Bourbaki

Lemma 1

Tag 04XV, permanent. Cite it as [Bourbaki, Tag 04XV].

Commutative Algebra, chapter VI, § 9. Application: locally compact fields

Let x,yx, y be two permutable elements of AA such that x−y∈mj (j≥1)x - y \in m^j \ (j \geq 1); then xpn−ypn∈mj+nx^{p^n} - y^{p^n} \in m^{j+n} for every integer n≥0n \geq 0.

By induction on nn, it is reduced to proving the lemma for n=1n = 1. Then

xp−yp=(x−y)(xp−1+xp−2y+…+yp−1); x^p - y^p = (x - y)(x^{p-1} + x^{p-2}y + \ldots + y^{p-1});

the second factor is a sum of pp terms congruent to one another mod. mm and, as A/mA/m is of characteristic pp, p⋅1∈mp \cdot 1 \in m in AA and hence

xp−1+xp−2y+…+yp−1∈m; x^{p-1} + x^{p-2}y + \ldots + y^{p-1} \in m;

whence xp−yp∈mj+1x^p - y^p \in m^{j+1}.

We know that the multiplicative group (A/m)∗(A/m)^* is a cyclic group with q−1q - 1 elements (Algebra, Chapter V, § 11, no. 1, Theorem 1); let xx be a representative in AA of a generator of this group; then xq−x∈mx^q - x \in m, whence, by Lemma 1, xqn+1−xqn∈m1+fnx^{q^{n+1}} - x^{q^n} \in m^{1+fn}, since xqx^q and xx are permutable. This proves that (xqn)n≥0(x^{q^n})_{n \geq 0} is a Cauchy sequence in AA; as AA is compact and hence complete, this sequence has a limits in AA which obviously satisfies s≡x(modm)s \equiv x \pmod{m} and sq=ss^q = s. As s≠0s \neq 0, sq−1=1s^{q-1} = 1, more precisely ss is a primitive (q−1)(q-1)*-th root of unity* in AA. Clearly the set SS consisting of 00 and the powers sj (0≤j≤q−2)s^j \ (0 \leq j \leq q-2) is a system of representatives of the classes of AA mod. mm and is invariant under multiplication in AA.

Now let aa be a uniformizer for vv and consider the inner automorphism y↦a−1yay \mapsto a^{-1}ya of KK; it maps AA to itself, mm to itself and therefore, taking quotients, it defines an automorphism of the field A/mA/m; it is known (Algebra, Chapter V, § 11, no. 4, Proposition 5) that such an automorphism is of the form z↦zprz \mapsto z^{p^r}, where 0≤r≤f−10 \leq r \leq f-1. Then a−1sja≡sjpr(modm)a^{-1}s^j a \equiv s^{jp^r} \pmod{m} for 0≤j≤q−20 \leq j \leq q-2; as a∈ma \in m and s∉ms \notin m, this implies that s−jasjpr≡a(modm2)s^{-j}as^{jp^r} \equiv a \pmod{m^2}.

Let us write

u=∑i=0q−2s−1asipr. u = \sum_{i=0}^{q-2} s^{-1} a s^i p^r.

Then u≡(q−l)a≡−a(mod. m2)u \equiv (q - l) a \equiv -a (\text{mod. } m^2) since p.1∈mp . 1 \in m; we conclude that uu is also a uniformizer for vv; moreover (3)

s−1uspr=u s^{-1} u s^{p^r} = u
whence we deduce that u−1Su=Su^{-1} S u = S.

Finally, for all x∈Ax \in A there exists a unique sequence (si)(s_i) (i∈Ni \in \mathbf{N}) such that si∈Ss_i \in S for all ii and x≡∑siuix \equiv \sum s_i u^i (mod. mn+1m^{n+1}) for all n≥0n \geq 0: it is immediate by induction on nn, every element tt of mn+1m^{n+1} satisfying a relation of the form t≡t′un+1t \equiv t' u^{n+1} (mod. mn+2m^{n+2}), where t′t' is a uniquely determined element of SS. Then x=∑i=0∞siuix = \sum_{i=0}^{\infty} s_i u^i and the family (si)(s_i) satisfying this relation and such that si∈Ss_i \in S for all ii is determined uniquely.

Bourbaki puts the proof directly after the statement, so what is above is the statement and its proof together.

Cited by

Nothing.

Cites

Transcribed from the printed volume. Not translated.