Bourbaki

Proposition 1

Tag 04S0, permanent. Cite it as [Bourbaki, Tag 04S0].

Commutative Algebra, chapter VI, § 1. Valuation rings

Let AA and BB be local rings such that AA is a subring of BB. The following conditions are equivalent: (a) m(A)⊂m(B)m(A) \subset m(B); (b) BB dominates AA; (c) the ideal Bm(A)Bm(A) generated by m(A)m(A) in BB does not contain 1.

If m(A)⊂m(B)m(A) \subset m(B), m(B)∩Am(B) \cap A is an ideal of AA which does not contain 1 and which contains the maximal ideal m(A)m(A); it is therefore equal to it and (a) implies (b). If BB dominates AA, the ideal Bm(A)Bm(A) is contained in m(B)m(B) and hence does not contain 1; thus (b) implies (c). If (c) holds, Bm(A)Bm(A) is contained in the unique maximal ideal m(B)m(B) of BB, whence (a).

Note that, if KK is a ring, the relation "B dominates A" is an order relation on the set of local subrings of KK.

Let AA and BB be two local rings such that BB dominates AA. The canonical injection A→BA \to B defines by taking quotients an isomorphism of the field κ(A)\kappa(A) onto a subfield of κ(B)\kappa(B); this isomorphism allows us to identify κ(A)\kappa(A) with a subfield of κ(B)\kappa(B).

Examples (1) Let AA be a Noetherian local ring and A^\hat{A} its completion; the local ring A^\hat{A} then dominates AA (Chapter 111, § 3, no. 5, Proposition 9). (2) Let BB be an integral domain, AA a subring of BB, p′p' a prime ideal of BB and p=A∩p′p = A \cap p'. Then pAp⊂p′Bp′pA_p \subset p'B_{p'}, so that Bp′B_{p'} dominates ApA_p.

Bourbaki puts the proof directly after the statement, so what is above is the statement and its proof together.

Cited by

Cites

Transcribed from the printed volume. Not translated.