Bourbaki

Lemma 1

Tag 00VU, permanent. Cite it as [Bourbaki, Tag 00VU].

Lie Groups and Lie Algebras, chapter VII, § 4. Regular elements of a Lie group

Let M be an analytic manifold over kk and a=(a0,...,an−1,an=1)a= (a_0, . . . , a_{n-1}, a_n= 1) a sequence of analytic functions on M. For all x∈Mx\in M, let ra(x)r_a(x) be the upper bound of those i∈0,ni\in 0, n such that aj(x)=0a_j(x) = 0 for j<ij < i and let ra0(x)r_a^0(x) be the upper bound of those i∈0,ni\in 0, n such that aja_j is zero on a neighbourhood of xx for j<ij < i.

(i) The function rar_a is upper semi-continuous.

(ii) For all x∈M,ra0(x)=x\in M,r_a^0(x) = lim infy→xra(y)_{y\rightarrow x}r_a(y).

(iii) The function ra0r_a^0 is locally constant.

(iv) The set of points x∈Mx\in M such that ra0(x)=ra(x)r^0_a(x) =r_a(x) is the set of points of M on a neighbourhood of which rar_a is constant. This is a dense open subset of M. If k=Ck=\mathbf{C} and M is finite dimensional and connected, it is open and connected.

(i) If ra(x)=ir_a(x) =i, then ai(x)≠0a_i(x)\not= 0 and, for all yy in a neighbourhood of xx, we have ai(y)≠0a_i(y)\not= 0, so ra(y)≤ir_a(y)\leq i.

(ii) If ra0(x)=ir^0_a(x) =i, the functions a0,...,ai−1a_0, . . . , a_{i-1} are zero on a neighbourhood of xx and, for any yy in this neighbourhood, ra(y)≥ir_a(y)\geq i. Consequently, lim infy→xra(y)≥i_{y\rightarrow x}r_a(y)\geq i. Every neighbourhood of xx contains a point yy such that ai(y)≠0a_i(y)\not= 0 and hence ra(y)≤ir_a(y)\leq i. Thus lim infy→xra(y)=i_{y\rightarrow x}r_a(y) =i.

(iii) Let i=ra0(x)i=r_a^0(x) and let V be a neighbourhood of xx such that aj(y)=0a_j(y) = 0 for all y∈Vy\in V and all j<ij < i. Then x∈Mx\in M-- Z, where Z denotes the set of points of M in a neighbourhood of which the function aia_i is zero. Since Z is closed in M (Differentiable and Analytic Manifolds, Results,5.3.5, 5.3.5),V∩(M, V\cap (M -- Z) is a neighbourhood of xx. For every point yy in this neighbourhood, ra0(y)=ir_a^0(y) =i.

(iv) The function ra−ra0r_a-r_a^0 is upper semi-continuous and its value at any point is ≥0\geq 0. If ra(x)=ra0(x),ra−ra0r_a(x) =r^0_a(x),r_a-r^0_a is zero on a neighbourhood of xx, which shows that rar_a is constant on a neighbourhood of xx by (iii). Conversely, if rar_a is constant on a neighbourhood of xx, then ra0(x)=ra(x)r_a^0(x) =r_a(x) by (ii). The set of points x∈Mx\in M such that ra0(x)=ra(x)r_a^0(x) =r_a(x) is thus an open subset Ω\Omega of M. If x∈Mx\in M and if ra0(x)<ra(x)r^0_a(x)< r_a(x), every neighbourhood of xx contains a point yy such that ra(y)<ra(x)r_a(y)< r_a(x) and ra0(y)=ra0(x)r^0_a(y) =r_a^0(x). Every neighbourhood of xx thus contains a point yy such that

ra(y)−ra0(y)<ra(x)−ra0(x) r_a(y)-r^0_a(y)< r_a(x)-r^0_a(x)

It follows that Ω\Omega is dense in M.

If M is connected and if pp is the value of ra0r_a^0 on M, the points of Ω\Omega are the points x∈Mx\in M such that ap(x)≠0a_p(x)\not= 0. If k=Ck=\mathbf{C}, this implies that Ω\Omega is connected by Lemma 3 of Appendix II.

Let ρ\rho be an analytic linear representation of G on a vector space V of finite dimension nn over kk. Put

det(T −ρ(g)+1-\rho (g) + 1) =a0(g)+a1(g)T+⋯+an−1(g)Tn−1+Tn=a_0(g) +a_1(g)T +\cdots +a_{n-1}(g)T^{n-1}+ T^n.

The functions rar_a and ra0r_a^0 associated to the sequence (a0,a1,...,an−1,1)(a_0, a_1, . . . , a_{n-1},1) will be denoted by rρr_{\rho} and rρ0r^0_{\rho}, respectively. Then, for all g∈Gg\in G,

rρ(g)=r_{\rho}(g) = dim V1(ρ(g))V^1(\rho (g))

rρ0(g)=r_{\rho}^0(g) = lim infg′→g_{g'\rightarrow g} dim V1(ρ(g′))V^1(\rho (g')).

Bourbaki sets the proof directly after the statement, and the corpus does not separate them, so what is above is the statement and its proof together.

Cited by

Cites

Nothing.

Transcribed from the printed volume. Not translated.