Lemma 5
Tag 06JW, permanent. Cite it as [Bourbaki, Tag 06JW].
Algebra, V, p. 35, § 6. Etale algebras
Let B be a reduced algebra of finite degree over a perfect field P; then B is etale.
By Prop. 5 there exist extensions of such that is isomorphic to the algebra . Since a finite product of etale algebras is etale (V, p. 31, Cor.) it is enough to examine the case where is an extension of . By Th. 3 (V, p. 33) it is enough to show that in for all .
Let ; since is of finite degree over , is algebraic over (V, p. 18, Prop. 2). Let be the minimal polynomial of and let be the derivative off. The polynomial is non-constant. Suppose that ; by V, p. 9, Cor. the field is of characteristic and we have ; since is perfect, we have , but the irreducible polynomial cannot lie in .
We thus have and since the degree of is strictly less than that off, we have . Now from we deduce in , whence , as we had to show.
*B) Suppose that is etale; by the equivalence of a) and b) the algebra is reduced, so there exist extensions of such that is isomorphic to (Prop. 5). Since is etale, each of the extensions is an etale algebra (V, p. 31, Cor.), and hence by definition is a separable algebraic extension of .
The implication follows from V, p. 31, Cor. \*
Bourbaki puts the proof directly after the statement, so what is above is the statement and its proof together.
Cited by
Nothing.