Bourbaki

§ 19. Quaternion algebras

In this section, K is a commutative field.

1. General Properties of Quaternion Algebras

Let α,β,γ\alpha , \beta , \gamma be elements of K, and let F be the quaternion algebra of type (α,β,γ)(\alpha , \beta , \gamma ). Recall (III, §2, No. 5, p. 445)[^1] that F is an associative unital K-algebra that has a basis (1,i,j,k)(1, i, j, k) over K satisfying the relations

i2=α+βi,j2=γ,ij=k,ji=βj−k(1) i^2=\alpha +\beta i ,j^2=\gamma ,ij=k ,ji=\beta j-k \tag{1}

It is a Cayley algebra (III, §2, No. 4, p. 441, Definition 1) whose conjugation satisfies

i‾=β−i,j‾=−j,k‾=−k(2) \overline{i}=\beta -i ,\overline{j}=-j ,\overline{k}=-k \tag{2}

Recall that the Cayley trace and norm of F are the mappings TFT_F and NFN_F from F to K defined by TF(q)=q+q‾T_F(q) =q+\overline{q} and NF(q)=qqN_F(q) =qq.

The linear subspace E of F with basis (1,i)(1, i) is a commutative Cayley subalgebra of F; it is a quadratic algebra of type (α,β)(\alpha , \beta ), and F can be identified with the Cayley extension of E defined by γ\gamma (III, §2, No. 5, p. 444). For every z∈Ez\in E, we have zj=jzzj=jz. Every element qq of F can be written uniquely as x+jyx+jy with x,y∈Ex, y\in E, and we have

q‾=x‾−jy,TF(q)=x+x‾,NF(q)=xx−γyy(3) \overline{q}=\overline{x}-jy ,T_F(q) =x+\overline{x},N_F(q) =xx-\gamma yy \tag{3}

Proposition 1 00LQ

The characteristic polynomial of an element qq of F is equal to (X2−TF(q)X+NF(q))2(X^2-T_F(q)X + N_F(q))^2.

Cites 1 · Cited by 1

Cites Proposition 6, III § 9

Cited by Proposition 3

By the above, the algebra F is a free right E-module with basis (1,j)(1, j). Consequently, F[X] is a free right E[X]-module with basis (1,j)(1, j). We denote by uu the endomorphism of the right E[X]-module F[X] defined by u(P)=u(P) = (X−q)P(X-q)P for P∈F[X]P\in F[X]. The characteristic polynomial of qq is the determinant of uu viewed as an endomorphism of the K[X]-module F[X]. By Proposition 6 of III, §9, No. 4, p. 546, it is equal to N(det uu), where N denotes the norm from E[X] to K[X]. Let us write qq as x+jyx+jy with x,y∈Ex, y\in E. The matrix of uu with respect to the basis (1,j)(1, j) is (X−x−γy−yX−x‾)\begin{pmatrix} X-x & -\gamma y \\ -y & X-\overline{x} \end{pmatrix} ; its determinant is equal to D=(X−x)(X−x‾)−γyy=X2−TF(q)X+NF(q)D = (X-x)(X-\overline{x})-\gamma yy= X^2-T_F(q)X + N_F(q) (cf. formula (3)). Since D belongs to K[X], we have N(D)=D2N(D) = D^2; Proposition 1 follows.

Remark 1 00LR

Suppose that the characteristic of K is different from 2, and set i′=2i−βi'= 2i-\beta. Then (1,i′)(1, i') is a basis of E over K, and we have i′2=4α+β2{i'}^2= 4\alpha +\beta^2. It follows that E is isomorphic to the quadratic algebra of type (4α+β2,0)(4\alpha +\beta^2,0) and F to the quaternion algebra of type (4α+β2,0,γ)(4\alpha +\beta^2,0, \gamma ).

Cited by 1

Cited by Example

Remark 2 00LS

The quaternion algebra of type (α,0,γ)(\alpha ,0, \gamma ) is isomorphic to the quaternion algebra of type (γ,0,α)(\gamma ,0, \alpha ) (III, §2, No. 5, p. 445). It is also isomorphic to the quaternion algebra of type (αa2,0,γc2)(\alpha a^2,0, \gamma c^2) for every pair (a,c)(a, c) of nonzero elements of K.

Cites 1 · Cited by 1

Cites III § 2. Examples of algebras

Cited by Theorem 1

Remark 3 00LT

Let qq be an element of F. Then qq is nilpotent if and only if its characteristic polynomial is equal to X4X^4, that is, TF(q)=NF(q)=0T_F(q) = N_F(q) = 0; we then have q2=0q^2= 0.

Cited by 2

Cited by Proposition 3, Proposition 5

Example 00LU

The matrix algebra M2(K)\mathbf{M}_2(K) is isomorphic to the quaternion algebra of type (0,1,1)(0,1,1). Indeed, consider the quadratic algebra E=K×KE = K\times K (of type (0,1)(0,1)) and the quaternion algebra F=E+EjF = E + Ej, which is the Cayley extension of E defined by the element γ=1\gamma = 1. The mapping (a,b)↦(a00b)(a, b)\mapsto \begin{pmatrix} a & 0 \\ 0 & b \end{pmatrix} is an algebra homomorphism from E to M2(K)\mathbf{M}_2(K). Since for a,ba, b in K, we have

(01)((01)(10)(01)((a0)(b0)((01) (01)((01)(10)(01)((a0)(b0)((01)

=, =,

1 0 1 0 0 1 1 0 0 bb 0 aa 1 0

this homomorphism extends to an algebra homomorphism θ:F⟶M2(K)\theta : F\longrightarrow \mathbf{M}_2(K) defined by

(ac) (ac)
θ((a,b)+(c,d)j)= \theta ((a, b) + (c, d)j)=
db db

This homomorphism is bijective. When the characteristic of K is different from 2, the algebra M2(K)\mathbf{M}_2(K) is also isomorphic to the quaternion algebra of type (1,0,1)(1,0,1) (Remark 1).

Cites 1

Cites Remark 1

2. The Center of a Quaternion Algebra

Let α,β,γ\alpha ,\beta ,\gamma be elements of K, and let F be the quaternion algebra of type (α,β,γ)(\alpha , \beta , \gamma ).

Proposition 2 00LV

a) Suppose that the field K has characteristic different from 2. If γ\gamma or 4α+β24\alpha +\beta^2 is nonzero, then the center of F is equal to K; otherwise, it has dimension 2 and is generated by 1 and ij−jiij-ji.

Cites 1 · Cited by 3

Cites III § 2. Examples of algebras

Cited by § 19. Quaternion Algebras, Remark, Proposition 3

b) Suppose that the field K has characteristic 2. If β≠0\beta \not= 0, then the center of F is equal to K; if β=0\beta = 0, then the algebra F is commutative.

By formula (30) of III, §2, No. 5, p. 444, we have

ij−ji=−βj+2k,jk−kj=βγ−2γi,ki−ik=−2αj−βk(4) ij-ji=-\beta j+ 2k ,jk-kj=\beta \gamma -2\gamma i ,ki-ik=-2\alpha j-\beta k \tag{4}

An element q=x+yi+zj+tkq=x+yi+zj+tk of F is central if and only if it commutes with ii and jj, that is, we have

(5) 2z+βt=−βz+2αt=02z+\beta t=-\beta z+ 2\alpha t= 0 and 2γt=βγt=2y=βy=02\gamma t=\beta \gamma t= 2y=\beta y= 0.

First suppose that the characteristic of K is different from 2. If γ\gamma is nonzero, then the equalities in (5) imply y=t=0y=t= 0 and then z=0z= 0; consequently, we have q∈Kq\in K. If γ=0\gamma = 0 and 4α+β2≠04\alpha +\beta^2\not= 0, then they imply y=z=t=0y=z=t= 0, so we have q∈Kq\in K. If γ=4α+β2=0\gamma = 4\alpha +\beta^2= 0, then the system (5) reduces to y=2z+βt=0y= 2z+\beta t= 0, so we have q=x+t/2(ij−ji)q=x+t/2(ij-ji), which completes the proof of a).

Now suppose that the field K has characteristic 2. The system (5) can then be written as βt=βz=βy=0\beta t=\beta z=\beta y= 0; assertion b) follows.

3. Simplicity of Quaternion Algebras

Proposition 3 00LW

Let α,β,γ\alpha ,\beta ,\gamma be elements of K, and let ff be a quaternion algebra of type (α,β,γ)(\alpha , \beta , \gamma ). Denote its Cayley trace and norm by TFT_F and NFN_F. The following properties are equivalent:

Cites 8

Cites Definition 2, VIII § 17, Proposition 5, VIII § 17, Proposition 1, III § 2. Examples of algebras, Lemma 1, V § 8, Remark 3, Proposition 2, Definition 1, VIII § 17

(i) The algebra F is central simple.

(ii) For every nonzero element xx of F, there exists an element yy in F such that TF(xy)≠0T_F(xy)\not= 0.

(iii) We have (4α+β2)γ≠0(4\alpha +\beta^2)\gamma \not= 0.

Suppose that these properties hold. Then for every xx in F, the reduced characteristic polynomial of xx is X2−TF(x)X+NF(x)X^2-T_F(x)X + N_F(x). In particular, TF(x)T_F(x) is the reduced trace of xx, and NF(x)N_F(x) is its reduced norm.

(i)⇒(ii): If the algebra F is central simple, then it follows from Proposition 1 of VIII, p. 361 and the definition of the reduced trace (VIII, p. 340, Definition 2) that TFT_F is its reduced trace; assertion (ii) follows (VIII, p. 343, Proposition 5).

(ii)⇔(iii): Let (ei)1≤i≤4(e_i)_{1 \leq i \leq 4} be a basis of F of type (α,β,γ)(\alpha, \beta, \gamma) (III, §2, No. 5, p. 445). The matrix (TF(eiej))(T_F(e_i e_j)) is equal to

(2β00β2α+β200002γβγ00βγ−2αγ). \begin{pmatrix} 2 & \beta & 0 & 0 \\ \beta & 2\alpha + \beta^2 & 0 & 0 \\ 0 & 0 & 2\gamma & \beta\gamma \\ 0 & 0 & \beta\gamma & -2\alpha\gamma \end{pmatrix}.

Its determinant is −γ2(4α+β2)2-\gamma^2 (4\alpha + \beta^2)^2. The equivalence of properties (ii) and (iii) follows from V, §8, No. 2, p. 49, Lemma 1.

(iii)⇒(i): Suppose (4α+β2)γ≠0(4\alpha + \beta^2)\gamma \neq 0. We then have γ≠0\gamma \neq 0, and we have β≠0\beta \neq 0 if K has characteristic 2. By Proposition 2, the algebra F is central. Let x be an element of the Jacobson radical of F. For every y∈Fy \in F, xyxy is nilpotent, so TF(xy)=0T_F(xy) = 0 (Remark 3 of VIII, p. 362). Since (ii) is equivalent to (iii), we have x=0x = 0. This proves that F is a semisimple K-algebra. Since its center is K, it is simple.

The last assertion follows from Proposition 1 of VIII, p. 361 and the definition of the reduced characteristic polynomial (VIII, p. 340, Definition 1).

Denote the characteristic of K by p. By Proposition 3, if p≠2p \neq 2, then every quaternion algebra over K of type (α,0,γ)(\alpha, 0, \gamma) with α\alpha and γ\gamma in K∗K^* is central simple. If p=2p = 2, then every quaternion algebra of type (α,1,γ)(\alpha, 1, \gamma) with α∈K\alpha \in K and γ∈K∗\gamma \in K^* is central simple. Conversely, we have the following.

Proposition 4 00LX

Let A be a central simple algebra of degree 4 over K. Denote the characteristic of K by p.

Cites 5 · Cited by 2

Cites III § 2. Examples of algebras, Corollary 2, VIII § 14, Corollary 1, VIII § 14, § 19. Quaternion Algebras, Theorem 1 (Wedderburn), VIII § 7

Cited by Corollary 1, Theorem 1

a) If p≠2p \neq 2, then there exist nonzero elements α\alpha and γ\gamma of K such that the algebra A is isomorphic to the quaternion algebra of type (α,0,γ)(\alpha, 0, \gamma).

b) If p=2p = 2, then there exist an element α\alpha of K and an element γ\gamma of K∗K^* such that the algebra A is isomorphic to the quaternion algebra of type (α,1,γ)(\alpha, 1, \gamma).

By Wedderburn's theorem (VIII, p. 120, Theorem 1), there exist an integer r≥1r \geq 1 and a field D with center K such that A is isomorphic to Mr(D)\mathbf{M}_r(D). We then have r2[D:K]=[A:K]=4r^2[D : K] = [A : K] = 4. If r=2r = 2, then A is isomorphic to M2(K)\mathbf{M}_2(K), and Proposition 4 follows from the example of VIII, p. 362. Otherwise, we have r=1r = 1, and A is a field with center K. It then has a maximal commutative subfield E that is a separable extension of K; since A has degree 4 over K, the extension E has degree 2 over K (VIII, p. 265, Corollary 2). It is therefore quadratic (III, §2, No. 3, p. 439). Let ss be the conjugation of E (III, §2, No. 3, p. 440). By the Skolem–Noether theorem (VIII, p. 256, Corollary 1), there exists an invertible element jj of A such that we have s(x)=jxj−1s(x) =jxj^{-1} for every xx in E. The field E is separable over K, so we have s≠s\not= IdE_E, so that j∉Ej \notin E. Since A is a vector space of dimension 4 over K, it is a left vector space of dimension 2 over E, so we have A=E⊕EjA = E\oplus Ej. We have s2=s^2= IdE_E, so the element j2j^2 of A belongs to the center of A; hence there exists an element γ\gamma of K∗K^* such that j2=γj^2=\gamma.

When p≠2p\not= 2, there exist an element ii of E and an element α∈K∗\alpha \in K^* such that E=K(i)E = K(i) and i2=αi^2=\alpha (V, §11, No. 9, p. 93, Example 3); in this case, A is isomorphic to the quaternion algebra of type (α,0,γ)(\alpha ,0, \gamma ). When p=2p= 2, there exist an element ii of E and an element α\alpha of K such that E=K(i)E = K(i) and i2=i+αi^2=i+\alpha (V, §11, No. 9, p. 93, Example 2), so that A is isomorphic to the quaternion algebra of type (α,1,γ)(\alpha ,1, \gamma ).

Corollary 1 00LY

Let A be a central simple K-algebra of finite degree >1>1 whose elements are all algebraic of degree ⩽2\leqslant 2 over K. Then A is isomorphic to a quaternion algebra over K.

Cites 6 · Cited by 1

Cites Proposition 7, V § 7, Proposition 3, VIII § 14, Proposition 4, VIII § 14, Corollary 2, VIII § 18, § 19. Quaternion Algebras, Proposition 4

Cited by Corollary 2

If K is finite, then the algebra A is isomorphic to a matrix algebra Mn(K)\mathbf{M}_n(K) (VIII, p. 357, Corollary 2) and therefore contains elements of degree nn over K; the assumption implies n=2n= 2 and therefore the result in this case (VIII, p. 362, Example). Suppose that the field K is infinite. Let L be a maximal étale subalgebra of A. By V, §7, No. 4, p. 41, Proposition 7, there exists an element xx of A such that the K-algebra L is equal to K[x]K[x], hence by assumption has degree ⩽2\leqslant 2. Since we have [A:K]=[L:K]2[A : K] = [L : K]^2 (VIII, p. 264, Proposition 4 and p. 262, Proposition 3), we conclude that [A : K] = 4. Corollary 1 then follows from Proposition 4.

Corollary 2 00LZ

Let (E,s)(E, s) be a Cayley algebra over K such that the K-algebra E is central simple of finite degree >1>1 over K. Then E is isomorphic to a quaternion algebra over K.

Cites 1

Cites Corollary 1

Every element uu of E satisfies u2−TE(u)u+NE(u)=0u^2-T_E(u)u+ N_E(u) = 0, so the K-algebra E is isomorphic to a quaternion algebra (Corollary 1).

4. Criteria for a Quaternion Algebra to Be a Field

Let α,β,γ\alpha , \beta , \gamma be elements of the field K, and let F be the quaternion algebra of type (α,β,γ)(\alpha , \beta , \gamma ). As in No.1, we denote the canonical basis of F by (1,i,j,k)(1, i, j, k) and the subalgebra K+KiK + Ki of F by E.

Proposition 5 00M0

The following properties are equivalent:

Cites 3

Cites III § 2. Examples of algebras, Remark 3, Theorem 1 (Wedderburn), VIII § 7

(i) The quaternion algebra F is a field.

(ii) There is no nonzero element q∈Fq\in F such that TF(q)=NF(q)=0T_F(q) = N_F(q) = 0.

(iii) Every element of F of square zero is zero.

(iv) There does not exist any nonzero vector (x,y,z,t)(x, y, z, t) in K4K^4 such that

x2+βxy−αy2−γ(z2+βzt−αt2)=0 x^2+\beta xy-\alpha y^2-\gamma (z^2+\beta zt-\alpha t^2) = 0

(v) There does not exist any nonzero vector (x,y,z)(x, y, z) in K3K^3 such that

x2+βxy−αy2−γz2=0 x^2+\beta xy-\alpha y^2-\gamma z^2= 0

(vi) The quadratic algebra E is a field, and γ\gamma is not the norm of an element of E.

An element qq of F is invertible if and only if NF(q)N_F(q) is not 0. The equivalence of (i) and (iv) therefore follows from formula (31) of III, §2, No. 5, p. 445; it is clear that (i) implies (iii) and that (iv) implies (v).

The equivalence of (ii) and (iii) follows from Remark 3 of VIII, p. 362.

Suppose that F is not a field. If γ(4α+β2)≠0\gamma (4\alpha +\beta^2)\not= 0, then the algebra F is central simple of degree 4 over K; it is isomorphic to the algebra M2(K)\mathbf{M}_2(K) (VIII, p. 120, Theorem 1) and therefore contains a nonzero element of square zero. If γ=0\gamma = 0, then we have j2=0j^2= 0. If 4α+β2=04\alpha +\beta^2= 0, then we have (2i−β)2=0(2i-\beta )^2= 0 and 2i−β≠02i-\beta \not= 0 if K has characteristic different from 2. Finally, if K has characteristic 2 and β\beta is zero, then we have TF(q)=0T_F(q) = 0 for every q∈Fq\in F (III, §2, No. 5, p. 445, formula (31)). Since F is not a field, there exists a nonzero element qq of F such that NF(q)=0N_F(q) = 0; we have q2=0q^2= 0. This proves the implication (iii)⇒\Rightarrow(i).

Let q=x+yiq=x+yi be an element of E. We have NE/K(q)=x2+βxy−αy2N_{E/K}(q) =x^2+\beta xy-\alpha y^2. Suppose that property (v) holds. We have NE/K(q)−γ≠0N_{E/K}(q)-\gamma \not= 0 and NE/K(q)≠0N_{E/K}(q)\not= 0 if q≠0q\not= 0, and therefore (vi).

Finally, suppose that property (vi) holds. Let qq be a nonzero element of F; we write it as u+vju+vj with uu and vv in E. If vv is zero, then qq is invertible. If vv is not zero, then we have NF(q)=NF(v)NF(v−1u+j)=N_F(q) = N_F(v)N_F(v^{-1}u+j) = NE/K(v)(NE/K(v−1u)−γ)N_{E/K}(v)(N_{E/K}(v^{-1}u)-\gamma ) by III, §2, No. 5, p. 443, formula (24). Since γ\gamma is not a norm, NF(q)N_F(q) is not zero, and qq is invertible.

Remark 00RQ

Suppose that the quaternion algebra F is a field. It follows from the equality j2=γj^2=\gamma that we have γ≠0\gamma \not= 0. By Proposition 2 of VIII, p. 363, the center of F is equal to K unless K has characteristic 2 and β\beta is zero, in which case the algebra F is commutative.

Cites 1

Cites Proposition 2

5. Algebras over Maximal Ordered Fields

Let R be a maximal ordered field (VI, §2, No. 5, p. 25). Let C be the quadratic R-algebra of type (−1,0)(-1,0); if (1,i)(1, i) is its canonical basis, then we have i2=−1i^2=-1. Moreover, C is an algebraic closure of R (VI, §2, No. 6, p. 26, Theorem 3). Let H be the quaternion R-algebra of type (−1,0,−1)(-1,0,-1). The multiplication table of H in its canonical basis (1,i,j,k)(1, i, j, k) is given by

i2=j2=k2=−1,ij=−ji=k,−ik=ki=j,jk=−kj=i i^2=j^2=k^2=-1,ij=-ji=k,-ik=ki=j ,jk=-kj=i

We identify C with the subalgebra R+RiR + Ri of H. The conjugate of an element q=x+yi+zj+tkq=x+yi+zj+tk of H is q‾=x−yi−zj−tk\overline{q}=x-yi-zj-tk. The Cayley trace and norm of qq are given by

T(q)=q+q‾=2x,N(q)=qq=x2+y2+z2+t2 T(q) =q+\overline{q}= 2x ,N(q) =qq=x^2+y^2+z^2+t^2

Since R is an ordered field, we have N(q)>0N(q)>0 if q≠0q\not= 0, so H is a field, with center R (VIII, p. 363, Proposition 2). The reduced trace and norm of an element qq of H are T(q)T(q) and N(q)N(q), respectively.

Theorem 1 00M1

Let D be an R-algebra of finite degree that is a field. Then D is isomorphic to R, C, or H.

Cites 3 · Cited by 1

Cites Corollary 2, VIII § 14, Remark 2, Proposition 4

Cited by VIII § 15. Brauer Groups

Denote the center of D by Z, and let L be a maximal commutative subfield of D. We have [D:Z]=[L:Z]2[D : Z] = [L : Z]^2 by VIII, p. 265, Corollary 2; we also have [L:R]⩽2[L : R]\leqslant 2 because C is an algebraic closure of R. There are consequently three possible cases:

a) We have R = Z = L, so [D : Z] = 1 and D = R.

b) We have R≠ZR\not= Z and Z = L, so [D : Z] = 1 and D = L. In this case, D is isomorphic to C.

c) We have R = Z and [L : R] = 2, so [D : R] = 4. By Proposition 4 of VIII, p. 364, the R-algebra D is isomorphic to a quaternion algebra of type (α,0,γ)(\alpha ,0, \gamma ), where α\alpha and γ\gamma are nonzero elements of R. Let i∈Di\in D- Z be such that i2=αi^2=\alpha. We have α≠0\alpha \not= 0. If α>0\alpha >0, then there exists an a∈Ra\in R such that a2=αa^2=\alpha (VI, §2, No. 6, p. 26, Theorem 3); we then have (a−i)(a+i)=0(a-i)(a+i) = 0, which is absurd because D is a field. So we have α<0\alpha <0. The inequality γ<0\gamma <0 is shown analogously. There then exist elements aa and cc of R∗R^* such that α=−a2\alpha =-a^2 and γ=−c2\gamma =-c^2 (loc. cit.). The algebra D is therefore isomorphic to the quaternion algebra of type (−1,0,−1)(-1,0,-1) (VIII, p. 362, Remark 2), that is, to H.

Remark 1 00M2

Let O be the octonion algebra of type (−1,0,−1,−1)(-1,0,-1,-1) over R (III, Appendix, No. 3, p. 615). Let D be an alternative Cayley algebra over R such that every nonzero element of D has an inverse. We can prove (VIII, p. 370, Exercise 5) that D is isomorphic to R, C, H, or O.

Cites 2 · Cited by 1

Cites III App. 0. Alternative algebras. Octonions, Exercise 5, § 19

Cited by Exercise 5, § 19

Remark 2 00M3

The above applies to the field R\mathbf{R} of real numbers. Every R\mathbf{R}-algebra of finite degree that is a field is isomorphic to R,C\mathbf{R},\mathbf{C}, or H\mathbf{H}.

Remark 3 00M4

Let A be a normed algebra over the field R\mathbf{R}. Suppose that A is a field. Then A is isomorphic to R,C\mathbf{R},\mathbf{C}, or H\mathbf{H} (“Gelfand–Mazur theorem”) (cf. Comm. Alg., VI, §6, No. 4, p. 407, Theorem 1 and TS, I, §2, no5^o5, p. 26, corollaire 22).∗.*

Exercises

See the exercises for § 19.

[^1]: In the case when β=0\beta = 0, it is also said that F is a quaternion algebra of type (α,γ)(\alpha , \gamma ).

Transcribed from the printed edition, 2023, Springer Nature. Not translated.