Proposition 1
Tag 04RD, permanent. Cite it as [Bourbaki, Tag 04RD].
Commutative Algebra, chapter V, § 3. Finitely generated algebras over a field
Let be a finitely generated algebra over a field and the algebraic closure of .
(i) If , there exists a -homomorphism from to .
(ii) Let be two -homomorphisms from to . For and to have the same kernel, it is necessary and sufficient that there exist a -automorphism of such that .
(iii) Let be an ideal of . For to be maximal, it is necessary and sufficient that it be the kernel of a k-homomorphism from to .
(iv) For an element of to be such that for every k-homomorphism from to , it is necessary and sufficient that be nilpotent.
Assertion (i) follows from no. 1, Corollary 3 to Theorem 1 applied replacing by , by , by the unit element of and by the canonical injection of into .
If is a k-homomorphism from to , is a subring of containing ; as is an algebraic extension of , is a field (Algebra, Chapter V, § 3, no. 2, Proposition 3) and, if is the kernel off, , isomorphic to , is therefore a field, which proves that is maximal. Conversely, if is a maximal ideal of , it follows from (i) that there exists a k-homomorphism from to and hence a k-homomorphism of to whose kernel contains ; but as is maximal, ; this proves (iii).
We now prove (ii). If is a k-automorphism of such that , clearly and have the same kernel. Conversely, suppose that and have the same kernel; then there exists a k-isomorphism of the field onto the field such that ; but by Algebra, Chapter V, § 6, no. 3, Proposition 7, extends to a k-automorphism of and hence .
Finally, if is such that , for every k-homomorphism from to , and hence since is a field. Conversely, suppose that is not nilpotent; then is a finitely generated -algebra (and therefore a finitely generated k-algebra) not reduced to 0 (Chapter 11, § 2, no. 1, Remark 3) and hence there exists a k-homomorphism from to by (i). If is the canonical homomorphism, is a k-homomorphism from to and , whence .
Let be a field and an extension field of ; an element of is called a zero in of an ideal of the polynomial ring if
for all .
Bourbaki puts the proof directly after the statement, so what is above is the statement and its proof together.