Let N and P be two submodules of an A-module M such that their sum N+P is a direct factor in M and their intersection N∩P is a direct factor in N and in P. Then the homomorphisms T(N)→T(M), T(P)→T(M) and
T(N∩P)→T(M), canonical extensions of the canonical injections, are injective; if T(N), T(P) and T(N∩P) are identified with subalgebras of T(M) by means of these homomorphisms, then (5)
T(N∩P)=T(N)∩T(P).
By hypothesis, there exist submodules N′⊂N and P′⊂P such that N=N′⊕(N∩P), P=P′⊕(N∩P); then
N+P=N′⊕P′⊕(N∩P) and there exists by hypothesis a submodule
M′ of
M such that
M=M′⊕(N+P)=M′⊕N′⊕P′⊕(N∩P)=M′⊕P′⊕N=M′⊕N′⊕P.
In particular, N+P, N, P and N∩P are direct factors in M, which implies, as has been seen above, that the canonical homomorphisms
T(N+P)→T(M),T(N)→T(M), T(P)→T(M),T(N∩P)→T(M) are injective. The three algebras
T(N),
T(P) and
T(N∩P) are thus identified with subalgebras of
T(N+P) and the latter with a subalgebra of
T(M);
writing Q=N∩P, it remains to show that, if T(Q), T(N′⊕Q) and T(P′⊕Q) are identified with subalgebras of T(N′⊕P′⊕Q), then
T(N′⊕Q)∩T(P′⊕Q)=T(Q).
Now, consider the commutative diagram
N′⊕Q↓Q⟶⟶N′⊕P′⊕Q↓P′⊕Q
where the horizontal arrows are the canonical injections and the vertical arrows the canonical projections. We derive a commutative diagram
T(N′⊕Q)↓rT(Q)⟶u⟶vT(N′⊕P′⊕Q)↓sT(P′⊕Q)
where r and s are surjective homomorphisms (Proposition 3) and u and v injective homomorphisms. Hence, to prove (6), note that the right hand side is obviously contained in the left; it therefore suffices to verify that if
x∈T(N′⊕Q)∩T(P′⊕Q),
then x∈T(Q). Now the definition of the homomorphism s shows that its restriction to T(P′⊕Q) (identified with a subalgebra of T(N′⊕P′⊕Q)) is the identity mapping; the hypothesis on x therefore implies that s(u(x))=x. But then also v(r(x))=x, in other words x belongs to the image of T(Q) in T(P′⊕Q), which was to be proved.
Bourbaki puts the proof directly after the statement, so what is above is the statement and its proof together.