Bourbaki

Lemma 1

Tag 06JL, permanent. Cite it as [Bourbaki, Tag 06JL].

Algebra, chapter V, § 6. Etale algebras

— Let Ω\Omega be an algebraic closure of KK; then we have h(L)≤h(Ω)h(L) \leq h(\Omega) for every extension LL of KK, with equality when LL is algebraically closed.

Let L′L' be the algebraic closure of KK in LL. For every homomorphism uu of AA into LL we have [u(A):K]≤n[u(A) : K] \leq n, hence u(A)⊂L′u(A) \subset L' by V, p. 18, Prop. 2; we thus have h(L′)=h(L)h(L') = h(L). Since the extension L′L' of KK is isomorphic to a subextension of Ω\Omega (V, p. 20, Th. 1), we have h(L′)≤h(Ω)h(L') \leq h(\Omega). If LL is algebraically closed, then L′L' is an algebraic closure of KK; the extensions L′L' and Ω\Omega of KK are then isomorphic (V, p. 23, Th. 2) and so h(L′)=h(Ω)h(L') = h(\Omega); the Lemma follows directly from this.

By Lemma 1, the number h(L)h(L) has the same value for all algebraically closed extensions LL of KK; this number will be denoted by [A:K][A : K], and called the separable degree of AA.

Let AA and BB be two commutative algebras of finite degree over KK. We shall establish the formula

[A⊗KB:K]s=[A:K]s⋅[B:K]s. [A \otimes_K B : K]_s = [A : K]_s \cdot [B : K]_s .

Let LL be an algebraically closed extension of KK and denote by H(A)\mathscr{H}(A) the set of algebra homomorphisms of AA into LL, and similarly define H(B)\mathscr{H}(B) and H(A⊗KB)\mathscr{H}(A \otimes_K B). By definition we have Card H(A)=[A:K]\mathscr{H}(A) = [A : K], and corresponding formulae for [B : K], and [A \otimes_K B : K]. Moreover (III, p. 465, Formula (6)), the formula (u∗v)(a⊗b)=u(a)v(b)(u * v)(a \otimes b) = u(a)v(b) defines a bijection (u,v)↦u∗v(u, v) \mapsto u * v of H(A)×H(B)\mathscr{H}(A) \times \mathscr{H}(B) onto H(A⊗KB)\mathscr{H}(A \otimes_K B), whence Formula (7) follows.

Let K′K' be an extension of KK; we shall prove the formula

[A(K′):K′],=[A:K],. [A_{(K')}: K'], = [A: K], .
For take LL to be an algebraic closure of K′K'. The formula u~(x)=u(1⊗x)\tilde{u}(x) = u(1 \otimes x) (for x∈Ax \in A) defines a bijection u↦u~u \mapsto \tilde{u} between the set of K′K'-homomorphisms of A(K′)A_{(K')} into LL and the set of KK-homomorphisms of AA into LL, whence (8).

Finally, suppose that K′K' is an extension of finite degree of KK; if A′A' is a commutative K′K'-algebra of finite degree, then it is also a commutative KK-algebra of finite degree and we have [A′:K]=[A′:K′]⋅[K′:K][A': K] = [A': K'] \cdot [K': K] (V. p. 10, Th. 1). We shall prove the formula

[A′:K],=[A′:K′]s⋅[K′:K],. [A': K], = [A': K']_s \cdot [K': K], .
For let SS (resp. TT) be the set of KK-homomorphisms of K′K' (resp. A′A') into an algebraic closure LL of KK; for every σ∈S\sigma \in S we denote by TσT_\sigma the set of elements ff of TT such that f(a⋅1)=σ(a)f(a \cdot 1) = \sigma(a) for all a∈K′a \in K'. Then the family (Tσ)σ(T_\sigma)_\sigma is a partition of TT and we have Card S=[K′:K]S = [K': K]; now for each σ∈S\sigma \in S the set TσT_\sigma consists of K′K'-homomorphisms of A′A' into the algebraically closed extension (L,σ)(L, \sigma) of K′K', hence Card Tσ=[A′:K′]sT_\sigma = [A': K']_s, and so we have proved (9).

Bourbaki puts the proof directly after the statement, so what is above is the statement and its proof together.

Cited by

Nothing.

Cites

Transcribed from the printed edition, 2003, Springer. Not translated.