Proposition 1
Tag 04S0, permanent. Cite it as [Bourbaki, Tag 04S0].
Commutative Algebra, chapter VI, § 1. Valuation rings
Let and be local rings such that is a subring of . The following conditions are equivalent: (a) ; (b) dominates ; (c) the ideal generated by in does not contain 1.
If , is an ideal of which does not contain 1 and which contains the maximal ideal ; it is therefore equal to it and (a) implies (b). If dominates , the ideal is contained in and hence does not contain 1; thus (b) implies (c). If (c) holds, is contained in the unique maximal ideal of , whence (a).
Note that, if is a ring, the relation "B dominates A" is an order relation on the set of local subrings of .
Let and be two local rings such that dominates . The canonical injection defines by taking quotients an isomorphism of the field onto a subfield of ; this isomorphism allows us to identify with a subfield of .
Examples (1) Let be a Noetherian local ring and its completion; the local ring then dominates (Chapter 111, § 3, no. 5, Proposition 9). (2) Let be an integral domain, a subring of , a prime ideal of and . Then , so that dominates .
Bourbaki puts the proof directly after the statement, so what is above is the statement and its proof together.