Bourbaki

Example 3

Tag 00Q9, permanent. Cite it as [Bourbaki, Tag 00Q9].

Algebra, VIII, p. 454, Appendix 2. Determinants over a Noncommutative Field

Suppose n⩾1n\geqslant 1. For every invertible diagonal matrix of the form Δ = diag(d1,...,dnd_1, . . . , d_n), we have ΔBij(λB_{ij}(\lambda)Δ−1=Bij(diλdj−1)^{-1}=B_{ij}(d_i\lambda d^{-1}_j). Let A be an element of GLn(D)\mathbf{G}\mathbf{L}_n(D). By Corollary 1 of II, §10, No. 13, p. 362 and the previous formula, there exist matrices P and Δ in GLn(D)\mathbf{G}\mathbf{L}_n(D) such that A = PΔ, that P is the product of matrices of the form Bij(λ)B_{ij}(\lambda ), and that Δ is a diagonal matrix of the form diag(1,...,1,d, . . . ,1, d). We have det(P) = 1 by Example 1, and therefore det(A) = det(Δ) =π(d)=\pi (d) by Proposition 3.

Bourbaki sets the proof directly after the statement, and the corpus does not separate them, so what is above is the statement and its proof together.

Cited by

Cites

Transcribed from the printed edition, 2023, Springer Nature. Not translated.