Bourbaki

Proposition 1

Tag 00XX, permanent. Cite it as [Bourbaki, Tag 00XX].

Lie Groups and Lie Algebras, chapter VIII, § 1. The Lie algebra sl(2, k) and its representations

Let E be an sl(2,k)\mathfrak{s}\mathfrak{l}(2, k)-module, and ee a primitive element of E of weight λ\lambda. Put en=(−1)nnX−nee_n=\frac{(-1)^n}{n}X_-^ne for n≥0n\geq 0, and e−1=0e_{-1}= 0. Then

Hen=(λ−2n)en He_n= (\lambda -2n)e_n
X−en=−(n+1)en+1(2) X_-e_n=-(n+ 1)e_{n+1} \tag{2}
X+en=(λ−n+1)en−1 X_+e_n= (\lambda -n+ 1)e_{n-1}

The first formula follows from Lemma 3, and the second from the definition of the ene_n. We prove the third by induction on nn. It is satisfied for n=0n= 0 since e−1=0e_{-1}= 0. If n>0n >0,

nX+en=−X+X−en−1=−[X+,X−]en−1−X−X+en−1 nX_+e_n=-X_+X_-e_{n-1}=-[X_+, X_-]e_{n-1}-X_-X_+e_{n-1}
=Hen−1−X−(λ−n+2)en−2 =He_{n-1}-X_-(\lambda -n+ 2)e_{n-2}
=(λ−2n+2+(n−1)(λ−n+2))en−1 = (\lambda -2n+ 2 + (n-1)(\lambda -n+ 2))e_{n-1}
=n(λ−n+1)en−1 =n(\lambda -n+ 1)e_{n-1}

Bourbaki sets the proof directly after the statement, and the corpus does not separate them, so what is above is the statement and its proof together.

Cited by

Cites

Transcribed from the printed volume. Not translated.