Example 3
Tag 06FE, permanent. Cite it as [Bourbaki, Tag 06FE].
Algebra, chapter IV, § 6. Symmetric functions
Let us prove the formula
res2,2(aX2+bX+c,a′X2+b′X+c′)=(ac′−ca′)2+(bc′−cb′)(ba′−ab′)
Arguing as for Prop. 9 (IV, p. 79) we see that it is enough to prove the formula when a is invertible. There exists then a decomposition of the form
aX2+bX+c=a(X−x)(X−y)
in B[X], where B is an appropriate ring containing A as subring. By Cor. 1 above, the required resultant is equal to
R=a2(a′x2+b′x+c′)(a′y2+b′y+c′).
Now we have
ax+ay=−b,axy=c
by (43), whence (ax)2+(ay)2=b2−2ac.
By (44) we have
R=a′2(axy)2+ab′2(axy)+a2c′2+a′b′(axy)(ax+ay)+
+a′c′((ax)2+(ay)2)+ab′c′(ax+ay)
=a′2c2+ab′2c+a2c′2−a′b′cb+a′c′(b2−2ac)−ab′c′b
=(ac′−ca′)2+(ab′−a′b)(b′c−c′b),
from which the desired result follows.
Bourbaki puts the proof directly after the statement, so what is above is the statement and its proof together.
Cited by
Nothing.
Cites