Bourbaki

Definition 1

Tag 06GV, permanent. Cite it as [Bourbaki, Tag 06GV].

Algebra, chapter V, § 2. Extensions

— Let K be a field. By an extension of K we understand a K-algebra whose underlying ring is a field. By a subextension (or sub-K-extension) of the extension E we understand a sub-K-algebra of E which is a field. Let E be an extension of K. The mapping u : A ↦ λ . 1 of K into E is a ring homomorphism; by I, p. 115, u induces an isomorphism of K onto a subfield u(K) of E. Conversely, if K, E are fields and u is a homomorphism of K into E, then u defines on E a structure of extension of K (III, p. 433). By abuse of language one sometimes says that (E, u) is an extension of K. An extension is said to be trivial if u(K) = E, that is, if E is a vector space of dimension 1 over K. Let L be an extension field of K. When we consider L as extension of K, we understand by this the extension (L, j) of K, where j is the canonical injection of K into L, or also L with the corresponding K-algebra structure. The subextensions of L are then the intermediate fields between K and L, that is, the subfields of L containing K. If L' is another extension field of K, a K-homomorphism of L into L' is then a homomorphism f of L into L' such that f(x) = x for all x ∈ K. We note that if f is any endomorphism of the field L, then the set of elements of L invariant under f is a subfield K' of L, and that f is then a K'-endomorphism of L. In particular let P be the prime subfield of a field L. We can consider L as an extension of P, and every endomorphism of L is then a P-endomorphism. Let (E, u) be an extension of K; since u defines an isomorphism of K onto a subfield K_1 of E, there is in general no difficulty in identifying K with K_1 by means of u. One case where we cannot allow such an identification is that where K = E and where u is thus an endomorphism of K; most frequently u will be an automorphism of K, or the mapping u ↦ u'', when the field K is of characteristic ≠ 0. It is clear that every extension of K is isomorphic to an extension (L, j), where L is a field containing K as subfield and j is the canonical injection of K into L.

Bourbaki puts the proof directly after the statement, so what is above is the statement and its proof together.

Cited by

Nothing.

Cites

Transcribed from the printed edition, 2003, Springer. Not translated.