Bourbaki

Proposition 10

Tag 062M, permanent. Cite it as [Bourbaki, Tag 062M].

Algebra, chapter III, § 6. Symmetric algebras

Let Δ\Delta be a commutative monoid, MM a graded AA-module of type Δ\Delta and (Mα)α∈Δ(M_\alpha)_{\alpha \in \Delta} its graduation. For every ordered pair (α,n)∈Δ×N(\alpha, n) \in \Delta \times \mathbf{N}, let Sα,n(M)S^{\alpha, n}(M) be the submodule of Sn(M)S^n(M) the direct sum of the submodules ⨂λ∈JSnλ(Mαλ)\bigotimes_{\lambda \in J} S^{n_\lambda}(M_{\alpha_\lambda}), where (nλ)λ∈L(n_\lambda)_{\lambda \in L} runs through the set of families of integers ≥0\geq 0 such that ∑λ∈Lnλ=n\sum_{\lambda \in L} n_\lambda = n, JJ is its support and, for each (nλ),(αλ)λ∈J(n_\lambda), (\alpha_\lambda)_{\lambda \in J} runs through the set of families of ΔJ\Delta^J such that ∑λ∈Jαλ=α\sum_{\lambda \in J} \alpha_\lambda = \alpha. Then (Sα,n(M))(α,n)∈Δ×N(S^{\alpha, n}(M))_{(\alpha, n) \in \Delta \times \mathbf{N}} is the only graduation of type Δ×N\Delta \times \mathbf{N} compatible with the algebra structure on S(M)S(M) and which induces on M=S1(M)M = S^1(M) the given graduation.

The fact that S(M)S(M) is the direct sum of the Sα,n(M)S^{\alpha, n}(M) follows from the Corollary to Proposition 9; the rest of the proof is identical with the end of the proof of § 5, no. 5, Proposition 7.

Suppose more particularly that Δ=Z\Delta = \mathbf{Z} and let S(M)S(M) be given the total graduation (of type Z\mathbf{Z}) (II, § 11, no. 1) corresponding to the graduation of type Z×N\mathbf{Z} \times \mathbf{N} (and hence also of type Z×Z\mathbf{Z} \times \mathbf{Z}) defined above; the homogeneous elements of degree n∈Zn \in \mathbf{Z} under this graduation are therefore those of the direct sum of the Sq,m(M)S^{q, m}(M) for q+m=nq + m = n. Let ff be a homogeneous linear mapping of degree 0 of the graded AA-module MM into a commutative graded AA-algebra FF of type Z\mathbf{Z}; then the algebra homomorphism g:S(M)→Fg : S(M) \to F such that f=g∘ϕM′f = g \circ \phi_M' is a homomorphism of graded algebras of type Z\mathbf{Z}, as follows from the formula g(x1x2…xn)=f(x1)f(x2)…f(xn)g(x_1 x_2 \ldots x_n) = f(x_1) f(x_2) \ldots f(x_n) for homogeneous xix_i in MM, from the hypothesis on ff and from the definition of the graduation of type Z\mathbf{Z} on S(M)S(M).

Bourbaki puts the proof directly after the statement, so what is above is the statement and its proof together.

Cited by

Nothing.

Cites

Transcribed from the printed edition, 1998, Springer. Not translated.