Bourbaki

Proposition 12

Tag 04H0, permanent. Cite it as [Bourbaki, Tag 04H0].

Commutative Algebra, chapter III, § 3. m-adic topologies on Noetherian rings

Let AA be a commutative Noetherian ring, mm an ideal of AA, SS the multiplicative subset 1+m1 + m of AA and EE a finitely generated AA-module. Under these conditions:

(i) S−1AS^{-1}A is a Zariski ring with the (S−1mS^{-1}m)-adic topology.

(ii) The canonical mapping f:E→S−1Ef : E \to S^{-1}E is continuous if EE is given the m-adic topology and S−1ES^{-1}E the (S−1m)(S^{-1}m)-adic topology and f^:E→(S−1E)∧\hat{f} : E \to (S^{-1}E)^{\wedge} is an isomorphism.

Every element of 1+(S−1m)1 + (S^{-1}m) is of the form

1+(m/(1+m′))=(1+m+m′)/(1+m) 1 + (m/(1 + m')) = (1 + m + m')/(1 + m)
where m∈mm \in m and m′∈mm' \in m; it is therefore invertible in S−1AS^{-1}A, which proves that S−1mS^{-1}m is contained in the Jacobson radical of S−1AS^{-1}A; as S−1AS^{-1}A is Noetherian (Chapter II, § 2, no. 4, Corollary 2 to Proposition 10), S−1AS^{-1}A is a Zariski ring with the (S−1m)(S^{-1}m)-adic topology, which proves (i). Let us show (ii). For all n>0n > 0,
fˉ−1((S−1m)nE)=fˉ′(S−1(mnE))=mnE: \bar{f}^{-1}((S^{-1}m)^nE) = \bar{f}'(S^{-1}(m^nE)) = m^nE:
for clearly first of all f(mnE)⊂S−1mnEf(m^nE) \subset S^{-1}m^nE; conversely, let xx be an element of fˉ−1(S−1mnE)\bar{f}^{-1}(S^{-1}m^nE); then there exist elements m′,m′′m', m'' of mm and x′′∈mnEx'' \in m^nE such that (1+m′)((1+m′′)x−x′′)=0(1 + m')((1 + m'')x - x'') = 0, whence (1−m)x=x′(1 - m)x = x', where
m=−(m′+m′′+m′m′′)∈m m = -(m' + m'' + m'm'') \in m
and x′=(1+m′)x′′∈mnEx' = (1 + m')x'' \in m^nE; we conclude that
x=(1+m+⋯+mn−1)x′+mnx∈mnE. x = (1 + m + \cdots + m^{n-1})x' + m^n x \in m^nE.
This proves that ff is a strict morphism. Moreover, the kernel of ff, which is the set of x∈Ex \in E for which there exists some s∈Ss \in S such that sx=0sx = 0, is identical with the kernel of the canonical mapping j:E→E^j : E \to \hat{E} (no. 2, Proposition 5). Then there is a topological isomorphism f0:j(E)→f(E)f_0 : j(E) \to f(E) such that f=f0∘jf = f_0 \circ j; as f^\hat{f} is a topological isomorphism, the problem reduces to verifying that f(E)f(E) is dense in S−1ES^{-1}E. Now every element of S−1ES^{-1}E may be written as x/(1−m)x/(1 - m), where m∈mm \in m, and it is immediately verified that
x/(1−m)≡((1+m+⋯+mn−1)x)/1(modS−1mnE) x/(1 - m) \equiv ((1 + m + \cdots + m^{n-1})x)/1 \pmod{S^{-1}m^nE}
which completes the proof.

Bourbaki puts the proof directly after the statement, so what is above is the statement and its proof together.

Cited by

Nothing.

Cites

Transcribed from the printed volume. Not translated.