Proposition 5
Tag 04DW, permanent. Cite it as [Bourbaki, Tag 04DW].
Commutative Algebra, chapter III, § 2. General results on filtered rings and modules
Let be a filtered group whose filtration consists of invariant subgroups of . The following conditions are equivalent:
(a) is a complete topological group.
(b) The associated Hausdorff group is complete.
(c) Every Cauchy sequence in is convergent.
If is commutative and written additively, these conditions are also equivalent to the following:
(d) Every family of elements of which converges to 0 with respect to the filter of complements of finite subsets of is summable in .
For a filter on to be a Cauchy filter (resp. a convergent filter), it is necessary and sufficient that its image under the canonical mapping be a Cauchy (resp. convergent) filter (General Topology, Chapter II, § 3, no. 1, Proposition 4); whence first of all the equivalence of (a) and (b); on the other hand, as is metrizable, the equivalence of (b) and (c) follows from Proposition 9 of General Topology, Chapter IX, § 2, no. 6.
Suppose now that is commutative. Suppose that is complete and let be a family of elements of which converge to 0 with respect to . For every neighbourhood of 0 in which is a subgroup of , there exists a finite subset of such that the condition implies ; then for every finite subset of not meeting , which shows that the family is summable (General Topology, Chapter III, § 5, no. 2, Theorem 1).
Conversely, suppose that condition (d) holds and let be a Cauchy sequence on ; the family is then summable and in particular the series with general term is convergent and hence the sequence is convergent.
Let be a filtered group whose filtration consists of normal subgroups of ; the quotient groups are discrete and hence complete, since the are open in . Let be the canonical mapping and for let be the canonical mapping ; is an inverse system of discrete groups with as indexing set (General Topology, Chapter III, § 7, no. 3). Let be the topological group the inverse limit of this inverse system and for all let be the canonical mapping; let be the inverse limit of the inverse system of mappings such that for all ; finally, let be the canonical mapping of to its Hausdorff completion ; as the are complete, there exists a unique topological group isomorphism such that (loc. cit., Corollary 1 to Proposition 2); we shall call it the canonical isomorphism of onto .
Let be another filtered group whose filtration consists of normal subgroups of and let be a homomorphism compatible with the filtrations (no. 4). Set ; for all , defines by taking quotients a homomorphism and the obviously form an inverse system of mappings; set . Moreover let be the Hausdorff completion of and the homomorphism derived from by passing to the Hausdorff completions (General Topology, Chapter II, § 3, no. 7, Proposition 15). It follows immediately from the definitions that if is identified with and with by means of the canonical isomorphisms, is identified with . We conclude in particular that, if, for all , is an isomorphism, then is an isomorphism of topological groups.
Examples of complete filtered groups and rings
Bourbaki puts the proof directly after the statement, so what is above is the statement and its proof together.