Bourbaki

Theorem 2

Tag 04S4, permanent. Cite it as [Bourbaki, Tag 04S4].

Commutative Algebra, chapter VI, § 1. Valuation rings

Let KK be a field and hh a homomorphism from a subring AA of KK to an algebraically closed field LL. Then there exist a valuation ring VV for KK and a homomorphism h′h' from VV to LL such that VV contains AA, h′h' extends hh and h′−1(O)=m(V){h'}^{-1}(O) = m(V).

Let S\mathfrak{S} be the set of homomorphisms of subrings of KK to LL, ordered by the relation of extension. This set is inductive; for if (hα)α∈I(h_\alpha)_{\alpha \in I} is a non-empty totally ordered family of elements of S\mathfrak{S} and BB, is the defining ring of hαh_\alpha, the BαB_\alpha form a totally ordered family of subrings of KK and their union BB is therefore a subring of KK; there therefore exists a unique mapping hˉ\bar{h} from BB to LL which extends the hαh_\alpha (Set Theory, Chapter II, § 4, no. 6, Proposition 7) and it is immediately seen that hˉ\bar{h} is a homomorphism from BB to LL. Zorn's Lemma then shows that there exists a maximal element h′h' of S\mathfrak{S} which extends hh. The defining ring VV of h′h' is a valuation ring of KK (Theorem 1); if pp is the kernel of h′h', h′h' can be extended to a homomorphism from VpV_p to LL (Chapter II, § 2, no. 1, Proposition 1), whence Vp=VV_p = V and p=m(V)p = m(V).

Bourbaki puts the proof directly after the statement, so what is above is the statement and its proof together.

Cited by

Cites

Transcribed from the printed volume. Not translated.