Bourbaki

Proposition 2

Tag 01IP, permanent. Cite it as [Bourbaki, Tag 01IP].

Lie Groups and Lie Algebras, chapter IX, Appendix 1. Structure of compact groups

Let G be a connected compact group.

a)C(G)0) C(G)_0 is a commutative connected compact group; D(G) is a connected compact group, equal to its derived group.

b) The continuous homomorphism (x,y)→xy(x, y) \rightarrow xy from C(G)0×D(G)C(G)_0\times D(G) to G is surjective and its kernel is a central subgroup of C(G)0×D(G)C(G)_0\times D(G) that is compact and totally discontinuous.

c) There exists a family (Sλ)λ∈L(S_{\lambda})_{\lambda\in L} of almost simple compact Lie groups and a surjective continuous homomorphism ∏λ∈LSλ→D(G)\prod_{\lambda\in L}S_{\lambda}\rightarrow D(G), whose kernel is a

totally discontinuous, compact, central subgroup.

Let (Gα,fαβ)(G_{\alpha}, f_{\alpha \beta}) be a projective system of compact Lie groups, relative to a filtered set I, such that G is isomorphic to lim←−Gα_{\leftarrow -}G_{\alpha} and such that the canonical maps fα:G→Gαf_{\alpha}: G\rightarrow G_{\alpha} are surjective (Cor. 2 of Prop. 1). For α∈I\alpha \in I, let πα:D~(Gα)→D(Gα)\pi_{\alpha}: \widetilde{D}(G_{\alpha})\rightarrow D(G_{\alpha}) be a universal covering of the group D(Gα)D(G_{\alpha}). The fαβf_{\alpha \beta} induce morphisms f~αβ:D~(Gβ)→D~(Gα)\widetilde{f}_{\alpha \beta}: \widetilde{D}(G_{\beta})\rightarrow \widetilde{D}(G_{\alpha}), and (D~(Gα),f~αβ)( \widetilde{D}(G_{\alpha}),\widetilde{f}_{\alpha \beta}) is a projective system of topological groups satisfying the hypotheses of Lemma 3.

It follows from this lemma that the topological group lim←−D~(Gα)_{\leftarrow -}\widetilde{D}(G_{\alpha}) is isomorphic to the product of a family (Sλ)λ∈L(S_{\lambda})_{\lambda\in L} of almost simple compact Lie groups. By Lemma 1, the limit of the projective system of homomorphisms (πα)(\pi_{\alpha}) can be identified with a continuous homomorphism π:∏λ∈LSλ→D(G)\pi :\prod_{\lambda\in L}S_{\lambda}\rightarrow D(G),

which is surjective (General Topology, Chap. I, §9, no. 6, Cor. 2 of Prop. 8).

Now observe that the group ∏λ∈LSλ\prod_{\lambda\in L}S_{\lambda} is equal to its derived group: this

follows from §4, no. 5, Cor. of Prop. 10. The same is true for D(G), since π\pi is surjective. Consequently, D(G)⊃D(D(G))=D(G)D(G)\supset D(D(G)) = D(G). Thus, the group D(G) is compact and equal to its derived group; this proves a), since the assertions concerning C(G)0C(G)_0 are trivial.

On the other hand, the kernel of π:∏λ∈LSλ→D(G)\pi :\prod_{\lambda\in L}S_{\lambda}\rightarrow D(G) can be identified

with lim←−_{\leftarrow -} Ker(πα\pi_{\alpha}) ((Algebra, Chap. II, §6, no. 1, Remark 1), and thus with a

compact, totally discontinuous, central subgroup, hence c).

We prove b). For all α\alpha in I, the morphism sα:C(Gα)0×D(Gα)→Gαs_{\alpha}: C(G_{\alpha})_0\times D(G_{\alpha})\rightarrow G_{\alpha} such that sα(x,y)=xys_{\alpha}(x, y) =xy for x∈C(Gα)0,y∈D(Gα)x\in C(G_{\alpha})_0, y\in D(G_{\alpha}), is surjective and its kernel is a finite central subgroup (§1, no. 4, Cor. 1 of Prop. 4). The sαs_{\alpha} form a projective system of maps, whose limit can, by the preceding, be identified with the homomorphism (x,y)→xy(x, y) \rightarrow xy from C(G)0×D(G)C(G)_0\times D(G) to G. We now see as before that this map is surjective and that its kernel is central and totally discontinuous, hence b).

Bourbaki sets the proof directly after the statement, and the corpus does not separate them, so what is above is the statement and its proof together.

Cited by

Nothing.

Cites

Transcribed from the printed volume. Not translated.