Let (g,h,B,(Xα)α∈B) and (g′,h′,B′,(Xα′)α∈B′) be framed semi-simple Lie algebras, let R and R′ be the root systems of (g,h) and (g′,h′), let (n(α,β))α,β∈B (resp. (n′(α,β))α,β∈B′) be the Cartan matrix of R (resp. R′) relative to B (resp. B′), and let Δ (resp. Δ′) be the Dynkin graph of R (resp. R′) relative to B (resp. B′).
(i) If φ is an isomorphism from h∗ to h′∗ such that φ(R)=R′ and φ(B)=B′, there exists a unique isomorphism ψ from (g,h,B,(Xα)α∈B) to (g′,h′,B′,(Xα′)α∈B′) such that ψ∣h=tφ−1.
(ii) If f is a bijection from B to B′ such that n′(f(α),f(β))=n(α,β) for all α,β∈ B, there exists an isomorphism from (g,h,B,(Xα)α∈B) to (g′,h′,B′,(Xα′)α∈B′).
(iii) If there exists an isomorphism from Δ to Δ′, there exists an isomorphism from (g,h,B,(Xα)α∈B) to (g′,h′,B′,(Xα′)α∈B′).
This follows immediately from Prop. 4 (i) (making use of Chap. VI, §4, no. 2, Prop. 1 for part (iii)).
Bourbaki sets the proof directly after the statement, and the corpus does not separate them, so what is above is the statement and its proof together.