Proposition 8
Tag 03M6, permanent. Cite it as [Bourbaki, Tag 03M6].
Theory of Sets, chapter III, § 5. Properties of integers
Let be an integer . For each integer let be the lexicographic product (§ 2, no. 6) of the family of intervals all identical with . For each , let
then the mapping is an isomorphism of the ordered set onto the interval .
The proof is by induction on . For it is an immediate consequence of the definitions. For each put
Then the mapping is an isomorphism of onto the lexicographical product of and ; this is immediate from the definitions. We may write
let us show that the relation in implies . Indeed, we have either , or else and . In the first case, the inductive hypothesis implies that , and therefore (§ 4, no. 2, Proposition 2) ; consequently
since (no. 2, Proposition 3). If, on the other hand, and , it is clear that . Now the inductive hypothesis shows that , whence
It follows that is an isomorphism of onto a subset of the interval ; but this interval and have the same number of elements, namely (no. 3, Proposition 5); therefore is a bijection (§ 4, no. 2, Proposition 2, Corollary 4), and the proof is complete. ¶ We note now that for every integer we have . This is proved by induction on ; the result is evident for , and the hypothesis implies (no. 2, Proposition 3 and § 4, no. 2, Proposition 2). There is therefore a least integer such that , and Proposition 8 then shows that there exists a unique finite sequence such that for and
\* In all parts of mathematics which do not involve numerical computations, Proposition 8 is useful mainly when applied to a prime number . \*
When the integer is small enough for this to be practicable, we may represent each integer by a distinctive symbol called a digit. The digits which represent 0 and 1 are usually 0 and 1. Let be an integer and let be its expansion to base . If the integer which appears in this expansion is sufficiently small for this to be practicable, it is usual to associate with the integer the succession of symbols obtained by writing from left to right and then replacing each integer by the digit which represents it; the symbol so obtained is called the numerical symbol associated with . One then often replaces by its numerical symbol in the terms and relations in which it appears.
For example, if C, Q, F, D are digits, the numerical symbols CQ, CQF, CQFD are respectively associated with , , .
It follows from Proposition 8 that the numerical symbol associated with an integer is unique, and that if it contains at most digits. Notice that the numerical symbol associated with the integer consists of the digit 1 followed by digits 0.
This system of representation of integers by numerical symbols is called the system of numeration to base . In practical numerical computations, the following systems are used : (a) the system to base 2, or the dyadic system, in which the digits are 0 and 1; (b) the decimal system, in which the digits are , , , , , , , , , , and in which is the integer (whose numerical symbol in this system is therefore 10).
Since the Middle Ages the decimal system has been traditionally used in numerical calculations, and we shall use it in this series whenever we have occasion to write down an integer explicitly. We refer the reader to the part of this series devoted to numerical calculation for an account of methods for obtaining the numerical symbols associated with the sum, difference, product, and integral part of the quotient of two integers given by their numerical symbols.
Bourbaki sets the proof directly after the statement, and the corpus does not separate them, so what is above is the statement and its proof together.