, which means that Card⁡(Z)\operatorname{Card}(\mathbf{Z}) is divisible by pp.

Bourbaki sets the proof directly after the statement, and the corpus does not separate them, so what is above is the statement and its proof together.

Cited by

Nothing.

Cites

Transcribed from the printed edition, 2023, Springer Nature. Not translated.