With the notations of Prop. 8, put gp= Ker(ad h0−p) for p∈Z. Let g∗2 be the set of elements of g2=∑α∈Bgα that have a non-zero component
in each gα. Let R+ be the set of positive roots relative to B,n+=∑α∈R+gα, and x∈g∗2. Then eadn+.x=x+[n+,n+].
It is clear that eadn+.x⊂x+[n+,n+]. We prove that, if v∈[n+,n+], then x+v∈eadn+.x. Put n(p)=∑r≥pg2r; it suffices to prove that
x+v∈eadn+.x+n(p)
for all p≥2. This is clear for p=2 since n(2) =[n+,n+](§3, no. 3, Prop. 9 (iii)). Assume that we have found z∈n+ such that v+x−eadz.x∈ n(p). Since there exists an sl2-triplet of the form (x,h0,y) (Prop. 8), §1, no. 2, Cor. of Prop. 2 proves that [x,g2p−2]=g2p; hence, there exists z′∈g2p−2⊂n+ such that
v+x−eadz.x∈[z′,x]+n(p+1)
So v+x∈ead(z+z′).x+n(p+1), and our assertion is established by induction.
Bourbaki sets the proof directly after the statement, and the corpus does not separate them, so what is above is the statement and its proof together.