Bourbaki

Theorem 5

Tag 053O, permanent. Cite it as [Bourbaki, Tag 053O].

Commutative Algebra, chapter VII, § 4. Modules over integrally closed Noetherian domains

Let T be a finitely generated torsion A-module. There exist two finite families (ni)i∈I(n_i)_{i \in I} and (pi)j∈I(p_i)_{j \in I}, where the nin_i are integers ≥1\geq 1 and the pip_i are prime ideals of AA of height 1 such that, if we write T′=⨁i∈IA/piniT' = \bigoplus_{i \in I} A/p_i^{n_i}, there exists a pseudo-isomorphism of TT to T′T'. Moreover, the families (ni)i∈I(n_i)_{i \in I} and (pi)i∈I(p_i)_{i \in I} with this property are unique to within a bijection of the indexing set and the pip_i contain the annihilator of TT.

Uniqueness: Iff: T→T′T \to T' is a pseudo-isomorphism and p∈P,fp:T,→Tp′p \in P, f_p : T, \to T'_p is an isomorphism. Now, Tp′T'_p is the direct sum of the Ap/pniApA_p/p^{n_i}A_p, the sum being over the indices ii such that pi=pp_i = p; the pniApp^{n_i}A_p are therefore the elementary divisors of the torsion AA-module TT, (Algebra, Chapter VII, § 4, no. 7); their uniqueness has been proved in Algebra, Chapter VII, § 4, no. 7, Proposition 7.

Existence: We may confine our attention to the case where T≠0T \neq 0. Let aa be the annihilator (non-zero and distinct from AA) of TT, pip_i (1≤i≤k1 \leq i \leq k) the prime ideals of AA of height 1 containing aa (which are finite in number (§1§ 1, no. 6, Theorem 4)) and S=⋂i(A−pi)S = \bigcap_i (A - p_i). The semi-local ring A′=S−1AA' = S^{-1}A is a principal ideal domain (Lemma 2) and has maximal ideals the mi=piA′m_i = p_iA'; as S−1TS^{-1}T is a finitely generated torsion AA-module, it is isomorphic to a finite direct sum ⨁j∈IA′/mϕ(j)nj\bigoplus_{j \in I} A'/m_{\phi(j)}^{n_j}, where ϕ\phi is a mapping of a finite set II to [1,k][1, k] (Algebra, Chapter VII, § 4, no. 7, Proposition 7); as A′/mϕ(j)njA'/m_{\phi(j)}^{n_j} is isomorphic to S−1(A/pϕ(j)nj)S^{-1}(A/p_{\phi(j)}^{n_j}) (Chapter II, § 2, no. 4), we have obtained a torsion AA-module T′T' of the desired type and an isomorphism f0f_0 of S−1TS^{-1}T onto S−1T′S^{-1}T'. As Hom⁡S−1A(S−1T,S−1T′)\operatorname{Hom}_{S^{-1}A}(S^{-1}T, S^{-1}T') is equal to S−1Hom⁡A(T,T′)S^{-1} \operatorname{Hom}_A(T, T') (Chapter 11, § 2, no. 7, Proposition 19), there exist s∈Ss \in S and a homomorphism f:T→T′f : T \to T' such that f0=s−1ff_0 = s^{-1}f. It remains to show that ff is a pseudo-isomorphism: now, if p=0p = 0 or if p∈Pp \in P is distinct from the pip_i, Tp=Tp′=0T_p = T'_p = 0 (Chapter II, § 4, no. 4, Proposition 17); if on the contrary pp is one of the pip_i (1≤i≤k1 \leq i \leq k), ss is invertible in ApA_p, and, as fpi=s(f0)pif_{p_i} = s(f_0)_{p_i} and (f0)pi(f_0)_{p_i} is an isomorphism of Tpi=(S−1T)miT_{p_i} = (S^{-1}T)_{m_i} onto Tpi′=(S−1T′)miT'_{p_i} = (S^{-1}T')_{m_i}, so is fpif_{p_i}.

Bourbaki puts the proof directly after the statement, so what is above is the statement and its proof together.

Cited by

Cites

Transcribed from the printed volume. Not translated.