Bourbaki

Corollary 2

Tag 04WU, permanent. Cite it as [Bourbaki, Tag 04WU].

Commutative Algebra, chapter VI, § 8. Extensions of a valuation to an algebraic extension

Let K be a field, v a discrete valuation on K with respect to which K is complete and L a finite extension of K of degree n. Then v admits a unique (upto equivalence) extension v′v' to L, the ring A' of v′v' is a finitely generated free module over the ring A of v and e(v′/v)f(v′/v)=ne(v'/v) f(v'/v) = n.

adic topology (where m=m(A)m = m(A)); the ring A is complete, for it is closed in K. We conclude that, since A′/mA′A'/mA' is a finite-dimensional vector (A/mA/m)-space (no. 4, Proposition 4), A' is a finitely generated A-module (Chapter III, § 2, no. 9, Corollary 3 to Proposition 12). It is therefore free and e(v′/v)f(v′/v)=ne(v'/v) f(v'/v) = n by

ϕ:K^⊗KL→∏i=1sL^i \phi : \hat{K} \otimes_K L \to \prod_{i=1}^s \hat{L}_i

(no. 2, Proposition 2). *is bijective. For all x∈Lx \in L, the characteristic polynomial PCL/K(x;X)P_{C_{L/K}}(x; X) is equal to the product of the characteristic polynomials PCL^i/Kˉ(x;X)P_{C_{\hat{L}_i/\bar{K}}}(x; X) (1≤i≤s1 \leq i \leq s); in particular,

{Tr⁡L/K(x)=∑i=1sTr⁡L^i/Kˉ(x)NL/K(x)=∏i=1sNL^i/Kˉ(x)v(NL/K(x))=∑i=1snivi′(x). \begin{cases} \operatorname{Tr}_{L/K}(x) = \sum_{i=1}^s \operatorname{Tr}_{\hat{L}_i/\bar{K}}(x) \\ N_{L/K}(x) = \prod_{i=1}^s N_{\hat{L}_i/\bar{K}}(x) \\ v(N_{L/K}(x)) = \sum_{i=1}^s n_i v_i'(x). \end{cases}

(The last relation in (9) is meaningful, for we may obviously assume that the vi′v_i', which are of height 1 by Corollary 2 to Proposition 1 of no. 1, take, as does v, their values in a subgroup of R\mathbf{R}.)

As no two of the vi′v'_i are equivalent and they are of height 1, they are independent and Proposition 2 of no. 2 shows therefore that e(vi′/v)f(vi′/v)≤nie(v'_i/v) f(v'_i/v) \leq n_i for all ii and ∑i=1sni≤n\sum_{i=1}^s n_i \leq n. The first assertion therefore follows from these inequalities and the relation ∑i=1se(vi′/v)f(vi′/v)=n\sum_{i=1}^s e(v'_i/v) f(v'_i/v) = n. Under the isomorphism ϕ\phi the endomorphism z↦z(1⊗x)z \mapsto z(1 \otimes x) of K^⊗KL\hat{K} \otimes_K L (for x∈Lx \in L) is transformed into the endomorphism of ∏i=1sL^i\prod_{i=1}^s \hat{L}_i leaving invariant each of the factors and reducing on each factor to multiplication by xx (LL being canonically imbedded in its completion L^i\hat{L}_i); whence the assertion relating to the characteristic polynomial of xx and the first two formulae of (9). Finally, let E be a finite quasi-Galois extension of K^\hat{K}, containing L^i\hat{L}_i; as K^\hat{K} is complete and ν^\hat{\nu} of height 1, there exists only one valuation (upto equivalence) ww on E extending ν^\hat{\nu} (no. 2, Corollary 1 to Proposition 2); then, for every K^\hat{K}-automorphism σ\sigma of E, w(σ(x))=vi′(x)w(\sigma(x)) = v'_i(x). Therefore

ϑ(NL^i/K^(x))=nivi′(x) \vartheta(N_{\hat{L}_i/\hat{K}}(x)) = n_i v'_i(x)
(Algebra, Chapter VIII, § 12, no. 2, formula (15)), which proves the formula of (9).

Bourbaki puts the proof directly after the statement, so what is above is the statement and its proof together.

Cited by

Cites

Transcribed from the printed volume. Not translated.