Bourbaki

Proposition 6

Tag 0577, permanent. Cite it as [Bourbaki, Tag 0577].

Algebra, chapter I, § 2. Identity element; cancellable elements; invertible elements

The notation is that of Definition 7 and ε\varepsilon denotes the canonical homomorphism of EE into ESE_S. (i) Let aa and bb be in EE; in order that ε(a)=ε(b)\varepsilon(a) = \varepsilon(b), it is necessary and sufficient that there exist s∈S′s \in S' with sa=sbsa = sb. (ii) For ε\varepsilon to be injective it is necessary and sufficient that every element of SS be cancellable. (iii) For ε\varepsilon to be bijective it is necessary and sufficient that every element of SS be invertible.

Assertion (i) is clear and shows that ε\varepsilon is injective if and only if every element of S′S' is cancellable; but since the set of cancellable elements of EE is a submonoid of EE (no. 2, Proposition 2), it amounts to the same to say that every element of SS is cancellable.

† It is also called monoid of differences if the law on EE is written additively.

If ε\varepsilon is bijective every element of S is invertible, for ε(S)\varepsilon(S) is composed of invertible elements of ESE_S. Conversely, suppose every element of S is invertible; then every element of S′S' is invertible (no. 3, Corollary 2 to Proposition 4) and hence cancellable. Then ε\varepsilon is injective by (ii) and a/p=ε(a.p∗)a/p = \varepsilon(a.p^*) by (1), hence ε\varepsilon is surjective.

Bourbaki puts the proof directly after the statement, so what is above is the statement and its proof together.

Cited by

Cites

Transcribed from the printed edition, 1998, Springer. Not translated.