Bourbaki

Proposition 15

Tag 01CX, permanent. Cite it as [Bourbaki, Tag 01CX].

Lie Groups and Lie Algebras, chapter IX, § 4. Root system associated to a compact group

Let φ\varphi be an isomorphism from D∗(G′,T′)D^*(G',T') to D∗(G,T)D^*(G,T) (resp. from D∗(G,T)D_*(G,T) to D∗(G′,T′)D_*(G',T')). There exists an isomorphism f:G→G′f: G\rightarrow G' such that f(T)=T′f(T) = T' and φ=D∗(f)\varphi = D^*(f) (resp. φ=D∗(f)\varphi = D_*(f)); if f1f_1 and f2f_2 are two such isomorphisms, there exists an element tt of T such that f2=f1∘f_2=f_1\circ Int tt.

The second assertion follows immediately from Prop. 9 (no. 4); we prove the first for the covariant diagrams, for example. Denote by g′\mathfrak{g}' (resp. t′\mathfrak{t}') the Lie algebra of G′G' (resp. T′T'), and by gC′\mathfrak{g}'_{\mathbf{C}} (resp. tC′\mathfrak{t}'_{\mathbf{C}}) its complexified Lie algebra. By Chap. VIII, §4, no. 4, Th. 2 (i), there exists an isomorphism ψ:gC→gC′\psi :\mathfrak{g}_{\mathbf{C}}\rightarrow \mathfrak{g}'_{\mathbf{C}} that maps tC\mathfrak{t}_{\mathbf{C}} to tC′\mathfrak{t}'_{\mathbf{C}} and induces on Γ(T)⊂tC\Gamma (T)\subset \mathfrak{t}_{\mathbf{C}} the given isomorphism φ:Γ(T)→Γ(T′)\varphi :\Gamma (T)\rightarrow \Gamma (T'). Then g\mathfrak{g} and ψ−1(g′)\psi^{-1}(\mathfrak{g}') are two compact forms of gC\mathfrak{g}_{\mathbf{C}} that have the same intersection t\mathfrak{t} with tC\mathfrak{t}_{\mathbf{C}}; by §3, no. 2, Prop. 3, there exists an inner automorphism θ\theta of gC\mathfrak{g}_{\mathbf{C}} inducing the identity on tC\mathfrak{t}_{\mathbf{C}} and such that θ(g)=ψ−1(g′)\theta (\mathfrak{g}) =\psi^{-1}(\mathfrak{g}'). By replacing ψ\psi by ψ∘θ\psi \circ \theta, we can assume that ψ\psi maps g\mathfrak{g} to g′\mathfrak{g}'. Further, by Prop. 4 of no. 2, there exists a unique morphism fT:T→T′f_T: T\rightarrow T' such that Γ(fT)=φ\Gamma (f_T) =\varphi. Then the restriction of ψ\psi to t\mathfrak{t} is L(fT)L(f_T), and by §2, no. 6, Prop. 8, there exists a unique morphism f:G→G′f: G\rightarrow G' that induces fTf_T on T and ψ\psi on gC\mathfrak{g}_{\mathbf{C}}. Applying the preceding to φ−1\varphi^{-1} and ψ−1\psi^{-1} we obtain an inverse morphism to ff, which is therefore an isomorphism. Then D∗(f)=Γ(fT)=φD_*(f) =\Gamma (f_T) =\varphi, hence the proposition.

Note that, if T and T′T' are two maximal tori of G, the diagrams D∗(G,T)D^*(G,T) and D∗(G,T′)D^*(G,T') are isomorphic (if g∈Gg\in G is such that gTg−1=T′gTg^{-1}= T', then Int gg is an isomorphism from G to G that maps T to T′T'). Denote by D∗(G)D^*(G) the isomorphism class of D∗(G,T)D^*(G,T) (cf. Theory of Sets, Chap. II, §6, no. 2); this is a root diagram that depends only on G and is called the contravariant diagram of G. The covariant diagram D∗(G)D_*(G) of G is defined similarly, and we obtain:

Bourbaki sets the proof directly after the statement, and the corpus does not separate them, so what is above is the statement and its proof together.

Cited by

Cites

Transcribed from the printed volume. Not translated.