Proposition 4
Tag 01EH, permanent. Cite it as [Bourbaki, Tag 01EH].
Lie Groups and Lie Algebras, chapter IX, § 5. Conjugacy classes
a) Let , and let be the image of in . The following conditions are equivalent:
(i) (resp. ).
(i bis) The element (resp. ) is regular in G.
(ii) The map (resp. ) is a submersion at the point (resp. ).
(ii bis) The map (resp. ) is étale at the point (resp. ).
b) The map (resp. , resp. ) makes (resp. , resp. ) a principal covering of with group W (resp. , resp. ).
a) The equivalence of (i) and (i bis) is clear; that of (ii) and (ii bis) follows from the relations dim((G)) dim((G)) dim(G). By Lemma 4, is a submersion at the point if and only if Im(Ad Id), which means that is regular. Finally, since (Id exp) is étale at the point if and only if is étale at the point , exp ), which by the preceding means that belongs to .
b) The morphisms are thus étale. On the other hand, W operates freely on , and a fortiori on . Let in G and in be such that ; then Int maps to , and hence normalizes T, since , and the class of in W maps to . It follows that is a principal covering with group W; this immediately implies that is a principal covering with group , and hence by restriction to the connected component of , that is a principal covering with group .
Bourbaki sets the proof directly after the statement, and the corpus does not separate them, so what is above is the statement and its proof together.
Cited by
Nothing.