Let A be a ring and m an ideal of A such that the ordered pair (A,m) satisfies Hensel's conditions. Let f∈A{X}, a∈A and write e=f′(a). If f(a)≡0 (mod. e2m), then there exists b∈A such that f(b)=0 and b≡a (mod. em). If b' is another element of A such that f(b′)=0 and b′≡a(modm), then e(b−b′)=0. In particular, b is unique if e is not a divisor of zero in A.
Let f(a)=e2c where c∈m; formula (20) for n=1 gives
f(a+eh(y))=e2(c+y) and it is therefore sufficient to take
y=−c,
b=a+eh(−c). Moreover if
b=a+ex,b′=a+ex′,x∈m,x′∈m,f(b)=f(b′)=0, we deduce from (19) that
e2(g(x)−g(x′))=0. As
g(X)−g(Y)=(X−Y)u(X,Y), where
u is restricted and
u(0,0)=1,
g(x)−g(x′)=(x−x′)v, where
v∈A is invertible, for, since
m is closed,
v−1=u(x,x′)−1∈m and
m is contained in the Jacobson radical of
A; whence the relation
e(b−b′)=0.
Bourbaki puts the proof directly after the statement, so what is above is the statement and its proof together.
Nothing.