Bourbaki

Lemma

Tag 05E1, permanent. Cite it as [Bourbaki, Tag 05E1].

Algebra, chapter I, § 6. Extensions, solvable groups, nilpotent groups

Let n=prmn = p^r m, where m is an integer which is not a multiple of pp. Then

(npr)≢0(modp). \binom{n}{p^r} \not\equiv 0 \pmod{p}.

Let S be a group of order prp^r (for example Z/prZ\mathbf{Z}/p^r \mathbf{Z}) and T a set with m elements. Write X=S×TX = S \times T and let E be the set of subsets of X with prp^r elements. Then Card(X)=n\mathrm{Card}(X) = n, whence Card(E)=(npr)\mathrm{Card}(E) = \binom{n}{p^r} (Set Theory, III, § 5, no. 8, Corollary 1 to Proposition 11). Let S operate on X by s.(x,y)=(sx,y)(s,x∈S,y∈T)s.(x, y) = (sx, y) (s, x \in S, y \in T) and consider the canonical extension of this operation to E. In the notation of no. 5, Proposition 11, the set ESE^S is the set of orbits of X, that is the set of subsets Y⊂XY \subset X of the form S×{t},t∈TS \times \{ t \}, t \in T, whence Card(ES)=m\mathrm{Card}(E^S) = m. By no. 5, Proposition 11,

(npr)=Card(E)≡Card(ES)=m≢0(modp), \binom{n}{p^r} = \mathrm{Card}(E) \equiv \mathrm{Card}(E^S) = m \not\equiv 0 \pmod{p},
which proves the lemma.

We now prove the theorem. Let G be a finite group and n its order; we write n=prmn = p^r m, where m is not a multiple of pp. Let E be the set of subsets of G with prp^r elements. Then

Card(E)=(npr); \mathrm{Card}(E) = \binom{n}{p^r};
whence, by virtue of the lemma, Card(E)≢0(modp)\mathrm{Card}(E) \not\equiv 0 \pmod{p}. Consider the extension to E of the operation of G on itself by left translation. There exists X∈EX \in E whose orbit has non-zero cardinal mod. pp. If HXH_X denotes the stabilizer of X, then

(G:Hx)≢0(modp)(G:H_x) \not\equiv 0 \pmod{p}, which means that prp^r divides Card(Hx)\mathrm{Card}(H_x). But HxH_x consists of the s∈Gs \in G such that sX=XsX = X; if x∈Xx \in X, then Hx⊂X.x−1H_x \subset X.x^{-1}, whence Card(Hx)⩽Card(X)=pr\mathrm{Card}(H_x) \leqslant \mathrm{Card}(X) = p^r. Hence Card(Hx)=pr\mathrm{Card}(H_x) = p^r.

Bourbaki puts the proof directly after the statement, so what is above is the statement and its proof together.

Cited by

Nothing.

Cites

Transcribed from the printed edition, 1998, Springer. Not translated.