For every projective A-module E, the B-module ρ∗(E) is projective. If further ρ is injective, the canonical mapping of E into ρ∗(E) is injective.
By hypothesis there exists a free A-module M containing E and in which E admits a supplement F. It follows immediately from § 3, no. 7, Proposition 7 that M(B) is identified with the direct sum of E(B) and F(B) and if ϕ and ψ are the canonical mappings E→E(B) and F→F(B), the canonical mapping M→M(B) is just x+y↦ϕ(x)+ψ(y). The corollary follows immediately from Proposition 4 applied to the A-module M.
When E is a right A-module, we write similarly ρ∗(E)=E⊗Aρ∗(Bs), B being considered this time as an (A, B)-bimodule and the right B-module structure on ρ∗(E) being such that (x⊗β)β′=x⊗(ββ′) for β∈B′ β′∈B and x∈E. We leave to the reader the task of stating for right modules the results corresponding to those of this no. and the following.
Remark (4). Consider the left A-module ρ∗(Bs) defined by ρ and for every left A-module E, consider the Z-module
ρ~(E)=HomA(ρ∗(Bs),E). As
ρ∗(Bs) has a right B-module structure, a left B-module structure is derived on
ρ~(E) (§ 1, no. 14) such that, if
u∈ρ~(E) and
b′∈B,
b′u is the homomorphism
b↦u(bb′) of
ρ∗(Bs) into E. We further define an A-linear mapping, called canonical
η:ρ∗(ρ~(E))→E associating with every homomorphism
u∈ρ~(E) the element
u(1) in E. As B can be considered as an (A, B)-bimodule by means of
ρ, for every left B-module F, there is a canonical
Z-module isomorphism
HomA(ρ∗(Bs)⊗BF,E)→HomB(F,HomA(ρ∗(Bs),E)) (§ 1, no. 1, Proposition 1). As the left A-module
ρ∗(Bs)⊗BF is canonically identified with
ρ∗(F) by virtue of § 3, no. 4, Proposition 4, we obtain a canonical
Z-module isomorphism, the inverse of the above
HomB(F,ρ~(E))→HomA(ρ∗(F),E) which associates with every B-linear mapping g of F into
ρ~(E) the composite mapping
η∘g, considered as an A-linear mapping of
ρ∗(F) into E. In particular, under the hypotheses of Proposition 2, if F is replaced by
σ∗(Cs), we obtain a canonical C-isomorphism
σ~(ρ~(E))→(σ∘ρ)∗(E).
Bourbaki puts the proof directly after the statement, so what is above is the statement and its proof together.