(i) The subalgebras of g stable under adh are the vector subspaces of the form h′+gP, where P is a closed subset of R and h′ is a vector subspace of h containing hP∩(−P).
(ii) Let h′,h′′ be vector subspaces of h and P,Q closed subsets of R, with h′⊃hP∩(−P),h′′⊂h′ and Q⊂P. Then h′′+gQ is an ideal of h′+gP if and only if
(P+Q)∩R⊂Q and hP∩(−Q)⊂h′′⊂⋂α∈P,α∈/Q Ker α.
Assertion (i) follows immediately from Lemmas 1 and 2. Let h′,h′′,P,Q be as in (ii). Then
[h′+gP,h′′+gQ]=hP∩(−Q)+[h′,gQ]+[h′′,gP]+g(P+Q)∩R
Hence, h′′+gQ is an ideal of h′+gP if and only if
hP∩(−Q)⊂h′′,[h′′,gP]⊂gQ,g(P+Q)∩R⊂gQ
This implies (ii).
Bourbaki sets the proof directly after the statement, and the corpus does not separate them, so what is above is the statement and its proof together.
Nothing.