Bourbaki

Proposition 8

Tag 03M6, permanent. Cite it as [Bourbaki, Tag 03M6].

Theory of Sets, chapter III, § 5. Properties of integers

Let bb be an integer >1>1. For each integer k>0k>0 let EkE_k be the lexicographic product (§ 2, no. 6) of the family (Jh)0≤h≤k−1(J_h)_{0\leq h\leq k-1} of intervals all identical with [0,b−1][0,b-1]. For each r=(r0,r1,…,rk−1)∈Ekr=(r_0,r_1,\ldots,r_{k-1})\in E_k, let

fk(r)=∑h=0k−1rhbk−h−1;f_k(r)=\sum_{h=0}^{k-1}r_hb^{k-h-1};

then the mapping fkf_k is an isomorphism of the ordered set EkE_k onto the interval [0,bk−1][0,b^k-1].

The proof is by induction on kk. For k=1k=1 it is an immediate consequence of the definitions. For each r=(r0,…,rk−1,rk)∈Ek+1r=(r_0,\ldots,r_{k-1},r_k)\in E_{k+1} put

φ(r)=(r0,…,rk−1)∈Ek.\varphi(r)=(r_0,\ldots,r_{k-1})\in E_k.

Then the mapping r↦(φ(r),rk)r\mapsto(\varphi(r),r_k) is an isomorphism of Ek+1E_{k+1} onto the lexicographical product of EkE_k and J=[0,b−1]J=[0,b-1]; this is immediate from the definitions. We may write

fk+1(r)=b⋅fk(φ(r))+rk;f_{k+1}(r)=b\cdot f_k(\varphi(r))+r_k;

let us show that the relation r<r′r<r' in Ek+1E_{k+1} implies fk+1(r)<fk+1(r′)f_{k+1}(r)<f_{k+1}(r'). Indeed, we have either φ(r)<φ(r′)\varphi(r)<\varphi(r'), or else φ(r)=φ(r′)\varphi(r)=\varphi(r') and rk<rk′r_k<r'_k. In the first case, the inductive hypothesis implies that fk(φ(r))<fk(φ(r′))f_k(\varphi(r))<f_k(\varphi(r')), and therefore (§ 4, no. 2, Proposition 2) fk(q(r′))≥fk(φ(r))+1f_k(q(r'))\geq f_k(\varphi(r))+1; consequently

fk−1(r′)≥b⋅fk(φ(r))+b>fk+1(r),f_{k-1}(r')\geq b\cdot f_k(\varphi(r))+b>f_{k+1}(r),

since rk≤b−1r_k\leq b-1 (no. 2, Proposition 3). If, on the other hand, φ(r)=φ(r′)\varphi(r)=\varphi(r') and rk<rk′r_k<r'_k, it is clear that fk+1(r)<fk+1(r′)f_{k+1}(r)<f_{k+1}(r'). Now the inductive hypothesis shows that fk(φ(r))≤bk−1f_k(\varphi(r))\leq b^k-1, whence

fk+1(r)≤b(bk−1)+b−1=bk+1−1.f_{k+1}(r)\leq b(b^k-1)+b-1=b^{k+1}-1.

It follows that fk+1f_{k+1} is an isomorphism of Ek+1E_{k+1} onto a subset of the interval [0,bk+1−1][0,b^{k+1}-1]; but this interval and Ek+1E_{k+1} have the same number of elements, namely bk+1b^{k+1} (no. 3, Proposition 5); therefore fk+1f_{k+1} is a bijection (§ 4, no. 2, Proposition 2, Corollary 4), and the proof is complete. ¶ We note now that for every integer aa we have a<baa < b^a. This is proved by induction on aa; the result is evident for a=0a = 0, and the hypothesis a<baa < b^a implies a+1⩽ba<b⋅ba=ba+1a + 1 \leqslant b^a < b \cdot b^a = b^{a+1} (no. 2, Proposition 3 and § 4, no. 2, Proposition 2). There is therefore a least integer kk such that a<bka < b^k, and Proposition 8 then shows that there exists a unique finite sequence (rh)0⩽h⩽k−1(r_h)_{0 \leqslant h \leqslant k-1} such that 0⩽rh⩽b−10 \leqslant r_h \leqslant b - 1 for 0⩽h⩽k−10 \leqslant h \leqslant k - 1 and

a=∑h=0k−1rhbk−h−1.a = \sum_{h=0}^{k-1} r_h b^{k-h-1}.
Furthermore, we must have r0>0r_0 > 0, for otherwise a<bk−1a < b^{k-1} by virtue of Proposition 8. The expression
∑h=0k−1rhbk−h−1\sum_{h=0}^{k-1} r_h b^{k-h-1}
is called the expansion to base bb of the integer aa.

\* In all parts of mathematics which do not involve numerical computations, Proposition 8 is useful mainly when applied to a prime number bb. \*

When the integer bb is small enough for this to be practicable, we may represent each integer <b< b by a distinctive symbol called a digit. The digits which represent 0 and 1 are usually 0 and 1. Let aa be an integer and let ∑h=0k−1rhbk−h−1\sum_{h=0}^{k-1} r_h b^{k-h-1} be its expansion to base bb. If the integer kk which appears in this expansion is sufficiently small for this to be practicable, it is usual to associate with the integer aa the succession of symbols obtained by writing r0r1…rk−2rk−1r_0 r_1 \ldots r_{k-2} r_{k-1} from left to right and then replacing each integer rir_i by the digit which represents it; the symbol so obtained is called the numerical symbol associated with aa. One then often replaces aa by its numerical symbol in the terms and relations in which it appears.

For example, if C, Q, F, D are digits, the numerical symbols CQ, CQF, CQFD are respectively associated with Cb+Q\mathrm{C}b + \mathrm{Q}, Cb2+Qb+F\mathrm{C}b^2 + \mathrm{Q}b + \mathrm{F}, Cb3+Qb2+Fb+D\mathrm{C}b^3 + \mathrm{Q}b^2 + \mathrm{F}b + \mathrm{D}.

It follows from Proposition 8 that the numerical symbol associated with an integer aa is unique, and that if a<bka < b^k it contains at most kk digits. Notice that the numerical symbol associated with the integer bkb^k consists of the digit 1 followed by kk digits 0.

This system of representation of integers by numerical symbols is called the system of numeration to base bb. In practical numerical computations, the following systems are used : (a) the system to base 2, or the dyadic system, in which the digits are 0 and 1; (b) the decimal system, in which the digits are 00, 11, 22, 33, 44, 5=4+15 = 4 + 1, 6=5+16 = 5 + 1, 7=6+17 = 6 + 1, 8=7+18 = 7 + 1, 9=8+19 = 8 + 1, and in which bb is the integer 9+19 + 1 (whose numerical symbol in this system is therefore 10).

Since the Middle Ages the decimal system has been traditionally used in numerical calculations, and we shall use it in this series whenever we have occasion to write down an integer explicitly. We refer the reader to the part of this series devoted to numerical calculation for an account of methods for obtaining the numerical symbols associated with the sum, difference, product, and integral part of the quotient of two integers given by their numerical symbols.

Bourbaki sets the proof directly after the statement, and the corpus does not separate them, so what is above is the statement and its proof together.

Cited by

Cites

Transcribed from the printed edition, 2004, Springer. Not translated.