Bourbaki

Lemma 4

Tag 06JS, permanent. Cite it as [Bourbaki, Tag 06JS].

Algebra, V, p. 33, § 6. Etale algebras

Let AA be a commutative ring and let aa be a finitely generated ideal of AA such that a=a2a = a^2. Then there exists an idempotent ee in AA such that a=Aea = Ae.

Let (a1,...,ar)(a_1, ..., a_r) be a generating system of the ideal aa; since a=a2a = a^2, there exist elements xijx_{ij} in aa such that ai=∑j=1rxijaja_i = \sum_{j=1}^r x_{ij} a_j for 1≤i≤r1 \leq i \leq r. Write MM for the square matrix of order rr whose elements are δij−xij\delta_{ij} - x_{ij} and let DD be its determinant. There exists (III, p. 532, Formula (26)) a square matrix NN of order rr with elements in AA such that N⋅M=D⋅IN \cdot M = D \cdot I, whence immediately Daj=0Da_j = 0 for 1≤j≤r1 \leq j \leq r and so finally Da=0Da = 0. Now the matrix MM is congruent to II, mod aa, hence D≡ID \equiv I mod aa. Put e=1−De = 1 - D; then e∈ae \in a and ex=xex = x for all x∈ax \in a. It follows that ee is an idempotent and aa is equal to AeAe.

With these lemmas established, let us show by induction on the degree of AA that AA is diagonalizable if KK is algebraically closed and ΩK(A)=0\Omega_K(A) = 0. Let mm be a maximal ideal of AA (I, p. 104). By Lemmas 3 and 4, there exists an idempotent ee such that m=Aem = Ae; we have seen that A/mA/m is of degree 1 over KK. Hence AA is a direct sum of the ideals a=(1−e)Aa = (1 - e)A and mm and we have [a:K]=1[a : K] = 1, hence AA is isomorphic to K×A/aK \times A/a. Since ΩK(A/a)\Omega_K(A/a) is isomorphic to a quotient of ΩK(A)\Omega_K(A) (III, p. 573, Prop. 22), it is zero and the induction hypothesis shows that A/aA/a is diagonalizable. This then shows AA to be diagonalizable.

Bourbaki puts the proof directly after the statement, so what is above is the statement and its proof together.

Cited by

Cites

Transcribed from the printed edition, 2003, Springer. Not translated.