Bourbaki

Example 3

Tag 06FE, permanent. Cite it as [Bourbaki, Tag 06FE].

Algebra, chapter IV, § 6. Symmetric functions

Let us prove the formula

res⁡2,2(aX2+bX+c,a′X2+b′X+c′)=(ac′−ca′)2+(bc′−cb′)(ba′−ab′) \operatorname{res}_{2,2}(aX^2 + bX + c, a'X^2 + b'X + c') = (ac' - ca')^2 + (bc' - cb')(ba' - ab')

Arguing as for Prop. 9 (IV, p. 79) we see that it is enough to prove the formula when aa is invertible. There exists then a decomposition of the form

aX2+bX+c=a(X−x)(X−y) aX^2 + bX + c = a(X - x)(X - y)

in B[X]B[X], where BB is an appropriate ring containing AA as subring. By Cor. 1 above, the required resultant is equal to

R=a2(a′x2+b′x+c′)(a′y2+b′y+c′). R = a^2(a'x^2 + b'x + c')(a'y^2 + b'y + c') .

Now we have

ax+ay=−b,axy=c ax + ay = -b , \quad axy = c

by (43), whence (ax)2+(ay)2=b2−2ac(ax)^2 + (ay)^2 = b^2 - 2ac.

By (44) we have

R=a′2(axy)2+ab′2(axy)+a2c′2+a′b′(axy)(ax+ay)+ R = {a'}^2(axy)^2 + a{b'}^2(axy) + a^2{c'}^2 + a'b'(axy)(ax + ay) +
+a′c′((ax)2+(ay)2)+ab′c′(ax+ay) + a'c'((ax)^2 + (ay)^2) + ab'c'(ax + ay)
=a′2c2+ab′2c+a2c′2−a′b′cb+a′c′(b2−2ac)−ab′c′b = {a'}^2c^2 + a{b'}^2c + a^2{c'}^2 - a'b'cb + a'c'(b^2 - 2ac) - ab'c'b
=(ac′−ca′)2+(ab′−a′b)(b′c−c′b), = (ac' - ca')^2 + (ab' - a'b)(b'c - c'b) ,

from which the desired result follows.

Bourbaki puts the proof directly after the statement, so what is above is the statement and its proof together.

Cited by

Nothing.

Cites

Transcribed from the printed edition, 2003, Springer. Not translated.