Bourbaki

Corollary

Tag 05QJ, permanent. Cite it as [Bourbaki, Tag 05QJ].

Algebra, chapter II, § 5. Extension of the ring of scalars

For every projective A-module E, the B-module ρ∗(E)\rho^*(E) is projective. If further ρ\rho is injective, the canonical mapping of E into ρ∗(E)\rho^*(E) is injective.

By hypothesis there exists a free A-module M containing E and in which E admits a supplement F. It follows immediately from § 3, no. 7, Proposition 7 that M(B)M_{(B)} is identified with the direct sum of E(B)E_{(B)} and F(B)F_{(B)} and if ϕ\phi and ψ\psi are the canonical mappings E→E(B)E \to E_{(B)} and F→F(B)F \to F_{(B)}, the canonical mapping M→M(B)M \to M_{(B)} is just x+y↦ϕ(x)+ψ(y)x + y \mapsto \phi(x) + \psi(y). The corollary follows immediately from Proposition 4 applied to the A-module M.

When E is a right A-module, we write similarly ρ∗(E)=E⊗Aρ∗(Bs)\rho^*(E) = E \otimes_A \rho_*(B_s), B being considered this time as an (A, B)-bimodule and the right B-module structure on ρ∗(E)\rho^*(E) being such that (x⊗β)β′=x⊗(ββ′)(x \otimes \beta)\beta' = x \otimes (\beta\beta') for β∈B′ β′∈B\beta \in B' \ \beta' \in B and x∈Ex \in E. We leave to the reader the task of stating for right modules the results corresponding to those of this no. and the following.

Remark (4). Consider the left A-module ρ∗(Bs)\rho_*(B_s) defined by ρ\rho and for every left A-module E, consider the Z\mathbf{Z}-module

ρ~(E)=Hom⁡A(ρ∗(Bs),E). \tilde{\rho}(E) = \operatorname{Hom}_A(\rho_*(B_s), E).
As ρ∗(Bs)\rho_*(B_s) has a right B-module structure, a left B-module structure is derived on ρ~(E)\tilde{\rho}(E) (§ 1, no. 14) such that, if u∈ρ~(E)u \in \tilde{\rho}(E) and b′∈Bb' \in B, b′ub'u is the homomorphism b↦u(bb′)b \mapsto u(bb') of ρ∗(Bs)\rho_*(B_s) into E. We further define an A-linear mapping, called canonical
η:ρ∗(ρ~(E))→E \eta : \rho_*(\tilde{\rho}(E)) \to E
associating with every homomorphism u∈ρ~(E)u \in \tilde{\rho}(E) the element u(1)u(1) in E. As B can be considered as an (A, B)-bimodule by means of ρ\rho, for every left B-module F, there is a canonical Z\mathbf{Z}-module isomorphism
Hom⁡A(ρ∗(Bs)⊗BF,E)→Hom⁡B(F,Hom⁡A(ρ∗(Bs),E)) \operatorname{Hom}_A(\rho_*(B_s) \otimes_B F, E) \to \operatorname{Hom}_B(F, \operatorname{Hom}_A(\rho_*(B_s), E))
(§ 1, no. 1, Proposition 1). As the left A-module ρ∗(Bs)⊗BF\rho^*(B_s) \otimes_B F is canonically identified with ρ∗(F)\rho_*(F) by virtue of § 3, no. 4, Proposition 4, we obtain a canonical Z\mathbf{Z}-module isomorphism, the inverse of the above
Hom⁡B(F,ρ~(E))→Hom⁡A(ρ∗(F),E) \operatorname{Hom}_B(F, \tilde{\rho}(E)) \to \operatorname{Hom}_A(\rho_*(F), E)
which associates with every B-linear mapping g of F into ρ~(E)\tilde{\rho}(E) the composite mapping η∘g\eta \circ g, considered as an A-linear mapping of ρ∗(F)\rho_*(F) into E. In particular, under the hypotheses of Proposition 2, if F is replaced by σ∗(Cs)\sigma_*(C_s), we obtain a canonical C-isomorphism
σ~(ρ~(E))→(σ∘ρ)∗(E). \tilde{\sigma}(\tilde{\rho}(E)) \to (\sigma \circ \rho)^*(E).

Bourbaki puts the proof directly after the statement, so what is above is the statement and its proof together.

Cited by

Cites

Transcribed from the printed edition, 1998, Springer. Not translated.