Bourbaki

§ 17. Reduced norms and traces

In this section, K is a commutative field and A a central simple K-algebra of finite degree. We denote the reduced degree of A by nn.

1. Complements on Characteristic Polynomials

Let L be a commutative ring and M a free L-module of finite rank mm. If uu is an endomorphism of M and rr a natural number, then we denote by cr(u)c_r(u) the trace of the endomorphism ∧r(u)\wedge^r(u) of the free L-module ∧r(M)\wedge^r(M). In particular, we have

(1) c0(u)=1,c1(u)=c_0(u) = 1,c_1(u) = Tr(uu),cm(u)=,c_m(u) = det(uu),

and cr(u)=0c_r(u) = 0 for r>mr > m. By Proposition 7 of III, §8, No. 4, p. 527, the mapping u↦u\mapsto det(uu) from End(M) to L is a homogeneous polynomial mapping of degree mm (IV, §5, No. 9, p. 55). More generally, for every integer rr such that 0⩽r⩽m0\leqslant r\leqslant m, the mapping crc_r from End(M) to L is a homogeneous polynomial mapping of degree rr; this follows from Proposition 10 of III, §8, No. 5, p. 529.

Let uu be an endomorphism of M and u‾\overline{u} the endomorphism of the L[X]module M[X]=M⊗LL[X]M[X] = M\otimes_LL[X] deduced from uu by extension of scalars (II, §5, No. 1, p. 277). Recall (III, §8, No. 11, p. 541, Definition 3 and (50)) that the characteristic polynomial of uu is the determinant χu(X)\chi_u(X) of the L[X]endomorphism X−u‾X-\overline{u} of M[X] and that we have the relation

χu(X)=∑r=0m(−1)rcr(u)Xm−r(2) \chi_u(X) =\sum_{r=0}^m(-1)^rc_r(u) X^{m-r} \tag{2}

Proposition 1 00KD

Let L be a commutative ring, M a free L-module of finite rank m ⩾1\geqslant 1, and u an endomorphism of M. There exists a unique endomorphism u~\tilde{u} of M satisfying the relation

u~(x)∧w=x∧∧m−1(u)(w) \tilde{u}(x) \wedge w = x \wedge \wedge^{m-1}(u)(w)

for x∈Mx \in M and w∈∧m−1(M)w \in \wedge^{m-1}(M). Moreover, we have the relations

u∘u~=u~∘u=det⁡(u)M, u \circ \tilde{u} = \tilde{u} \circ u = \det(u)_M,
det⁡(u~)=det⁡(u)m−1, \det(\tilde{u}) = \det(u)^{m-1},
u~=∑r=0m−1(−1)rcm−1−r(u)ur. \tilde{u} = \sum_{r=0}^{m-1} (-1)^r c_{m-1-r}(u) u^r.

Lemma 1 00KE

Let p be an integer such that 0⩽p⩽m0 \leqslant p \leqslant m. For any w in ∧p(M)\wedge^p(M), let hp(w)h_p(w) be the linear mapping w′↦w∧w′w' \mapsto w \wedge w' from ∧m−p(M)\wedge^{m-p}(M) to ∧m(M)\wedge^m(M). The linear mapping hp:w↦hp(w)h_p : w \mapsto h_p(w) from ∧p(M)\wedge^p(M) to Hom⁡L(∧m−p(M),∧m(M))\operatorname{Hom}_L(\wedge^{m-p}(M), \wedge^m(M)) is an isomorphism.

Let (ei)i∈I(e_i)_{i \in I} be a basis of M; we endow the set I with a total order. For any subset J of I, set eJ=ei1∧⋯∧eire_J = e_{i_1} \wedge \cdots \wedge e_{i_r}, where (i1,…,ir)(i_1, \ldots, i_r) is the sequence of elements of J in increasing order. The L-module ∧m−p(M)\wedge^{m-p}(M) admits as a basis the elements eSe_S, where S runs through the set of subsets of I with m−pm - p elements; ∧m(M)\wedge^m(M) has {eI}\{e_I\} as a basis. Consequently, there exists a basis of Hom⁡L(∧m−p(M),∧m(M))\operatorname{Hom}_L(\wedge^{m-p}(M), \wedge^m(M)) consisting of linear mappings eJ∗e_J^* characterized by the formula

eJ∗(eS)={eIif I=J∪S,0otherwise, e_J^*(e_S) = \begin{cases} e_I & \text{if } I = J \cup S, \\ 0 & \text{otherwise}, \end{cases}

where J runs through the set of subsets of I with p elements. It follows from formula (20) of III, §7, No. 8, p. 519 that for every subset J of I with p elements, we have hp(eJ)∈{eJ∗,−eJ∗}h_p(e_J) \in \{e_J^*, -e_J^*\}; since the elements eJe_J form a basis of ∧p(M)\wedge^p(M), the linear mapping hph_p is bijective.

Let us now prove Proposition 1. Let u and u~\tilde{u} be endomorphisms of M. Relation (3) is equivalent to

h1∘u~=Hom⁡(∧m−1(u)⋅1∧m(M))∘h1; h_1 \circ \tilde{u} = \operatorname{Hom}(\wedge^{m-1}(u) \cdot 1_{\wedge^m(M)}) \circ h_1;

the mapping h1h_1 is an isomorphism from M to Hom⁡L(∧m−1(M),∧m(M))\operatorname{Hom}_L(\wedge^{m-1}(M), \wedge^m(M)) by Lemma 1. Consequently, for every endomorphism u of M, there exists a unique endomorphism u~\tilde{u} of M satisfying relation (3).

Let x1,...,xmx_1, . . . , x_m be elements of M. Let us replace xx with u(x1)u(x_1) and ww with x2∧⋯∧xmx_2\wedge \cdots \wedge x_m in (3); we obtain

u~(u(x1))∧x2∧⋯∧xm=u(x1)∧⋯∧u(xm)=\widetilde{u}(u(x_1))\wedge x_2\wedge \cdots \wedge x_m=u(x_1)\wedge \cdots \wedge u(x_m) = det(uu)x1∧⋯∧xmx_1\wedge \cdots \wedge x_m.

Consequently, h1(u~∘u(x1))=h1h_1(\widetilde{u}\circ u(x_1)) =h_1(det(uu)x1x_1), which gives the relation u~∘u=\widetilde{u}\circ u= det(uu)M_M by Lemma 1.

We denote by U the endomorphism X−u‾X-\overline{u} of the L[X]-module M[X] (VIII, p. 335). By the above applied to U, there exists an endomorphism U~\widetilde{U} of the L[X]-module M[X] that satisfies the relations

U~(x1)∧x2∧⋯∧xm=x1∧(Xx2−u(x2))∧⋯∧(Xxm−u(xm))(9) \widetilde{U}(x_1)\wedge x_2\wedge \cdots \wedge x_m=x_1\wedge (Xx_2-u(x_2))\wedge \cdots \wedge (Xx_m-u(x_m)) \tag{9}

for x1,...,xmx_1, . . . , x_m in M and

(10) U~∘U=\widetilde{U}\circ U = det(X −u‾-\overline{u})M[X]_{M[X]}.

Let us view U~\widetilde{U} as an element of End(M)[X] (VIII, p. 9); by formula (9) and Lemma 1, it has degree ⩽m−1\leqslant m-1, so we can write it as

U~=∑r=0m−1(−1)rurXm−1−r(11) \widetilde{U} =\sum^{m-1}_{r=0}(-1)^ru_rX^{m-1-r} \tag{11}

where the uru_r are endomorphisms of M. By formula (2), relation (10) gives the equality

(∑r=0m−1(−1)rurXm−1−r)(X−u)=∑r=0m(−1)rcr(u)Xm−r(12) (\sum^{m-1}_{r=0}(-1)^ru_rX^{m-1-r})(X-u) =\sum_{r=0}^m(-1)^rc_r(u)X^{m-r} \tag{12}

in the ring End(M)[X]. By identifying the coefficients of the monomials in X on each side, we obtain the relations

(13) ur+ur−1∘u=cr(u)Mu_r+u_{r-1}\circ u=c_r(u)_M for 1⩽r⩽m−11\leqslant r\leqslant m-1

and

u0=c0(u)M,um−1∘u=cm(u)M(14) u_0=c_0(u)_M,u_{m-1}\circ u=c_m(u)_M \tag{14}

From this, we deduce

um−1=∑r=0m−1(−1)rcm−1−r(u)ur(15) u_{m-1}=\sum^{m-1}_{r=0}(-1)^rc_{m-1-r}(u)u^r \tag{15}

Now, when we identify the constant terms, equalities (9) and (11) imply um−1=u~u_{m-1}=\widetilde{u}; formula (6) follows.

In particular, u~\widetilde{u} belongs to the subalgebra of End(M) generated by uu and therefore commutes with uu. We have already established the relation u~∘u=\widetilde{u}\circ u= det(uu)M_M; formula (4) follows.

Finally, let x1,...,xmx_1, . . . , x_m be elements of M. We replace xx with x1x_1 and ww with u~(x2)∧⋯∧u~(xm)\widetilde{u}(x_2)\wedge \cdots \wedge \widetilde{u}(x_m) in formula (3). This gives

u~(x1)∧u~(x2)∧⋯∧u~(xm)=x1∧u∘(u~(x2))∧⋯∧u∘(u~(xm)) \widetilde{u}(x_1)\wedge \widetilde{u}(x_2)\wedge \cdots \wedge \widetilde{u}(x_m) =x_1\wedge u\circ (\widetilde{u}(x_2))\wedge \cdots \wedge u\circ (\widetilde{u}(x_m))

= det(uu)m−1x1∧x2∧⋯∧xm^{m-1}x_1\wedge x_2\wedge \cdots \wedge x_m

and therefore formula (5).

Remark 1 00KF

The endomorphism u~\widetilde{u} of M coincides with what we called the cotranspose of uu in III, §8, No. 6, p. 532.

Remark 2 00KG

From formulas (1), (2), (4), and (6), we deduce the relation χu(u)=0\chi_u(u) = 0 and therefore another proof of the Cayley–Hamilton theorem (III, §8, No. 11, p. 541).

Remark 3 00KH

Since the mapping crc_r from End(M) to L is a homogeneous polynomial mapping of degree rr for 0⩽r⩽m−10\leqslant r\leqslant m-1, it follows from formula (6) that the mapping u↦u~u\mapsto \widetilde{u} from End(M) to End(M) is a homogeneous polynomial mapping of degree m−1m-1.

Let B be an algebra over the ring L; suppose that B is a free L-module of rank m⩾1m\geqslant 1, and identify L with the subring L⋅1L\cdot 1 of B. Let bb be an element of B. We apply the above to the endomorphism γ(b):x↦bx\gamma (b) :x\mapsto bx of the L-module B. Set γr(b)=cr(γ(b))\gamma_r(b) =c_r(\gamma (b)) for 0⩽r⩽m0\leqslant r\leqslant m; we have, in particular, γm(b)=NB/L(b)\gamma_m(b) = N_{B/L}(b) (III, §9, No. 3, p. 543). The characteristic polynomial of bb (loc. cit.) can be written as

(16) PcB/L(b;X)=∑r=0m(−1)rγr(b)Xm−r_{B/L}(b; X) =\sum_{r=0}^m(-1)^r\gamma_r(b) X^{m-r}.

Since the mapping γ\gamma from B to EndL(B)_L(B) is L-linear, the mapping γr\gamma_r from B to L is a homogeneous polynomial mapping of degree rr. In particular, the mapping b↦NB/L(b)b\mapsto N_{B/L}(b) from B to L is a homogeneous polynomial mapping of degree mm.

For any element bb of B, set

b~=∑r=0m−1(−1)rγm−1−r(b)br(17) \widetilde{b}=\sum^{m-1}_{r=0}(-1)^r\gamma_{m-1-r}(b)b^r \tag{17}

By Proposition 1, the linear mapping γ(b~)\gamma (\widetilde{b}) from B to B is the cotranspose of the mapping γ(b)\gamma (b); from this, we deduce

bb~=b~b=NB/L(b)(18) b\widetilde{b}=\widetilde{b}b= N_{B/L}(b) \tag{18}

Moreover, the mapping b↦b~b\mapsto \widetilde{b} from B to B is a homogeneous polynomial mapping of degree m−1m-1.

2. Reduced Norms and Traces

Recall that we denote by A a central simple algebra over the commutative field K of reduced degree nn.

Proposition 2 00KI

Let aa be an element of A and Pc(a;Xa; X) its characteristic polynomial. There exists a unique monic polynomial P in K[X] such that we have Pc(a;Xa; X) =P(X)n= P(X)^n.

A) The uniqueness of P follows from Lemma 2 below.

Lemma 2 00KJ

Let P and Q be monic polynomials in K[X] and ss is a strictly positive integer. If Ps=QsP^s= Q^s, then we have P = Q.

Let I\mathscr{I} be the set of irreducible monic polynomials in K[X]. Since P and Q are monic, there exist elements (aF)(a_F) and (bF)(b_F) of N(I)\mathbf{N}^{(\mathscr{I})} such that we have P=∏F∈IFaFP =\prod_{F\in\mathscr{I}}F^{a_F} and Q=∏F∈IFbFQ =\prod_{F\in\mathscr{I}}F^{b_F}. It follows from the equality Ps=QsP^s= Q^s and the uniqueness of the decomposition into irreducible factors that we have saF=sbFsa_F=sb_F for every F∈IF\in \mathscr{I}. Since ss is strictly positive, we consequently have aF=bFa_F=b_F for every F∈IF\in \mathscr{I}, and therefore P = Q.

B) Let us now prove the existence of P.

By Theorem 1 of VIII, p. 252, there exist a Galois extension L of K of finite degree and an isomorphism of L-algebras θ:A(L)→Mn(L)\theta : A_{(L)}\rightarrow \mathbf{M}_n(L). By formula (12) of III, §9, No. 1, p. 542, the polynomial Pc(a;Xa; X) is also the characteristic polynomial of the element 1⊗a1\otimes a of the L-algebra A(L)A_{(L)}, hence of the element θ(1⊗a)\theta (1\otimes a) of the L-algebra Mn(L)\mathbf{M}_n(L).

Set P(X) = det(XIn−θ(1⊗a)I_n-\theta (1\otimes a)); it is a monic polynomial in L[X]. By Example 3 of III, §9, No. 3, p. 545, we have

(19) Pc(a;Xa; X) =P(X)n= P(X)^n.

Let G be the Galois group of L over K. For σ∈G\sigma \in G, denote by σ‾\overline{\sigma} the automorphism of the ring L[X] that coincides with σ\sigma on L and fixes X. Then K[X] is the set of polynomials Q of L[X] such that we have σ‾(Q)=Q\overline{\sigma}(Q) = Q for every σ∈G\sigma \in G (V, §10, No. 1, p. 56, Theorem 1). Since the polynomial Pc(a;Xa; X) =P(X)n= P(X)^n belongs to K[X], we have σ‾(P)n=Pn\overline{\sigma}(P)^n= P^n for every σ∈G\sigma \in G. By Lemma 2, we therefore have σ‾(P)=P\overline{\sigma}(P) = P for every σ∈G\sigma \in G, so P belongs to K[X].

Definition 1 00RM

Let aa be an element of the algebra A. The reduced characteristic polynomial of aa (with respect to A) is the unique monic polynomial in K[X], denoted by PcrdA/K(a;X)_{A/K}(a; X), that satisfies the relation

(20) PcA/K(a;X)=_{A/K}(a; X) = PcrdA/K(a;X)n_{A/K}(a; X)^n.

Let aa be an element of A. Since A has degree n2n^2 over K, the polynomial PcA/K(a;X)_{A/K}(a; X) has degree n2n^2, so PcrdA/K(a;X)_{A/K}(a; X) is a monic polynomial of degree nn; let us write it as

(21) PcrdA/K(a;X)=Xn+∑r=0n−1(−1)rbr(a)Xn−r_{A/K}(a; X) = X^n+\sum^{n-1}_{r=0}(-1)^rb_r(a)X^{n-r}.

We set

(22) TrdA/K(a)=b1(a)_{A/K}(a) =b_1(a), NrdA/K(a)=bn(a)_{A/K}(a) =b_n(a).

Definition 2 00KK

We call TrdA/K(a)_{A/K}(a) the reduced trace of A and NrdA/K(a)_{A/K}(a) its reduced norm (with respect to the K-algebra A).

When there is no risk of confusion, we leave A and K out of the notation and simply write Pcrd(a;Xa; X), Trd(aa), and Nrd(aa).

The following formulas result from formulas (20) and (22) and formulas (7) and (8) of III, §9, No. 1, p. 542:

(23) TrA/K(a)=n_{A/K}(a) =n TrdA/K(a)_{A/K}(a),

(24) NA/K(a)=N_{A/K}(a) = (NrdA/K(a)_{A/K}(a))n^n.

Proposition 3 00KL

An element aa of A is invertible if and only if its reduced norm is nonzero. In particular, A is a field if and only if we have NrdA/K(a)≠0_{A/K}(a)\not= 0 for every nonzero element aa of A.

An element aa of A is invertible if and only if its norm is nonzero (III, §9, No. 4, p. 545, Proposition 3). Proposition 3 therefore follows from formula (24).

Remark 00KM

Let L be the field K(X) of rational fractions in one variable X. The reduced characteristic polynomial of an element aa of A is simply the reduced norm of the element X⊗1−1⊗aX\otimes 1-1\otimes a of the L-algebra A(L)A_{(L)}. This follows from the definition of the reduced characteristic polynomial and the formula (III, §9, No. 3, p. 544)

(25) PcA/K(a;X)=NA(L)/L(X⊗1−1⊗a)_{A/K}(a; X) = N_{A_{(L)}/L}(X\otimes 1-1\otimes a).

Example 1 00RN

By Theorem 1 of VIII, p. 120, there exist an integer r⩾1r\geqslant 1 and a field D such that A is isomorphic to Mr(D)\mathbf{M}_r(D). Let dd be the reduced degree of D over K; we have r=n/dr=n/d. Let M be an A-module of finite length ℓ\ell; we will prove the formula

(26) PcM/K(aM;X)=_{M/K}(a_M; X) = PcrdA/K(a;X)dℓ_{A/K}(a; X)^{d\ell}

for every element aa of A. The A-module AsA_s has length rr (VIII, p. 121, Lemma 2). The A-modules MrM^r and AsℓA^{\ell}_s have the same length, so they are isomorphic, and we have

PcM/K(aM;X)r=_{M/K}(a_M; X)^r= PcA/K(a;X)ℓ_{A/K}(a; X)^{\ell}

by formula (15) of III, §9, No. 2, p. 542. Since we have rd=nrd=n, formula (26) follows from formula (20) and Lemma 2 (VIII, p. 339).

Example 2 00RO

Consider the specific case when A is the algebra EndK(V)_K(V) of endomorphisms of a finite-dimensional K-vector space V. Taking M to be the simple A-module V, we obtain the relations

PcrdA/K(u;X)=χu(X)_{A/K}(u; X) =\chi_u(X),

(27) NrdA/K(u)=_{A/K}(u) = det(uu),

TrdA/K(u)=_{A/K}(u) = Tr(uu)

for every endomorphism uu of V.

3. Properties of Reduced Norms and Traces

Proposition 4 00KN

Let L be an extension of K and aa an element of the central simple algebra A. We have the relations

(28) PcrdA(L)/L(1⊗a;X)=_{A_{(L)}/L}(1\otimes a; X) = PcrdA/K(a;X)_{A/K}(a; X),

(29) TrdA(L)/L(1⊗a)=_{A_{(L)}/L}(1\otimes a) = TrdA/K(a)_{A/K}(a),

(30) NrdA(L)/L(1⊗a)=_{A_{(L)}/L}(1\otimes a) = NrdA/K(a)_{A/K}(a)

(“invariance under extension of scalars”).

The two sides of equality (28) have the same nn-th power by the definition (formula (20) of VIII, p. 340) and the relation

PcA(L)/L(1⊗a;X)=_{A_{(L)}/L}(1\otimes a; X) = PcA/K(a;X)_{A/K}(a; X) (III, §9, No. 3, p. 544, formula (21)). Equality (28) therefore follows from Lemma 2 of VIII, p. 339. Formulas (29) and (30) follow from (28), (21), and (22).

Corollary 1 00KO

Let L be an extension of K. Let V be a vector space of dimension nn over L and θ\theta a K-algebra homomorphism from A to EndL(V)_L(V). For every element aa of A, we have

(31) PcrdA/K(a;X)=χθ(a)(X)_{A/K}(a; X) =\chi_{\theta(a)}(X),

(32) TrdA/K(a)=_{A/K}(a) = Tr(θ(a)\theta (a)),

(33) NrdA/K(a)=_{A/K}(a) = det(θ(a)\theta (a)).

Let θ′\theta ' be the L-algebra homomorphism from A(L)A_{(L)} to EndL(V)_L(V) such that θ′(λ⊗a)=λθ(a)\theta '(\lambda \otimes a) =\lambda \theta (a) for λ∈L\lambda \in L and a∈Aa\in A. The algebra A(L)A_{(L)} is simple by Corollary 2 of VIII, p. 222; the homomorphism θ′\theta ' is therefore injective. But the algebras A(L)A_{(L)} and EndL(V)_L(V) over the field L have the same degree, equal to n2n^2, so θ′\theta ' is an isomorphism. Corollary 1 then follows from Proposition 4 and Example 2 above.

Corollary 2 00KP

Let aa and a′a' be elements of A and λ\lambda an element of K. We have the relations

(34) PcrdA/K(a;a)=0_{A/K}(a;a) = 0,

(35) PcrdA/K(λa;λX)=λn_{A/K}(\lambda a;\lambda X) =\lambda^n PcrdA/K(a;X)_{A/K}(a; X),

(36) TrdA/K(a+a′)=_{A/K}(a+a') = TrdA/K(a)+_{A/K}(a) + TrdA/K(a′)_{A/K}(a'),

TrdA/K(λa)=λ_{A/K}(\lambda a) =\lambda TrdA/K(a)_{A/K}(a),

(37) TrdA/K(aa′)=_{A/K}(aa') = TrdA/K(a′a)_{A/K}(a'a),

(38) NrdA/K(aa′)=_{A/K}(aa') = NrdA/K(a)⋅_{A/K}(a)\cdot NrdA/K(a′)_{A/K}(a'),

NrdA/K(λa)=λn_{A/K}(\lambda a) =\lambda^n NrdA/K(a)_{A/K}(a),

(39) TrdA/K(1)=n_{A/K}(1) =n, NrdA/K(1)=1_{A/K}(1) = 1.

Since A is central simple and has reduced degree nn over K, there exist an extension L of K and a vector space V of dimension nn over L such that A(L)A_{(L)} is isomorphic to the algebra EndL(V)_L(V) (VIII, p. 252, Theorem 1). Corollary 2 then follows from Corollary 1 and the properties of the trace and determinant of an endomorphism. In particular, formula (34) follows from the Cayley– Hamilton theorem (III, §8, No. 11, p. 541, Proposition 20, cf. also VIII, p. 338, Remark 2).

Corollary 3 00RP

Let AoA^o be the opposite algebra of A. For every aa in A, we have

(40) PcrdAo/K(a;X)=_{A^o/K}(a; X) = PcrdA/K(a;X)_{A/K}(a; X),

(41) TrdAo/K(a)=_{A^o/K}(a) = TrdA/K(a)_{A/K}(a),

(42) NrdAo/K(a)=_{A^o/K}(a) = NrdA/K(a)_{A/K}(a).

Choose an extension L of K, a vector space V of dimension nn over L, and a homomorphism θ\theta from A to EndL(V)_L(V) (VIII, p. 252, Theorem 1). Let V∗V^* be the dual vector space of V. The mapping that sends an element aa of A to the endomorphism tθ(a)^t\theta (a) of V∗V^* is a K-algebra homomorphism from AoA^o to EndL(V∗)_L(V^*). Corollary 3 then follows from Corollary 1 and Corollary 3 of III, §8, No. 4, p. 528.

The trace, norm, and characteristic polynomial of aa are therefore the same whether we view aa as an element of A or as an element of AoA^o. This property does not always hold when A is not assumed central simple (III, §9, p. 644, Exercise 1).

Proposition 5 00KQ

For any xx in A, let txt_x be the linear form y↦y\mapsto TrdA/K(xy)_{A/K}(xy) on A.

a) The mapping t:x↦txt:x\mapsto t_x is an isomorphism of (A,A)(A,A)-bimodules from A to its dual HomK(A,K)_K(A,K).

b) Let hh be a linear form on A. The following properties are equivalent:

(i) There exists an element λ\lambda of K such that h(x)=λh(x) =\lambda TrdA/K(x)_{A/K}(x)

for every x∈Ax\in A.

(ii) We have h(xy)=h(yx)h(xy) =h(yx) for all x,yx, y in A.

Recall (II, §1, No. 14, p. 225–226) that the (A(A, A)-bimodule structure on A∗=A^*= HomK(A,K)_K(A,K) is defined by the relation

⟨atb,c⟩=⟨t,bca⟩(43) \langle atb, c\rangle =\langle t, bca\rangle \tag{43}

for a,b,c∈Aa, b, c\in A and t∈A∗t\in A^*. In particular, for every xx in A, we have

⟨atxb,c⟩=⟨tx,bca⟩=\langle at_xb, c\rangle =\langle t_x, bca\rangle = TrdA/K(xbca)_{A/K}(xbca),

⟨taxb,c⟩=\langle t_{axb}, c\rangle = TrdA/K(axbc)_{A/K}(axbc),

and these two elements are equal by formula (37) of VIII, p. 342. We therefore have atxb=taxbat_xb=t_{axb}, which means that tt is a homomorphism of (A(A, A)-bimodules from A to A∗A^*.

We choose an extension L of the field K and an isomorphism θ\theta from the L-algebra A(L)A_{(L)} to the matrix algebra Mn(L)\mathbf{M}_n(L) (VIII, p. 252, Theorem 1). We identify the vector space (A∗)(L)(A^*)_{(L)} with the dual of the vector space A(L)A_{(L)} over the field L. By Proposition 4 of VIII, p. 341, with these conventions, we have

(44) TrdA(L)/L=1L⊗_{A_{(L)}/L}= 1_L\otimes TrdA/K_{A/K}.

Let t(L)t_{(L)} be the L-linear mapping from A(L)A_{(L)} to A(L)∗A^*_{(L)} deduced from tt by extension of scalars; by formula (44) and Corollary 1, we have

(45) ⟨t(L)(x),y⟩=\langle t_{(L)}(x), y\rangle = TrdA(L)/L(xy)=_{A_{(L)}/L}(xy) = Tr(θ(x)θ(y)\theta (x)\theta (y))

for x,yx, y in A(L)A_{(L)}. By Proposition 7 of II, §10, No. 11, p. 358, the mapping t(L)t_{(L)} is bijective; it follows that tt is bijective. We have proved a).

Let hh be in A∗A^*; by the above, there exists an element aa of A such that hh is equal to tat_a. By a), we have

h(xy)−h(yx)=ta(xy−yx)=tax(y)−txa(y) h(xy)-h(yx) =t_a(xy-yx) =t_{ax}(y)-t_{xa}(y)

Consequently, the relation “h(xy)=h(yx)h(xy) =h(yx) for x,yx, y in A” is equivalent to “tax−xa=0t_{ax-xa}= 0 for every x∈x\in A”, and by part a) of the proof, this means that aa belongs to the center K of A. This proves b) in view of formula (36).

Corollary 00KR

The linear subspace of A generated by the elements of the form xy−yxxy-yx, where xx and yy run through A, is a hyperplane, the kernel of the nonzero linear form TrdA/K_{A/K}.

Remark 00KS

By formula (23) of VIII, p. 340, we have

TrA/K(a)=n_{A/K}(a) =n TrdA/K(a)_{A/K}(a)

for every a∈Aa\in A. If the characteristic of the field K is equal to 0 or a prime number pp that does not divide nn, then we can replace the reduced trace with the trace in Proposition 5. On the other hand, if the characteristic of K is a prime number that divides nn, then we have TrA/K(a)=0_{A/K}(a) = 0 for every a∈Aa\in A.

4. The Reduced Norm is a Polynomial Function

Lemma 3 00KT

Let L be an extension of K, and let I be a set and T=(Ti)i∈I\mathbf{T}= (T_i)_{i\in I} a family of variables. We have K(T)∩L[T]=K[T]K(\mathbf{T})\cap L[\mathbf{T}] = K[\mathbf{T}].

Let P and Q be elements of K[T]K[\mathbf{T}] with Q≠0Q\not= 0. The coefficients of the polynomials R in L[T]L[\mathbf{T}] such that P = QR are the solutions of a system of linear equations with coefficients in K. Consequently, if there exists a polynomial R∈L[T]R\in L[\mathbf{T}] such that P = QR, then there also exists one in K[T]K[\mathbf{T}] (II, §8, No. 5, p. 321, Proposition 6). This proves the inclusion K(T)∩L[T]⊂K[T]K(\mathbf{T})\cap L[\mathbf{T}]\subset K[\mathbf{T}]; the reverse inclusion is obvious.

Recall that the reduced characteristic polynomial of an element aa of A can be written as

(46) PcrdA/K(a;X)=∑r=0n(−1)rbr(a)Xn−r_{A/K}(a; X) =\sum_{r=0}^n(-1)^rb_r(a) X^{n-r}

and that we have

b0(a)=1,b1(a)=b_0(a) = 1,b_1(a) = TrdA/K(a),bn(a)=_{A/K}(a),b_n(a) = NrdA/K(a)_{A/K}(a).

Proposition 6 00KU

For every integer rr such that 0⩽r⩽n0\leqslant r\leqslant n, the mapping brb_r from A to K is a homogeneous polynomial mapping of degree rr. In particular, the reduced norm is a homogeneous polynomial mapping of degree nn from A to K.

Let (ei)i∈I(e_i)_{i\in I} be a basis of A over K and T=(Ti)i∈I\mathbf{T}= (T_i)_{i\in I} a family of variables.

Lemma 4 00KV

Let uu be the element ∑i∈ITi⊗ei\sum_{i\in I}T_i\otimes e_i of the central simple K(T)K(\mathbf{T})-algebra A(K(T))A_{(K(\mathbf{T}))}. Let P be the reduced characteristic polynomial of uu. Then P belongs to the ring K[T][X]K[\mathbf{T}][X]; viewed as an element of the ring K[T,X]K[\mathbf{T},X], it is homogeneous of degree nn.

We choose an extension L of K and an L-algebra isomorphism θ\theta from A(L)A_{(L)} to Mn(L)\mathbf{M}_n(L). We denote by θ‾:A(L(T))→Mn(L(T))\overline{\theta}: A_{(L(\mathbf{T}))}\rightarrow \mathbf{M}_n(L(\mathbf{T})) the isomorphism of L(T)L(\mathbf{T})-algebras deduced from θ\theta by extension of scalars. By Corollary 1 of VIII, p. 342, we have

(47) P(X)=χθ‾(u)(X)=P(X) =\chi_{\overline{\theta}(u)}(X) = det(XIn−θ‾(u)I_n-\overline{\theta}(u)) == det(XIn−∑i∈ITiθ(1⊗ei))(XI_n-\sum_{i\in I}T_i\theta (1\otimes e_i)).

Since the matrices θ(1⊗ei)\theta (1\otimes e_i) belong to Mn\mathbf{M}_n(L), this formula shows that P is a homogeneous polynomial of degree nn in L[T,X]L[\mathbf{T},X]. It also belongs to K(T)[X]K(\mathbf{T})[X] and can be written as P(X)=∑j⩾0cjXjP(X) =\sum_{j\geqslant 0}c_jX^j, where each cjc_j belongs to the intersection K(T)∩L[T]K(\mathbf{T})\cap L[\mathbf{T}]. By Lemma 3, each of the elements cjc_j belongs to K[T]K[\mathbf{T}]; Lemma 4 follows.

Lemma 5 00KW

For every extension K′K' of K and every element (ti)i∈I(t_i)_{i\in I} of K′I{K'}^I, we have

(48) PcrdA(K′)/K′(∑i∈Iti⊗ei)=P((ti)i∈I,X)_{A_{(K')}/K'}(\sum_{i\in I}t_i\otimes e_i)= P((t_i)_{i\in I},X).

Let φ:K[T]→K′\varphi : K[\mathbf{T}]\rightarrow K' be the unique K-algebra homomorphism that sends TiT_i to tit_i for every i∈Ii\in I; it defines on K′K' the structure of a K[TK[\mathbf{T}]-algebra. The K′K'-algebra A(K[T])(K′)A_{(K[\mathbf{T}])(K')} can be identified with A(K′)A_{(K')} (transitivity of extension of scalars), where the element 1⊗(∑Ti⊗ei)1\otimes (\sum T_i\otimes e_i) is identified with the element ∑ti⊗ei\sum t_i\otimes e_i of A(K′)A_{(K')}. We denote by φ‾:K[T][X]→K′[X]\overline{\varphi}: K[\mathbf{T}][X]\rightarrow K'[X] the K-algebra homomorphism deduced from φ\varphi. By formula (21) of III, §9, No. 3, p. 544, the characteristic polynomial of ∑ti⊗ei\sum t_i\otimes e_i with respect to the K′K'-algebra A(K′)A_{(K')} is the image by φ‾\overline{\varphi} of the characteristic polynomial of ∑Ti⊗ei\sum T_i\otimes e_i with respect to the K[TK[\mathbf{T}]-algebra A(K[T])A_{(K[\mathbf{T}])}, that is, of PnP^n. In other words, we have

(49) PcA(K′)/K′(∑i∈Iti⊗ei;X)=P((ti)i∈I,X)n_{A_{(K')}/K'}(\sum_{i\in I}t_i\otimes e_i; X)= P((t_i)_{i\in I},X)^n;

Lemma 5 then follows from Lemma 2 of VIII, p. 339.

Consider the specific case K′=KK'= K of Lemma 5. We have

(50) PcrdA/K(∑i∈Itiei;X)=P((ti)i∈I,X)_{A/K}(\sum_{i\in I}t_ie_i; X)= P((t_i)_{i\in I},X)

for every element (ti)i∈I(t_i)_{i\in I} of KIK^I. Since the polynomial P in K[T,X]K[\mathbf{T},X] is homogeneous of degree nn, it can be expanded uniquely as

P(T,X)=∑r=0n(−1)rBr(T)Xn−r(51) P(\mathbf{T},X) =\sum_{r=0}^n(-1)^rB_r(\mathbf{T}) X^{n-r} \tag{51}

where BrB_r is a homogeneous polynomial of degree rr in K[T]K[\mathbf{T}]. By formulas (46), (50), and (51), we have

br(∑i∈Itiei)=Br((ti)i∈I) b_r(\sum_{i\in I}t_ie_i)= B_r((t_i)_{i\in I})

for every element (ti)i∈I(t_i)_{i\in I} of KIK^I. Proposition 6 follows.

Remark 00KX

Let K′K' be a commutative K-algebra. Every element tt of A(K′)A_{(K')} can be written as ∑i∈Iti⊗ei\sum_{i\in I}t_i\otimes e_i, where (ti)∈K′I(t_i)\in {K'}^I. It follows from the proof of Lemma 5 that the characteristic polynomial PcA(K′)/K′(t;X)_{A_{(K')}/K'}(t; X) is equal to P((ti),X)nP((t_i),X)^n.

5. Transitivity of Reduced Norms and Traces

Proposition 7 00KY

Let L be a maximal commutative semisimple subalgebra of A and aa an element of L. We have

(52) PcrdA/K(a;X)=_{A/K}(a; X) = PcL/K(a;X)_{L/K}(a; X),

(53) TrdA/K(a)=_{A/K}(a) = TrL/K(a)_{L/K}(a),

(54) NrdA/K(a)=NL/K(a)_{A/K}(a) = N_{L/K}(a).

By Proposition 3 of VIII, p. 262, the L-modules A and LnL^n are isomorphic; we therefore have the relation

PcA/K(a;X)=_{A/K}(a; X) = PcL/K(a;X)n_{L/K}(a; X)^n.

Since the polynomial PcL/K(a;X)_{L/K}(a; X) is monic, it is therefore equal to the reduced characteristic polynomial PcrdA/K(a;X)_{A/K}(a; X) (VIII, p. 339, Lemma 2); this gives formula (52). By comparing the coefficients of Xn−1X^{n-1} (resp. the constant terms) on each side of (52), we obtain formula (53) (resp. (54)).

Corollary 00KZ

Let D be a field of finite degree over K with center K. Let aa be an element of K and L a maximal commutative subfield of D containing aa. We have

PcrdD/K(a;X)=_{D/K}(a; X) = PcL/K(a;X)_{L/K}(a; X),

(55) TrD/K(a)=_{D/K}(a) = TrL/K(a)_{L/K}(a),

NrdD/K(a)=NL/K(a)_{D/K}(a) = N_{L/K}(a).

Indeed, a maximal commutative subfield L of D is a maximal commutative semisimple subalgebra of D by Corollary 2 of VIII, p. 265.

Proposition 8 00L0

Let B be a simple subalgebra of A. Denote the center of B by L and the commutant of B in A by B′B'. Then B′B' is a central simple algebra over the field L; we denote its reduced degree by rr. For every element bb of B, we have the relations

(56) PcrdA/K(b;X)=NL[X]/K[X]_{A/K}(b; X) = N_{L[X]/K[X]}(PcrdB/L(b;X)_{B/L}(b; X))r^r,

(57) TrdA/K(b)=r_{A/K}(b) =r TrL/K_{L/K}(TrdB/K(b)_{B/K}(b)),

(58) NrdA/K(b)=NL/K_{A/K}(b) = N_{L/K}(NrdB/L(b)_{B/L}(b))r^r.

Lemma 6 00L1

Let K′K' be a commutative algebra of finite degree dd over K and

P(X)=Xs+a1Xs−1+⋯+as P(X) = X^s+a_1X^{s-1}+\cdots +a_s

a monic polynomial with coefficients in K′K'. Then the polynomial Q = NK′[X]/K[X](P)N_{K'[X]/K[X]}(P) in K[X] is monic of degree sdsd, the coefficient of Xsd−1X^{sd-1} in Q(X) is equal to TrK′/K(a1)_{K'/K}(a_1), and the constant term of Q is NK′/K(as)N_{K'/K}(a_s).

We denote the K′K'-algebra K′[T]/(P(T))K'[T]/(P(T)) by K′′K'' and the canonical class of T in K′′K'' by tt. The sequence (1,t,...,ts−1)(1, t, . . . , t^{s-1}) is a basis of K′′K'' over K′K', and the matrix of multiplication by tt in this basis is of the form

τ=(00⋯0−as10⋯0−as−101⋯0−as−2⋮⋮⋱⋮⋮0⋯⋯1−a1). \tau = \begin{pmatrix} 0 & 0 & \cdots & 0 & -a_s \\ 1 & 0 & \cdots & 0 & -a_{s-1} \\ 0 & 1 & \cdots & 0 & -a_{s-2} \\ \vdots & \vdots & \ddots & \vdots & \vdots \\ 0 & \cdots & \cdots & 1 & -a_1 \end{pmatrix}.

The determinant of XIn−τXI_n - \tau is calculated by induction on ss, by expanding along the first row. We obtain det⁡(XIn−τ)=P(X)\det(XI_n - \tau) = P(X). In other words, we have P(X)=PcK′′/K′(t;X)P(X) = Pc_{K''/K'}(t; X). In particular, Tr⁡K′′/K′(t)=−a1\operatorname{Tr}_{K''/K'}(t) = -a_1 and NK′′/K′(t)=(−1)sasN_{K''/K'}(t) = (-1)^s a_s. By the transitivity formula (III, §9, No. 4, p. 548, Corollary), we have

Tr⁡K′′/K(t)=−Tr⁡K′/K(a1),NK′′/K(t)=(−1)sdNK′/K(as), \operatorname{Tr}_{K''/K}(t) = -\operatorname{Tr}_{K'/K}(a_1), \quad N_{K''/K}(t) = (-1)^{sd} N_{K'/K}(a_s),
Q(X)=PcK′′/K(t;X). Q(X) = Pc_{K''/K}(t; X).

On the other hand, [K′′:K]=[K′′:K′][K′:K]=sd[K'' : K] = [K'' : K'][K' : K] = sd, so Q(X)Q(X) is a monic polynomial of degree sdsd. Lemma 6 follows.

Let us prove Proposition 8. Since the ring BB is simple, its center LL is a field (VIII, p. 121, Corollary 1). By Theorem 5 of VIII, p. 259, the commutant B′B' of BB in AA is a simple ring with center LL, and we have the equality [A:K]=[B:K][B′:K][A : K] = [B : K][B' : K]. We denote the reduced degree of B′B' over LL by rr, that of BB over LL by ss, and the degree of LL over KK by dd. We have

[A:K]=n2,[B′:K]=r2d,[B:K]=s2d, [A : K] = n^2, \quad [B' : K] = r^2 d, \quad [B : K] = s^2 d,

and therefore n2=r2s2d2n^2 = r^2 s^2 d^2, that is, n=rsdn = rsd.

Let bb be an element of BB, and let P(X)P(X) be its reduced characteristic polynomial over the LL-algebra BB; it is monic of degree ss. By Lemma 6, the polynomial Q=NL[X]/K[X](P)Q = N_{L[X]/K[X]}(P) is monic of degree sdsd. The polynomial R=QrR = Q^r is therefore monic of degree rsd=nrsd = n. Again by Lemma 6, the coefficient of Xn−1X^{n-1} in R(X)R(X) is equal to −rTr⁡L/K(Trd⁡B/L(b))-r \operatorname{Tr}_{L/K}(\operatorname{Trd}_{B/L}(b)), and the constant term of R(X)R(X) is (NL/K((−1)sNrd⁡B/L(b)))r=(−1)nNL/K(Nrd⁡B/L(b))r(N_{L/K}((-1)^s \operatorname{Nrd}_{B/L}(b)))^r = (-1)^n N_{L/K}(\operatorname{Nrd}_{B/L}(b))^r.

Since [A:K]=r2d[B:K][A : K] = r^2 d[B : K], the left BB-module AA is free of rank r2dr^2 d (VIII, p. 124, Proposition 5). We therefore have

Pc⁡A/K(b;X)=Pc⁡B/K(b;X)dr2. \operatorname{Pc}_{A/K}(b; X) = \operatorname{Pc}_{B/K}(b; X)^{dr^2}.

By the corollary of III, §9, No. 4, p. 548, we have

Pc⁡B/K(b;X)=NL[X]/K[X](Pc⁡B/L(b;X)), \operatorname{Pc}_{B/K}(b; X) = N_{L[X]/K[X]}(\operatorname{Pc}_{B/L}(b; X)),

and since P(X) is the reduced characteristic polynomial of bb over the L-algebra B, we have

(62) PcB/L(b;X)=P(X)s_{B/L}(b; X) = P(X)^s.

Finally, by formulas (60)—(62) and the definition of R(X), we have

(63) PcA/K(b;X)=NL[X]/K[X](P(X))dr2s=Q(X)dr2s=R(X)rsd=R(X)n_{A/K}(b; X) = N_{L[X]/K[X]}(P(X))^{dr^2s}= Q(X)^{dr^2s}= R(X)^{rsd}= R(X)^n,

so R(X) is the reduced characteristic polynomial of bb over the K-algebra A.

We have proved formula (56). Formulas (57) and (58) follow immediately from formula (56) and Lemma 6 because the coefficient of Xn−1X^{n-1} in PcrdA/K(b;X)_{A/K}(b; X) is equal to −- TrdA/K(b)_{A/K}(b) and the constant term is (−1)n(-1)^n NrdA/K(b)_{A/K}(b).

6. Reduced Norms and Determinants

In this subsection, D is a field of finite degree over K with center K. We denote by Dab∗D^*_{ab} the quotient of the multiplicative group D∗D^* by its derived (or commutator) group and by π\pi the canonical homomorphism from D∗D^* to Dab∗D^*_{ab}. The mapping NrdD/K_{D/K} induces a group homomorphism from D∗D^* to K∗K^*; the kernel of this homomorphism contains the derived group of D∗D^* because K is commutative. Hence there exists a unique homomorphism Nrd from Dab∗D^*_{ab} to K∗K^* such that NrdD/K(x)=_{D/K}(x) = Nrd ∘π(x)\circ \pi (x) for every x∈D∗x\in D^*.

Proposition 9 00L2

Let V be a finite-dimensional right vector space over the field D. Let E be the algebra EndD(V)_D(V) over the field K; it is central simple and of finite degree. For every invertible element uu of E, we have

(64) NrdE/K(u)=_{E/K}(u) = Nrd(det uu)

(cf. VIII, p. 452, Proposition 2 for the definition of the determinant det uu of uu).

We denote the dimension of V over D by nn and identify E with the matrix algebra Mn(D)\mathbf{M}_n(D) using a basis of V over D. The multiplicative group GLn(D)_n(D) of the algebra E is generated by the diagonal matrices and the matrices Bij(λ)B_{ij}(\lambda ) (II, §10, No. 13, p. 362, Corollary 1). Proposition 9 therefore follows from the two specific cases below.

A) Suppose that uu is the diagonal matrix diag(a1,...,ana_1, . . . , a_n). For every 1⩽i⩽n1\leqslant i\leqslant n, let LiL_i be a maximal commutative subfield of D containing aia_i; let L be the subalgebra of E consisting of the diagonal matrices diag(t1,...,tnt_1, . . . , t_n) with ti∈Lit_i\in L_i for 1⩽i⩽n1\leqslant i\leqslant n. Let dd be the reduced degree of D over K. We have [Li:K]=d[L_i: K] =d for 1⩽i⩽n1\leqslant i\leqslant n (VIII, p. 265, Corollary 2). The K-algebra L is isomorphic to L1×⋯×LnL_1\times \cdots \times L_n and therefore semisimple of degree ndnd; now, we have [E:K]=n2[D:K]=n2d2=[L:K]2[E : K] =n^2[D : K] =n^2d^2= [L : K]^2. It follows that L is a maximal commutative semisimple subalgebra of E (VIII, p. 262, Proposition 3). By Proposition 7 of VIII, p. 346, we have NrdE/K(u)=NL/K(u)_{E/K}(u) = N_{L/K}(u). Consequently, by formula (18) of III, §9, No. 3, p. 544, we have

NrdE/K(u)=∏i=1nNLi/K(ai)=∏i=1n_{E/K}(u) =\prod_{i=1}^nN_{L_i/K}(a_i) =\prod_{i=1}^n NrdD/K(ai)_{D/K}(a_i)

= NrdD/K(a1⋯an)=_{D/K}(a_1\cdots a_n) = Nrd(π(a1⋯an)\pi (a_1\cdots a_n)).

Moreover, we have det u=π(a1⋯an)u=\pi (a_1\cdots a_n) by Proposition 3 of VIII, p. 453, which gives formula (64) in this case.

B) Suppose that uu is equal to Bij(λ)B_{ij}(\lambda ), where λ\lambda is an element of D and i,ji, j are distinct integers in the interval [1,n][1, n]. Denote by dd the reduced degree of D over K and by M the vector space over K deduced from V by restriction of scalars from D to K. Then M is a simple E-module, and we have

(65) PcM/K(u;X)=_{M/K}(u; X) = PcrdE/K(u;X)d_{E/K}(u; X)^d

by formula (26) of VIII, p. 341. Moreover, M is a vector space of dimension nd2nd^2 over K, and u−1Mu-1_M is a nilpotent endomorphism of M; we therefore have

(66) PcM/K(u;X)=(X−1)nd2_{M/K}(u; X) = (X-1)^{nd^2}.

By comparing formulas (65) and (66), we obtain

(67) PcrdE/K(u;X)=(X−1)nd_{E/K}(u; X) = (X-1)^{nd}

and, in particular, NrdE/K(u)=1_{E/K}(u) = 1. We also have det u=1u= 1 by Proposition 3 of VIII, p. 453; formula (64) therefore holds in this case.

Remark 00L3

We have NrdE/K(u)=0_{E/K}(u) = 0 if the element uu of E is not invertible (VIII, p. 340, Proposition 3).

Exercises

See the exercises for § 17.

Transcribed from the printed edition, 2023, Springer Nature. Not translated.