Let A be a commutative ring, m an ideal of A, E an A-module and (En) a filtration of the additive group E consisting offinitely generated sub-A-modules. Suppose that mEn⊂En+1 for all n. Let A′ be the graded subalgebra ∑n≥0mnXn of A[X] and E′ the graded A′-module ∑n≥0En⊗AAXn. The twofollowing conditions are equivalent: (a) The filtration (En) is m-good. (b) E′ is a finitely generated A′-module.
Suppose that mEn−1=En for n>n0≥0. For i≤n0, let (ei)i≤n0 be a finite system of generators of the A-module Ei. As the A-module En⊗AAXn is generated by the elements en,j⊗Xn for 0≤n≤n0 and is equal to
mn−n0En0⊗AAXn for
n>n0, the
A′-module
E′ is generated by the elements
en,j⊗Xn for
0≤n≤n0 and
1≤j≤rn; then it is certainly finitely generated.
Conversely, if E′ is a finitely generated A′-module, it is generated by a finite family of elements of the form ek⊗Xn(k), where ek∈En(k). Let n0 be the greatest of the integers n(k). Then for n≥n0 and f∈En,
f⊗Xn=k∑tk(ek⊗Xn(k)) where
tk∈A′; replacing if need be
t, by its homogeneous component of degree
n−n(k), we may assume that
tk=akXn−n(k), where
ak∈mn−n(k).
As the unique element Xn forms a basis of the A-module AX", the equation f⊗Xn=(∑kakek)⊗Xn implies f=∑kakek. Then En⊂mn−n0En0; since the opposite inclusion is obvious,
En=mn−n0En0,
whence En=mEn−1 for n>n0.
Bourbaki puts the proof directly after the statement, so what is above is the statement and its proof together.
Nothing.