Bourbaki

Theorem 2

Tag 063M, permanent. Cite it as [Bourbaki, Tag 063M].

Algebra, chapter III, § 7. Exterior algebras

*Let MM be an AA-module with a finite basis (ei)1≤i≤n(e_i)_{1 \leq i \leq n}. For a sequence (xi)1≤i≤n(x_i)_{1 \leq i \leq n} of nn elements of MM to form a basis of MM, it is necessary and sufficient that the element λ∈A\lambda \in A such that

x1∧x2∧…∧xn=λ⋅e1∧e2∧⋯∧en x_1 \wedge x_2 \wedge \ldots \wedge x_n = \lambda \cdot e_1 \wedge e_2 \wedge \cdots \wedge e_n

be invertible in AA.*

Recall that e1∧e2∧⋯∧ene_1 \wedge e_2 \wedge \cdots \wedge e_n is the unique element of a basis of Λn(M)\Lambda^n(M) (no. 8, Corollary 1 to Theorem 1) so that the element λ∈A\lambda \in A satisfying (23) is determined uniquely. If (xi)1≤i≤n(x_i)_{1 \leq i \leq n} is a basis of MM, x1∧x2∧⋯∧xnx_1 \wedge x_2 \wedge \cdots \wedge x_n is the unique element in a basis of Λn(M)\Lambda^n(M) (no. 8), then λ\lambda is invertible. Conversely, suppose λ\lambda is invertible; then the alternating nn-linear form ff corresponding to the linear mapping g:Λn(M)→Ag: \Lambda^n(M) \to A such that

g(e1∧e2∧⋯∧en)=λ−1 g(e_1 \wedge e_2 \wedge \cdots \wedge e_n) = \lambda^{-1}

is such that f(x1,x2,…,xn)=1f(x_1, x_2, \ldots, x_n) = 1. For all x∈Mx \in M, obviously

x∧x1∧⋯∧xn=0 x \wedge x_1 \wedge \cdots \wedge x_n = 0

(no. 3, Proposition 6); applying no. 8, Corollary 3 to Theorem 1, we obtain

f(x1,x2,…,xn)⋅x=∑i=1n(−1)i−1f(x,x1,…,x^i,…,xn)⋅xi. f(x_1, x_2, \ldots, x_n) \cdot x = \sum_{i=1}^n (-1)^{i-1} f(x, x_1, \ldots, \hat{x}_i, \ldots, x_n) \cdot x_i.

As f(x1,…,xn)=1f(x_1, \ldots, x_n) = 1, this shows that every x∈Mx \in M is a linear combination of x1,x2,…,xnx_1, x_2, \ldots, x_n and, as the latter are linearly independent (since

x1∧x2∧⋯∧xn≠0), x_1 \wedge x_2 \wedge \cdots \wedge x_n \neq 0),

they form a basis of MM.

Bourbaki puts the proof directly after the statement, so what is above is the statement and its proof together.

Cited by

Cites

Transcribed from the printed edition, 1998, Springer. Not translated.