Bourbaki

Proposition 5

Tag 00M0, permanent. Cite it as [Bourbaki, Tag 00M0].

Algebra, VIII, p. 366, § 19. Quaternion Algebras

The following properties are equivalent:

(i) The quaternion algebra F is a field.

(ii) There is no nonzero element q∈Fq\in F such that TF(q)=NF(q)=0T_F(q) = N_F(q) = 0.

(iii) Every element of F of square zero is zero.

(iv) There does not exist any nonzero vector (x,y,z,t)(x, y, z, t) in K4K^4 such that

x2+βxy−αy2−γ(z2+βzt−αt2)=0 x^2+\beta xy-\alpha y^2-\gamma (z^2+\beta zt-\alpha t^2) = 0

(v) There does not exist any nonzero vector (x,y,z)(x, y, z) in K3K^3 such that

x2+βxy−αy2−γz2=0 x^2+\beta xy-\alpha y^2-\gamma z^2= 0

(vi) The quadratic algebra E is a field, and γ\gamma is not the norm of an element of E.

An element qq of F is invertible if and only if NF(q)N_F(q) is not 0. The equivalence of (i) and (iv) therefore follows from formula (31) of III, §2, No. 5, p. 445; it is clear that (i) implies (iii) and that (iv) implies (v).

The equivalence of (ii) and (iii) follows from Remark 3 of VIII, p. 362.

Suppose that F is not a field. If γ(4α+β2)≠0\gamma (4\alpha +\beta^2)\not= 0, then the algebra F is central simple of degree 4 over K; it is isomorphic to the algebra M2(K)\mathbf{M}_2(K) (VIII, p. 120, Theorem 1) and therefore contains a nonzero element of square zero. If γ=0\gamma = 0, then we have j2=0j^2= 0. If 4α+β2=04\alpha +\beta^2= 0, then we have (2i−β)2=0(2i-\beta )^2= 0 and 2i−β≠02i-\beta \not= 0 if K has characteristic different from 2. Finally, if K has characteristic 2 and β\beta is zero, then we have TF(q)=0T_F(q) = 0 for every q∈Fq\in F (III, §2, No. 5, p. 445, formula (31)). Since F is not a field, there exists a nonzero element qq of F such that NF(q)=0N_F(q) = 0; we have q2=0q^2= 0. This proves the implication (iii)⇒\Rightarrow(i).

Let q=x+yiq=x+yi be an element of E. We have NE/K(q)=x2+βxy−αy2N_{E/K}(q) =x^2+\beta xy-\alpha y^2. Suppose that property (v) holds. We have NE/K(q)−γ≠0N_{E/K}(q)-\gamma \not= 0 and NE/K(q)≠0N_{E/K}(q)\not= 0 if q≠0q\not= 0, and therefore (vi).

Finally, suppose that property (vi) holds. Let qq be a nonzero element of F; we write it as u+vju+vj with uu and vv in E. If vv is zero, then qq is invertible. If vv is not zero, then we have NF(q)=NF(v)NF(v−1u+j)=N_F(q) = N_F(v)N_F(v^{-1}u+j) = NE/K(v)(NE/K(v−1u)−γ)N_{E/K}(v)(N_{E/K}(v^{-1}u)-\gamma ) by III, §2, No. 5, p. 443, formula (24). Since γ\gamma is not a norm, NF(q)N_F(q) is not zero, and qq is invertible.

Bourbaki sets the proof directly after the statement, and the corpus does not separate them, so what is above is the statement and its proof together.

Cited by

Nothing.

Cites

Transcribed from the printed edition, 2023, Springer Nature. Not translated.