Bourbaki

Remark

Tag 01B2, permanent. Cite it as [Bourbaki, Tag 01B2].

Lie Groups and Lie Algebras, chapter IX, § 3. Compact forms of complex semi-simple Lie algebras

With the preceding notations, we have the following formulas:

[h,uα]=−iα(h)vα,[h,vα]=iα(h)uα,[uα,vα]=2iHα,(h∈h)(9) [h, u_{\alpha}] =-i\alpha (h)v_{\alpha},[h, v_{\alpha}] =i\alpha (h)u_{\alpha},[u_{\alpha}, v_{\alpha}] = 2iH_{\alpha},(h\in \mathfrak{h}) \tag{9}
[uα,uβ]=Nα,βuα+β+Nα,−βuα−β,α≠±β(10) [u_{\alpha}, u_{\beta}] = N_{\alpha ,\beta}u_{\alpha+\beta}+ N_{\alpha ,-\beta}u_{\alpha-\beta},\alpha \not=\pm \beta \tag{10}
[vα,vβ]=−Nα,βuα+β+Nα,−βuα−β,α≠±β(11) [v_{\alpha}, v_{\beta}] =-N_{\alpha ,\beta}u_{\alpha+\beta}+ N_{\alpha ,-\beta}u_{\alpha-\beta},\alpha \not=\pm \beta \tag{11}
[uα,vβ]=Nα,βvα+β−Nα,−βvα−β,α≠±β(12) [u_{\alpha}, v_{\beta}] = N_{\alpha ,\beta}v_{\alpha+\beta}-N_{\alpha ,-\beta}v_{\alpha-\beta},\alpha \not=\pm \beta \tag{12}

(in the last three formulas, it is understood, as usual, that Nγ,δ=0N_{\gamma ,\delta}= 0 if γ+δ\gamma +\delta is not a root).

Note that ∑Ruα\sum\mathbf{R}u_{\alpha} is a real subalgebra of a\mathfrak{a}, namely a0∩au\mathfrak{a}_0\cap \mathfrak{a}_u.

Let Q(R) be the group of radical weights of R (Chap. VI, §1, no. 9). Recall that to any homomorphism γ:Q(R)→C∗\gamma : Q(R)\rightarrow \mathbf{C}^* is associated an elementary automorphism f(γ)f(\gamma ) of a\mathfrak{a} such that f(γ)(h)=hf(\gamma )(h) =h for all h∈hh\in \mathfrak{h} and f(γ)Xα=f(\gamma )X_{\alpha}= γ(α)Xα\gamma (\alpha )X_{\alpha} (Chap. VIII, §5, no. 2).

Bourbaki sets the proof directly after the statement, and the corpus does not separate them, so what is above is the statement and its proof together.

Cited by

Nothing.

Cites

Transcribed from the printed volume. Not translated.