Bourbaki

Proposition 4

Tag 061M, permanent. Cite it as [Bourbaki, Tag 061M].

Algebra, chapter III, § 5. Tensor algebra. Tensors

Let NN and PP be two submodules of an AA-module MM such that their sum N+PN + P is a direct factor in MM and their intersection N∩PN \cap P is a direct factor in NN and in PP. Then the homomorphisms T(N)→T(M)T(N) \to T(M), T(P)→T(M)T(P) \to T(M) and

T(N∩P)→T(M), T(N \cap P) \to T(M),
canonical extensions of the canonical injections, are injective; if T(N)T(N), T(P)T(P) and T(N∩P)T(N \cap P) are identified with subalgebras of T(M)T(M) by means of these homomorphisms, then (5)
T(N∩P)=T(N)∩T(P). T(N \cap P) = T(N) \cap T(P).

By hypothesis, there exist submodules N′⊂NN' \subset N and P′⊂PP' \subset P such that N=N′⊕(N∩P)N = N' \oplus (N \cap P), P=P′⊕(N∩P)P = P' \oplus (N \cap P); then

N+P=N′⊕P′⊕(N∩P) N + P = N' \oplus P' \oplus (N \cap P)
and there exists by hypothesis a submodule M′M' of MM such that
M=M′⊕(N+P)=M′⊕N′⊕P′⊕(N∩P)=M′⊕P′⊕N=M′⊕N′⊕P. M = M' \oplus (N + P) = M' \oplus N' \oplus P' \oplus (N \cap P) \\ = M' \oplus P' \oplus N = M' \oplus N' \oplus P.

In particular, N+PN + P, NN, PP and N∩PN \cap P are direct factors in MM, which implies, as has been seen above, that the canonical homomorphisms

T(N+P)→T(M),T(N)→T(M), T(N + P) \to T(M), \quad T(N) \to T(M),
T(P)→T(M),T(N∩P)→T(M) T(P) \to T(M), \quad T(N \cap P) \to T(M)
are injective. The three algebras T(N)T(N), T(P)T(P) and T(N∩P)T(N \cap P) are thus identified with subalgebras of T(N+P)T(N + P) and the latter with a subalgebra of T(M)T(M);

writing Q=N∩PQ = N \cap P, it remains to show that, if T(Q)T(Q), T(N′⊕Q)T(N' \oplus Q) and T(P′⊕Q)T(P' \oplus Q) are identified with subalgebras of T(N′⊕P′⊕Q)T(N' \oplus P' \oplus Q), then

T(N′⊕Q)∩T(P′⊕Q)=T(Q). T(N' \oplus Q) \cap T(P' \oplus Q) = T(Q).

Now, consider the commutative diagram

N′⊕Q⟶N′⊕P′⊕Q↓↓Q⟶P′⊕Q \begin{array}{ccc} N' \oplus Q & \longrightarrow & N' \oplus P' \oplus Q \\ \downarrow & & \downarrow \\ Q & \longrightarrow & P' \oplus Q \end{array}

where the horizontal arrows are the canonical injections and the vertical arrows the canonical projections. We derive a commutative diagram

T(N′⊕Q)⟶uT(N′⊕P′⊕Q)↓r↓sT(Q)⟶vT(P′⊕Q) \begin{array}{ccc} T(N' \oplus Q) & \overset{u}{\longrightarrow} & T(N' \oplus P' \oplus Q) \\ \downarrow r & & \downarrow s \\ T(Q) & \overset{v}{\longrightarrow} & T(P' \oplus Q) \end{array}

where rr and ss are surjective homomorphisms (Proposition 3) and uu and vv injective homomorphisms. Hence, to prove (6), note that the right hand side is obviously contained in the left; it therefore suffices to verify that if

x∈T(N′⊕Q)∩T(P′⊕Q), x \in T(N' \oplus Q) \cap T(P' \oplus Q),

then x∈T(Q)x \in T(Q). Now the definition of the homomorphism ss shows that its restriction to T(P′⊕Q)T(P' \oplus Q) (identified with a subalgebra of T(N′⊕P′⊕Q)T(N' \oplus P' \oplus Q)) is the identity mapping; the hypothesis on xx therefore implies that s(u(x))=xs(u(x)) = x. But then also v(r(x))=xv(r(x)) = x, in other words xx belongs to the image of T(Q)T(Q) in T(P′⊕Q)T(P' \oplus Q), which was to be proved.

Bourbaki puts the proof directly after the statement, so what is above is the statement and its proof together.

Cited by

Cites

Transcribed from the printed edition, 1998, Springer. Not translated.