Bourbaki

Lemma 9

Tag 017R, permanent. Cite it as [Bourbaki, Tag 017R].

Lie Groups and Lie Algebras, chapter VIII, § 11. Classes of nilpotent elements and sl2 -triplets

With the notations of Prop. 8, put gp=\mathfrak{g}^p= Ker(ad h0−ph^0-p) for p∈Zp\in \mathbf{Z}. Let g∗2\mathfrak{g}^2_* be the set of elements of g2=∑α∈Bgα\mathfrak{g}^2=\sum_{\alpha\in B}\mathfrak{g}^{\alpha} that have a non-zero component

in each gα\mathfrak{g}^{\alpha}. Let R+R_+ be the set of positive roots relative to B,n+=∑α∈R+gα,\mathfrak{n}_+=\sum_{\alpha\in R_+}\mathfrak{g}^{\alpha}, and x∈g∗2x\in \mathfrak{g}^2_*. Then eadn+.x=x+[n+,n+]e^{ad\mathfrak{n}_+}.x=x+ [\mathfrak{n}_+,\mathfrak{n}_+].

It is clear that eadn+.x⊂x+[n+,n+]e^{ad\mathfrak{n}_+}.x\subset x+ [\mathfrak{n}_+,\mathfrak{n}_+]. We prove that, if v∈[n+,n+]v\in [\mathfrak{n}_+,\mathfrak{n}_+], then x+v∈eadn+.xx+v\in e^{ad\mathfrak{n}_+}.x. Put n(p)=∑r≥pg2r\mathfrak{n}^{(p)}=\sum_{r\geq p}\mathfrak{g}^{2r}; it suffices to prove that

x+v∈eadn+.x+n(p) x+v\in e^{ad\mathfrak{n}_+}.x+\mathfrak{n}^{(p)}

for all p≥2p\geq 2. This is clear for p=2p= 2 since n(2)\mathfrak{n}^{(2)} =[n+,n+](= [\mathfrak{n}_+,\mathfrak{n}_+] (§3, no. 3, Prop. 9 (iii)). Assume that we have found z∈n+z\in \mathfrak{n}_+ such that v+x−eadz.x∈v+x-e^{adz}.x\in n(p)\mathfrak{n}^{(p)}. Since there exists an sl2\mathfrak{s}\mathfrak{l}_2-triplet of the form (x,h0,y)(x, h^0, y) (Prop. 8), §1, no. 2, Cor. of Prop. 2 proves that [x,g2p−2]=g2p[x,\mathfrak{g}^{2p-2}] =\mathfrak{g}^{2p}; hence, there exists z′∈g2p−2⊂n+z'\in \mathfrak{g}^{2p-2}\subset \mathfrak{n}_+ such that

v+x−eadz.x∈[z′,x]+n(p+1) v+x-e^{adz}.x\in [z', x] +\mathfrak{n}^{(p+1)}

So v+x∈ead(z+z′).x+n(p+1)v+x\in e^{ad(z+z')}.x+\mathfrak{n}^{(p+1)}, and our assertion is established by induction.

Bourbaki sets the proof directly after the statement, and the corpus does not separate them, so what is above is the statement and its proof together.

Cited by

Cites

Transcribed from the printed volume. Not translated.