§ 17. Reduced norms and traces
In this section, K is a commutative field and A a central simple K-algebra of finite degree. We denote the reduced degree of A by .
1. Complements on Characteristic Polynomials
Let L be a commutative ring and M a free L-module of finite rank . If is an endomorphism of M and a natural number, then we denote by the trace of the endomorphism of the free L-module . In particular, we have
(1) Tr() det(),
and for . By Proposition 7 of III, §8, No. 4, p. 527, the mapping det() from End(M) to L is a homogeneous polynomial mapping of degree (IV, §5, No. 9, p. 55). More generally, for every integer such that , the mapping from End(M) to L is a homogeneous polynomial mapping of degree ; this follows from Proposition 10 of III, §8, No. 5, p. 529.
Let be an endomorphism of M and the endomorphism of the L[X]module deduced from by extension of scalars (II, §5, No. 1, p. 277). Recall (III, §8, No. 11, p. 541, Definition 3 and (50)) that the characteristic polynomial of is the determinant of the L[X]endomorphism of M[X] and that we have the relation
Proposition 1 00KD
Let L be a commutative ring, M a free L-module of finite rank m , and u an endomorphism of M. There exists a unique endomorphism of M satisfying the relation
for and . Moreover, we have the relations
Lemma 1 00KE
Let p be an integer such that . For any w in , let be the linear mapping from to . The linear mapping from to is an isomorphism.
Let be a basis of M; we endow the set I with a total order. For any subset J of I, set , where is the sequence of elements of J in increasing order. The L-module admits as a basis the elements , where S runs through the set of subsets of I with elements; has as a basis. Consequently, there exists a basis of consisting of linear mappings characterized by the formula
where J runs through the set of subsets of I with p elements. It follows from formula (20) of III, §7, No. 8, p. 519 that for every subset J of I with p elements, we have ; since the elements form a basis of , the linear mapping is bijective.
Let us now prove Proposition 1. Let u and be endomorphisms of M. Relation (3) is equivalent to
the mapping is an isomorphism from M to by Lemma 1. Consequently, for every endomorphism u of M, there exists a unique endomorphism of M satisfying relation (3).
Let be elements of M. Let us replace with and with in (3); we obtain
det().
Consequently, (det()), which gives the relation det() by Lemma 1.
We denote by U the endomorphism of the L[X]-module M[X] (VIII, p. 335). By the above applied to U, there exists an endomorphism of the L[X]-module M[X] that satisfies the relations
for in M and
(10) det(X ).
Let us view as an element of End(M)[X] (VIII, p. 9); by formula (9) and Lemma 1, it has degree , so we can write it as
where the are endomorphisms of M. By formula (2), relation (10) gives the equality
in the ring End(M)[X]. By identifying the coefficients of the monomials in X on each side, we obtain the relations
(13) for
and
From this, we deduce
Now, when we identify the constant terms, equalities (9) and (11) imply ; formula (6) follows.
In particular, belongs to the subalgebra of End(M) generated by and therefore commutes with . We have already established the relation det(); formula (4) follows.
Finally, let be elements of M. We replace with and with in formula (3). This gives
= det()
and therefore formula (5).
Remark 1 00KF
The endomorphism of M coincides with what we called the cotranspose of in III, §8, No. 6, p. 532.
Remark 2 00KG
From formulas (1), (2), (4), and (6), we deduce the relation and therefore another proof of the Cayley–Hamilton theorem (III, §8, No. 11, p. 541).
Remark 3 00KH
Since the mapping from End(M) to L is a homogeneous polynomial mapping of degree for , it follows from formula (6) that the mapping from End(M) to End(M) is a homogeneous polynomial mapping of degree .
Let B be an algebra over the ring L; suppose that B is a free L-module of rank , and identify L with the subring of B. Let be an element of B. We apply the above to the endomorphism of the L-module B. Set for ; we have, in particular, (III, §9, No. 3, p. 543). The characteristic polynomial of (loc. cit.) can be written as
(16) Pc.
Since the mapping from B to End is L-linear, the mapping from B to L is a homogeneous polynomial mapping of degree . In particular, the mapping from B to L is a homogeneous polynomial mapping of degree .
For any element of B, set
By Proposition 1, the linear mapping from B to B is the cotranspose of the mapping ; from this, we deduce
Moreover, the mapping from B to B is a homogeneous polynomial mapping of degree .
2. Reduced Norms and Traces
Recall that we denote by A a central simple algebra over the commutative field K of reduced degree .
Proposition 2 00KI
Let be an element of A and Pc() its characteristic polynomial. There exists a unique monic polynomial P in K[X] such that we have Pc() .
A) The uniqueness of P follows from Lemma 2 below.
Lemma 2 00KJ
Let P and Q be monic polynomials in K[X] and is a strictly positive integer. If , then we have P = Q.
Let be the set of irreducible monic polynomials in K[X]. Since P and Q are monic, there exist elements and of such that we have and . It follows from the equality and the uniqueness of the decomposition into irreducible factors that we have for every . Since is strictly positive, we consequently have for every , and therefore P = Q.
B) Let us now prove the existence of P.
By Theorem 1 of VIII, p. 252, there exist a Galois extension L of K of finite degree and an isomorphism of L-algebras . By formula (12) of III, §9, No. 1, p. 542, the polynomial Pc() is also the characteristic polynomial of the element of the L-algebra , hence of the element of the L-algebra .
Set P(X) = det(X); it is a monic polynomial in L[X]. By Example 3 of III, §9, No. 3, p. 545, we have
(19) Pc() .
Let G be the Galois group of L over K. For , denote by the automorphism of the ring L[X] that coincides with on L and fixes X. Then K[X] is the set of polynomials Q of L[X] such that we have for every (V, §10, No. 1, p. 56, Theorem 1). Since the polynomial Pc() belongs to K[X], we have for every . By Lemma 2, we therefore have for every , so P belongs to K[X].
Definition 1 00RM
Let be an element of the algebra A. The reduced characteristic polynomial of (with respect to A) is the unique monic polynomial in K[X], denoted by Pcrd, that satisfies the relation
(20) Pc Pcrd.
Let be an element of A. Since A has degree over K, the polynomial Pc has degree , so Pcrd is a monic polynomial of degree ; let us write it as
(21) Pcrd.
We set
(22) Trd, Nrd.
Definition 2 00KK
We call Trd the reduced trace of A and Nrd its reduced norm (with respect to the K-algebra A).
When there is no risk of confusion, we leave A and K out of the notation and simply write Pcrd(), Trd(), and Nrd().
The following formulas result from formulas (20) and (22) and formulas (7) and (8) of III, §9, No. 1, p. 542:
(23) Tr Trd,
(24) (Nrd).
Proposition 3 00KL
An element of A is invertible if and only if its reduced norm is nonzero. In particular, A is a field if and only if we have Nrd for every nonzero element of A.
An element of A is invertible if and only if its norm is nonzero (III, §9, No. 4, p. 545, Proposition 3). Proposition 3 therefore follows from formula (24).
Remark 00KM
Let L be the field K(X) of rational fractions in one variable X. The reduced characteristic polynomial of an element of A is simply the reduced norm of the element of the L-algebra . This follows from the definition of the reduced characteristic polynomial and the formula (III, §9, No. 3, p. 544)
(25) Pc.
Example 1 00RN
By Theorem 1 of VIII, p. 120, there exist an integer and a field D such that A is isomorphic to . Let be the reduced degree of D over K; we have . Let M be an A-module of finite length ; we will prove the formula
(26) Pc Pcrd
for every element of A. The A-module has length (VIII, p. 121, Lemma 2). The A-modules and have the same length, so they are isomorphic, and we have
Pc Pc
by formula (15) of III, §9, No. 2, p. 542. Since we have , formula (26) follows from formula (20) and Lemma 2 (VIII, p. 339).
Example 2 00RO
Consider the specific case when A is the algebra End of endomorphisms of a finite-dimensional K-vector space V. Taking M to be the simple A-module V, we obtain the relations
Pcrd,
(27) Nrd det(),
Trd Tr()
for every endomorphism of V.
3. Properties of Reduced Norms and Traces
Proposition 4 00KN
Let L be an extension of K and an element of the central simple algebra A. We have the relations
(28) Pcrd Pcrd,
(29) Trd Trd,
(30) Nrd Nrd
(“invariance under extension of scalars”).
The two sides of equality (28) have the same -th power by the definition (formula (20) of VIII, p. 340) and the relation
Pc Pc (III, §9, No. 3, p. 544, formula (21)). Equality (28) therefore follows from Lemma 2 of VIII, p. 339. Formulas (29) and (30) follow from (28), (21), and (22).
Corollary 1 00KO
Let L be an extension of K. Let V be a vector space of dimension over L and a K-algebra homomorphism from A to End. For every element of A, we have
(31) Pcrd,
(32) Trd Tr(),
(33) Nrd det().
Let be the L-algebra homomorphism from to End such that for and . The algebra is simple by Corollary 2 of VIII, p. 222; the homomorphism is therefore injective. But the algebras and End over the field L have the same degree, equal to , so is an isomorphism. Corollary 1 then follows from Proposition 4 and Example 2 above.
Corollary 2 00KP
Let and be elements of A and an element of K. We have the relations
(34) Pcrd,
(35) Pcrd Pcrd,
(36) Trd Trd Trd,
Trd Trd,
(37) Trd Trd,
(38) Nrd Nrd Nrd,
Nrd Nrd,
(39) Trd, Nrd.
Since A is central simple and has reduced degree over K, there exist an extension L of K and a vector space V of dimension over L such that is isomorphic to the algebra End (VIII, p. 252, Theorem 1). Corollary 2 then follows from Corollary 1 and the properties of the trace and determinant of an endomorphism. In particular, formula (34) follows from the Cayley– Hamilton theorem (III, §8, No. 11, p. 541, Proposition 20, cf. also VIII, p. 338, Remark 2).
Corollary 3 00RP
Let be the opposite algebra of A. For every in A, we have
(40) Pcrd Pcrd,
(41) Trd Trd,
(42) Nrd Nrd.
Choose an extension L of K, a vector space V of dimension over L, and a homomorphism from A to End (VIII, p. 252, Theorem 1). Let be the dual vector space of V. The mapping that sends an element of A to the endomorphism of is a K-algebra homomorphism from to End. Corollary 3 then follows from Corollary 1 and Corollary 3 of III, §8, No. 4, p. 528.
The trace, norm, and characteristic polynomial of are therefore the same whether we view as an element of A or as an element of . This property does not always hold when A is not assumed central simple (III, §9, p. 644, Exercise 1).
Proposition 5 00KQ
For any in A, let be the linear form Trd on A.
a) The mapping is an isomorphism of -bimodules from A to its dual Hom.
b) Let be a linear form on A. The following properties are equivalent:
(i) There exists an element of K such that Trd
for every .
(ii) We have for all in A.
Recall (II, §1, No. 14, p. 225–226) that the , A)-bimodule structure on Hom is defined by the relation
for and . In particular, for every in A, we have
Trd,
Trd,
and these two elements are equal by formula (37) of VIII, p. 342. We therefore have , which means that is a homomorphism of , A)-bimodules from A to .
We choose an extension L of the field K and an isomorphism from the L-algebra to the matrix algebra (VIII, p. 252, Theorem 1). We identify the vector space with the dual of the vector space over the field L. By Proposition 4 of VIII, p. 341, with these conventions, we have
(44) Trd Trd.
Let be the L-linear mapping from to deduced from by extension of scalars; by formula (44) and Corollary 1, we have
(45) Trd Tr()
for in . By Proposition 7 of II, §10, No. 11, p. 358, the mapping is bijective; it follows that is bijective. We have proved a).
Let be in ; by the above, there exists an element of A such that is equal to . By a), we have
Consequently, the relation “ for in A” is equivalent to “ for every A”, and by part a) of the proof, this means that belongs to the center K of A. This proves b) in view of formula (36).
Corollary 00KR
The linear subspace of A generated by the elements of the form , where and run through A, is a hyperplane, the kernel of the nonzero linear form Trd.
Remark 00KS
By formula (23) of VIII, p. 340, we have
Tr Trd
for every . If the characteristic of the field K is equal to 0 or a prime number that does not divide , then we can replace the reduced trace with the trace in Proposition 5. On the other hand, if the characteristic of K is a prime number that divides , then we have Tr for every .
4. The Reduced Norm is a Polynomial Function
Lemma 3 00KT
Let L be an extension of K, and let I be a set and a family of variables. We have .
Let P and Q be elements of with . The coefficients of the polynomials R in such that P = QR are the solutions of a system of linear equations with coefficients in K. Consequently, if there exists a polynomial such that P = QR, then there also exists one in (II, §8, No. 5, p. 321, Proposition 6). This proves the inclusion ; the reverse inclusion is obvious.
Recall that the reduced characteristic polynomial of an element of A can be written as
(46) Pcrd
and that we have
Trd Nrd.
Proposition 6 00KU
For every integer such that , the mapping from A to K is a homogeneous polynomial mapping of degree . In particular, the reduced norm is a homogeneous polynomial mapping of degree from A to K.
Let be a basis of A over K and a family of variables.
Lemma 4 00KV
Let be the element of the central simple -algebra . Let P be the reduced characteristic polynomial of . Then P belongs to the ring ; viewed as an element of the ring , it is homogeneous of degree .
We choose an extension L of K and an L-algebra isomorphism from to . We denote by the isomorphism of -algebras deduced from by extension of scalars. By Corollary 1 of VIII, p. 342, we have
(47) det(X) det.
Since the matrices belong to (L), this formula shows that P is a homogeneous polynomial of degree in . It also belongs to and can be written as , where each belongs to the intersection . By Lemma 3, each of the elements belongs to ; Lemma 4 follows.
Lemma 5 00KW
For every extension of K and every element of , we have
(48) Pcrd.
Let be the unique K-algebra homomorphism that sends to for every ; it defines on the structure of a ]-algebra. The -algebra can be identified with (transitivity of extension of scalars), where the element is identified with the element of . We denote by the K-algebra homomorphism deduced from . By formula (21) of III, §9, No. 3, p. 544, the characteristic polynomial of with respect to the -algebra is the image by of the characteristic polynomial of with respect to the ]-algebra , that is, of . In other words, we have
(49) Pc;
Lemma 5 then follows from Lemma 2 of VIII, p. 339.
Consider the specific case of Lemma 5. We have
(50) Pcrd
for every element of . Since the polynomial P in is homogeneous of degree , it can be expanded uniquely as
where is a homogeneous polynomial of degree in . By formulas (46), (50), and (51), we have
for every element of . Proposition 6 follows.
Remark 00KX
Let be a commutative K-algebra. Every element of can be written as , where . It follows from the proof of Lemma 5 that the characteristic polynomial Pc is equal to .
5. Transitivity of Reduced Norms and Traces
Proposition 7 00KY
Let L be a maximal commutative semisimple subalgebra of A and an element of L. We have
(52) Pcrd Pc,
(53) Trd Tr,
(54) Nrd.
By Proposition 3 of VIII, p. 262, the L-modules A and are isomorphic; we therefore have the relation
Pc Pc.
Since the polynomial Pc is monic, it is therefore equal to the reduced characteristic polynomial Pcrd (VIII, p. 339, Lemma 2); this gives formula (52). By comparing the coefficients of (resp. the constant terms) on each side of (52), we obtain formula (53) (resp. (54)).
Corollary 00KZ
Let D be a field of finite degree over K with center K. Let be an element of K and L a maximal commutative subfield of D containing . We have
Pcrd Pc,
(55) Tr Tr,
Nrd.
Indeed, a maximal commutative subfield L of D is a maximal commutative semisimple subalgebra of D by Corollary 2 of VIII, p. 265.
Proposition 8 00L0
Let B be a simple subalgebra of A. Denote the center of B by L and the commutant of B in A by . Then is a central simple algebra over the field L; we denote its reduced degree by . For every element of B, we have the relations
(56) Pcrd(Pcrd),
(57) Trd Tr(Trd),
(58) Nrd(Nrd).
a monic polynomial with coefficients in . Then the polynomial Q = in K[X] is monic of degree , the coefficient of in Q(X) is equal to Tr, and the constant term of Q is .
We denote the -algebra by and the canonical class of T in by . The sequence is a basis of over , and the matrix of multiplication by in this basis is of the form
The determinant of is calculated by induction on , by expanding along the first row. We obtain . In other words, we have . In particular, and . By the transitivity formula (III, §9, No. 4, p. 548, Corollary), we have
On the other hand, , so is a monic polynomial of degree . Lemma 6 follows.
Let us prove Proposition 8. Since the ring is simple, its center is a field (VIII, p. 121, Corollary 1). By Theorem 5 of VIII, p. 259, the commutant of in is a simple ring with center , and we have the equality . We denote the reduced degree of over by , that of over by , and the degree of over by . We have
and therefore , that is, .
Let be an element of , and let be its reduced characteristic polynomial over the -algebra ; it is monic of degree . By Lemma 6, the polynomial is monic of degree . The polynomial is therefore monic of degree . Again by Lemma 6, the coefficient of in is equal to , and the constant term of is .
Since , the left -module is free of rank (VIII, p. 124, Proposition 5). We therefore have
By the corollary of III, §9, No. 4, p. 548, we have
and since P(X) is the reduced characteristic polynomial of over the L-algebra B, we have
(62) Pc.
Finally, by formulas (60)—(62) and the definition of R(X), we have
(63) Pc,
so R(X) is the reduced characteristic polynomial of over the K-algebra A.
We have proved formula (56). Formulas (57) and (58) follow immediately from formula (56) and Lemma 6 because the coefficient of in Pcrd is equal to Trd and the constant term is Nrd.
6. Reduced Norms and Determinants
In this subsection, D is a field of finite degree over K with center K. We denote by the quotient of the multiplicative group by its derived (or commutator) group and by the canonical homomorphism from to . The mapping Nrd induces a group homomorphism from to ; the kernel of this homomorphism contains the derived group of because K is commutative. Hence there exists a unique homomorphism Nrd from to such that Nrd Nrd for every .
Proposition 9 00L2
Let V be a finite-dimensional right vector space over the field D. Let E be the algebra End over the field K; it is central simple and of finite degree. For every invertible element of E, we have
(64) Nrd Nrd(det )
(cf. VIII, p. 452, Proposition 2 for the definition of the determinant det of ).
We denote the dimension of V over D by and identify E with the matrix algebra using a basis of V over D. The multiplicative group GL of the algebra E is generated by the diagonal matrices and the matrices (II, §10, No. 13, p. 362, Corollary 1). Proposition 9 therefore follows from the two specific cases below.
A) Suppose that is the diagonal matrix diag(). For every , let be a maximal commutative subfield of D containing ; let L be the subalgebra of E consisting of the diagonal matrices diag() with for . Let be the reduced degree of D over K. We have for (VIII, p. 265, Corollary 2). The K-algebra L is isomorphic to and therefore semisimple of degree ; now, we have . It follows that L is a maximal commutative semisimple subalgebra of E (VIII, p. 262, Proposition 3). By Proposition 7 of VIII, p. 346, we have Nrd. Consequently, by formula (18) of III, §9, No. 3, p. 544, we have
Nrd Nrd
= Nrd Nrd().
Moreover, we have det by Proposition 3 of VIII, p. 453, which gives formula (64) in this case.
B) Suppose that is equal to , where is an element of D and are distinct integers in the interval . Denote by the reduced degree of D over K and by M the vector space over K deduced from V by restriction of scalars from D to K. Then M is a simple E-module, and we have
(65) Pc Pcrd
by formula (26) of VIII, p. 341. Moreover, M is a vector space of dimension over K, and is a nilpotent endomorphism of M; we therefore have
(66) Pc.
By comparing formulas (65) and (66), we obtain
(67) Pcrd
and, in particular, Nrd. We also have det by Proposition 3 of VIII, p. 453; formula (64) therefore holds in this case.
Remark 00L3
We have Nrd if the element of E is not invertible (VIII, p. 340, Proposition 3).
Exercises
See the exercises for § 17.