Bourbaki

Proposition 8

Tag 017O, permanent. Cite it as [Bourbaki, Tag 017O].

Lie Groups and Lie Algebras, chapter VIII, § 11. Classes of nilpotent elements and sl2 -triplets

Assume that g\mathfrak{g} is semi-simple ≠0\not= 0. Let h\mathfrak{h} be a splitting Cartan subalgebra of g\mathfrak{g}, R the root system of (g,h)(\mathfrak{g},\mathfrak{h}), B a basis of R,h0,h^0 the element of h\mathfrak{h} such that α(h0)=2\alpha (h^0) = 2 for all α∈B\alpha \in B.

(i) The element h0h^0 is simple and principal.

(ii) The elements xx of g\mathfrak{g} such that there exists an sl2\mathfrak{s}\mathfrak{l}_2-triplet of the form (x,h0,y)(x, h^0, y) are the elements of ∑α∈Bgα\sum_{\alpha\in B}\mathfrak{g}^{\alpha} that have a non-zero component in each gα\mathfrak{g}^{\alpha}.

The element h0h^0 is that considered in §7, no. 5, Lemma 2 (cf. loc. cit., formula (1)). It follows from this lemma that h0h^0 is simple principal and that, if x∈∑α∈Bgαx\in \sum_{\alpha\in B}\mathfrak{g}^{\alpha} has a non-zero component in each gα\mathfrak{g}^{\alpha}, there exists an sl2\mathfrak{s}\mathfrak{l}_2-triplet of the form (x,h0,y)(x, h^0, y). Conversely, let (x,h0,y)(x, h^0, y) be a sl2\mathfrak{s}\mathfrak{l}_2-triplet. We have [h0,x]=2x[h^0, x] = 2x, so x∈∑γ∈R,γ(h0)=2gγ=∑α∈Bgαx\in \sum_{\gamma\in R,\gamma(h^0)=2}\mathfrak{g}^{\gamma}=\sum_{\alpha\in B}\mathfrak{g}^{\alpha}. Similarly, y∈∑α∈Bg−αy\in \sum_{\alpha\in B}\mathfrak{g}^{-\alpha}. Write

h0=∑α∈BaαHαh^0=\sum_{\alpha\in B}a_{\alpha}H_{\alpha} where aα>0a_{\alpha}>0 for all α∈B\alpha \in B,

x=∑α∈BXαx=\sum_{\alpha\in B}X_{\alpha} where Xα∈gαX_{\alpha}\in \mathfrak{g}^{\alpha} for all α∈B\alpha \in B,

y=∑α∈BX−αy=\sum_{\alpha\in B}X_{-\alpha} where X−α∈g−αX_{-\alpha}\in \mathfrak{g}^{-\alpha} for all α∈B\alpha \in B.

Then

∑α∈BaαHα=h0=[y,x]=∑α,β∈B[X−β,Xα]=∑α∈B[X−α,Xα] \sum_{\alpha\in B}a_{\alpha}H_{\alpha}=h^0= [y, x] =\sum_{\alpha ,\beta\in B}[X_{-\beta}, X_{\alpha}] =\sum_{\alpha\in B}[X_{-\alpha}, X_{\alpha}]

so [X−α,Xα]≠0[X_{-\alpha}, X_{\alpha}]\not= 0 for all α∈B\alpha \in B.

Bourbaki sets the proof directly after the statement, and the corpus does not separate them, so what is above is the statement and its proof together.

Cited by

Cites

Transcribed from the printed volume. Not translated.