Bourbaki

Proposition 3

Tag 06K4, permanent. Cite it as [Bourbaki, Tag 06K4].

Algebra, chapter V, § 7. Separable algebraic extensions

— Let f be a non-zero polynomial in K[X] and let Ω be an algebraically closed extension of K. The following conditions are equivalent: a) The polynomial f is relatively prime to its derivative f' in K[X]. b) Either deg(f) = 0, or deg(f) > 0 and dis(f) ≠ 0 (IV, p. 83). c) There exists an extension L of K such that f splits in L[X] into a product of distinct polynomials of degree ≤ 1. d) The roots off in Ω are simple. e) The K-algebra K[X]/(f) is etale (V, p. 28, Def. 1).

a) ⇒ d): Under the hypothesis a) there exist two polynomials g and h in K[X] such that fg + f'h = 1 (IV, p. 12). Let a be a root of fin Ω; we have

f′(a) h(a)=f(a) g(a)+f′(a) h(a)=1, f'(a)\ h(a) = f(a)\ g(a) + f'(a)\ h(a) = 1,
whence f′(a)≠0f'(a) \neq 0; therefore aa is a simple root of fin Ω (IV, p. 17, Prop. 7).

d) ⇒ c): If d) holds, f splits in Ω[X] into a product of distinct factors of degree ≤ 1.

c) ⇒ b): Under the hypothesis c) there exist an element A≠0A \neq 0 in L and distinct elements a1,...,ana_1, ..., a_n of L such that f(X)=λ(X−a1)...(X−an)f(X) = \lambda (X - a_1) ... (X - a_n). If deg⁡(f)>0\deg(f) > 0, we have (IV, p. 83, Prop. 11),

dis⁡(f)=λ2n−2∏i<j(αi−αj)2≠0. \operatorname{dis}(f) = \lambda^{2n-2} \prod_{i < j} (\alpha_i - \alpha_j)^2 \neq 0.

b) ⇒ a): Let c be the leading coefficient and D the discriminant of f; the resultant of f′f' and f is equal to ± cD (IV, p. 84, Formula (54)), hence is non-zero; therefore (IV, p. 78, Cor. 2) the polynomials f and f′f' are relatively prime in K[X].

a) ⇒ e): Let A be the K-algebra K[X]/(f) and x the image of X in A; by III, p. 573, Prop. 22, the A-module ΩK(A)\Omega_K(A) is generated by the elements dxdx, subject to the single relation f′(x) dx=0f'(x)\ dx = 0. By V, p. 33, Th. 3, the K-algebra A is thus etale if and only if f′(x)f'(x) is an invertible element in A, which means that f and f′f' are relatively prime in K[X].

Bourbaki puts the proof directly after the statement, so what is above is the statement and its proof together.

Cited by

Cites

Transcribed from the printed edition, 2003, Springer. Not translated.