Proposition 5
Tag 00KQ, permanent. Cite it as [Bourbaki, Tag 00KQ].
Algebra, VIII, p. 343, § 17. Reduced Norms and Traces
For any in A, let be the linear form Trd on A.
a) The mapping is an isomorphism of -bimodules from A to its dual Hom.
b) Let be a linear form on A. The following properties are equivalent:
(i) There exists an element of K such that Trd
for every .
(ii) We have for all in A.
Recall (II, §1, No. 14, p. 225–226) that the , A)-bimodule structure on Hom is defined by the relation
for and . In particular, for every in A, we have
Trd,
Trd,
and these two elements are equal by formula (37) of VIII, p. 342. We therefore have , which means that is a homomorphism of , A)-bimodules from A to .
We choose an extension L of the field K and an isomorphism from the L-algebra to the matrix algebra (VIII, p. 252, Theorem 1). We identify the vector space with the dual of the vector space over the field L. By Proposition 4 of VIII, p. 341, with these conventions, we have
(44) Trd Trd.
Let be the L-linear mapping from to deduced from by extension of scalars; by formula (44) and Corollary 1, we have
(45) Trd Tr()
for in . By Proposition 7 of II, §10, No. 11, p. 358, the mapping is bijective; it follows that is bijective. We have proved a).
Let be in ; by the above, there exists an element of A such that is equal to . By a), we have
Consequently, the relation “ for in A” is equivalent to “ for every A”, and by part a) of the proof, this means that belongs to the center K of A. This proves b) in view of formula (36).
Bourbaki sets the proof directly after the statement, and the corpus does not separate them, so what is above is the statement and its proof together.
Cited by
Cites
- II, §1, No. 14, p. 225
- Proposition 7 of II, §10, No. 11, p. 358 not in this corpus
- VIII, p. 252, Theorem 1
- VIII, p. 342
- Proposition 4 of VIII, p. 341
- Corollary 1