Bourbaki

Definition 1

Tag 04SN, permanent. Cite it as [Bourbaki, Tag 04SN].

Commutative Algebra, chapter VI, § 2. Places

Let E and E' be two sets each with an internal law of composition denoted by (x,y)↦x∗y(x, y) \mapsto x * y, not necessarily everywhere defined. A mapping f:E→E′f : E \to E' is a morphism if, for all x,yx, y in E such that f(x)∗f(y)f(x) * f(y) is defined, the composition x∗yx * y is also defined and:

(1)

f(x∗y)=f(x)∗f(y). f(x * y) = f(x) * f(y).
More briefly, we may say that formula (1) must hold every time the right hand side has a meaning.

The notion of morphism is distinct from that of representation (Algebra, Chapter I, § 1, no. 1), where it is demanded that equation (1) hold whenever the left hand side has a meaning. Of course, the two notions coincide for laws of composition everywhere defined.

Bourbaki puts the proof directly after the statement, so what is above is the statement and its proof together.

Cited by

Nothing.

Cites

Transcribed from the printed volume. Not translated.