Proposition 9
Tag 00N4, permanent. Cite it as [Bourbaki, Tag 00N4].
Algebra, VIII, p. 391, § 20. Linear Representations of Algebras
Let Θ be a linear subspace of Θ(A). The following properties are equivalent:
(i) Θ is an -sub-bimodule of Θ(A).
(ii) Θ is a subcogebra of Θ(A).
(iii) There exists a hereditary set of classes of A-modules of finite dimension over K such that .
When these properties hold, the set mentioned in (iii) is uniquely determined.
The last assertion follows from the corollary of VIII, p. 388: the set consists of the classes of A-modules E of finite dimension over K such that is contained in Θ.
(iii) (ii): Let be a hereditary set of classes of A-modules of finite dimension over K. Then is the union of the directed family . Since is a subcogebra of Θ(A) for every (VIII, p. 390, formula (19)), the same holds for .
(ii) (i): Let . Let be elements of Θ(A) satisfying . For in A, we have , and therefore
(VIII, p. 375, formulas (3) and (4)). Consequently, a subcogebra of Θ(A) is an , A)-sub-bimodule.
(i) (iii): Suppose that Θ is an , A)-sub-bimodule of Θ(A); let be the set of classes of A-modules E of finite dimension over K such that is contained in Θ. The set is hereditary (VIII, p. 377, Remark 2), and we have by construction. Let and . Then E is finite-dimensional over K. Consequently, every linear form on E is of the form with in A (II, §7, No. 5, p. 302, Corollary 2). Now, for , we have
so that . We therefore have . Consequently, the A-module E is of type , and is one of its coefficients. We therefore have and, finally, .
Bourbaki sets the proof directly after the statement, and the corpus does not separate them, so what is above is the statement and its proof together.
Cited by
Cites
- II, §7, No. 5, p. 302, Corollary 2 not in this corpus
- VIII, p. 375
- VIII, p. 388
- VIII, p. 390
- VIII, p. 377, Remark 2