Proposition 3
Tag 06K4, permanent. Cite it as [Bourbaki, Tag 06K4].
Algebra, chapter V, § 7. Separable algebraic extensions
— Let f be a non-zero polynomial in K[X] and let Ω be an algebraically closed extension of K. The following conditions are equivalent: a) The polynomial f is relatively prime to its derivative f' in K[X]. b) Either deg(f) = 0, or deg(f) > 0 and dis(f) ≠ 0 (IV, p. 83). c) There exists an extension L of K such that f splits in L[X] into a product of distinct polynomials of degree ≤ 1. d) The roots off in Ω are simple. e) The K-algebra K[X]/(f) is etale (V, p. 28, Def. 1).
a) ⇒ d): Under the hypothesis a) there exist two polynomials g and h in K[X] such that fg + f'h = 1 (IV, p. 12). Let a be a root of fin Ω; we have
d) ⇒ c): If d) holds, f splits in Ω[X] into a product of distinct factors of degree ≤ 1.
c) ⇒ b): Under the hypothesis c) there exist an element in L and distinct elements of L such that . If , we have (IV, p. 83, Prop. 11),
b) ⇒ a): Let c be the leading coefficient and D the discriminant of f; the resultant of and f is equal to ± cD (IV, p. 84, Formula (54)), hence is non-zero; therefore (IV, p. 78, Cor. 2) the polynomials f and are relatively prime in K[X].
a) ⇒ e): Let A be the K-algebra K[X]/(f) and x the image of X in A; by III, p. 573, Prop. 22, the A-module is generated by the elements , subject to the single relation . By V, p. 33, Th. 3, the K-algebra A is thus etale if and only if is an invertible element in A, which means that f and are relatively prime in K[X].
Bourbaki puts the proof directly after the statement, so what is above is the statement and its proof together.