Bourbaki

Proposition 9

Tag 00N4, permanent. Cite it as [Bourbaki, Tag 00N4].

Algebra, VIII, p. 391, § 20. Linear Representations of Algebras

Let Θ be a linear subspace of Θ(A). The following properties are equivalent:

(i) Θ is an (A,A)(A,A)-sub-bimodule of Θ(A).

(ii) Θ is a subcogebra of Θ(A).

(iii) There exists a hereditary set C\mathscr{C} of classes of A-modules of finite dimension over K such that Θ=ΘC(A)\Theta = \Theta_{\mathscr{C}}(A).

When these properties hold, the set C\mathscr{C} mentioned in (iii) is uniquely determined.

The last assertion follows from the corollary of VIII, p. 388: the set C\mathscr{C} consists of the classes of A-modules E of finite dimension over K such that ΘE(A)\Theta_E(A) is contained in Θ.

(iii) ⇒\Rightarrow (ii): Let C\mathscr{C} be a hereditary set of classes of A-modules of finite dimension over K. Then ΘC(A)\Theta_{\mathscr{C}}(A) is the union of the directed family (ΘE(A))E∈C(\Theta_E(A))_{E\in\mathscr{C}}. Since ΘE(A)\Theta_E(A) is a subcogebra of Θ(A) for every E∈CE\in \mathscr{C} (VIII, p. 390, formula (19)), the same holds for ΘC(A)\Theta_{\mathscr{C}}(A).

(ii) ⇒\Rightarrow (i): Let f∈Θ(A)f\in \Theta (A). Let f1′,...,fn′,f1′′,...,fn′′f'_1, . . . , f'_n, f''_1, . . . , f''_n be elements of Θ(A) satisfying c(f)=∑fi′⊗fi′′c(f) =\sum f'_i\otimes f''_i. For a,ba,b in A, we have f(ab)=∑fi′(a)fi′′(b)f(ab) =\sum f'_i(a)f''_i(b), and therefore

bf=∑i=1nfi′′(b)fi′,fa=∑i=1nfi′(a)fi′′ bf=\sum_{i=1}^nf''_i(b)f'_i,f a=\sum_{i=1}^nf'_i(a)f''_i

(VIII, p. 375, formulas (3) and (4)). Consequently, a subcogebra of Θ(A) is an (A(A, A)-sub-bimodule.

(i) ⇒\Rightarrow (iii): Suppose that Θ is an (A(A, A)-sub-bimodule of Θ(A); let C\mathscr{C} be the set of classes of A-modules E of finite dimension over K such that ΘE(A)\Theta_E(A) is contained in Θ. The set C\mathscr{C} is hereditary (VIII, p. 377, Remark 2), and we have ΘC(A)⊂Θ\Theta_{\mathscr{C}}(A)\subset \Theta by construction. Let f∈Θf\in \Theta and E=AfE = Af. Then E is finite-dimensional over K. Consequently, every linear form on E is of the form ua:g↦g(a)u_a:g\mapsto g(a) with aa in A (II, §7, No. 5, p. 302, Corollary 2). Now, for a,b,x∈Aa, b, x\in A, we have

cE(af,ub)(x)=⟨ub,xaf⟩=f(bxa)=afb(x) c_E(af, u_b)(x) =\langle u_b, xaf\rangle =f(bxa) =af b(x)

so that cE(af,ub)=afbc_E(af, u_b) =af b. We therefore have ΘE(A)⊂Θ\Theta_E(A)\subset \Theta. Consequently, the A-module E is of type C\mathscr{C}, and ff is one of its coefficients. We therefore have Θ⊂ΘC(A)\Theta \subset \Theta_{\mathscr{C}}(A) and, finally, Θ=ΘC(A)\Theta = \Theta_{\mathscr{C}}(A).

Bourbaki sets the proof directly after the statement, and the corpus does not separate them, so what is above is the statement and its proof together.

Cited by

Cites

Transcribed from the printed edition, 2023, Springer Nature. Not translated.