Let Ω be an extension of K and E, F two subextensions of Ω, of finite degree over K.
a) If E⊂F, then [F:K]s=[F:E]s⋅[E:K]s, and [F:K]i=[F:E]i⋅[E:K]i.
b) Let K′ be a subextension of Ω; then we have
[K′(E):K′]s≤[E:K]sand[K′(E):K′]i≤[E:K]i, and equality holds if K′ is linearly disjoint from E over K.
c) We have [K(E∪F):K]s≤[E:K]s⋅[F:K]s, and [K(E∪F):K]i≤[E:K]i⋅[F:K]i, and equality holds if E and F are linearly disjoint over K.
The assertion about the separable degrees in a) follows from (9) (V, p. 32). Since [F:K]=[F:E]⋅[E:K], the assertion about the inseparable degrees follows from this and (1).
By Cor. 1 of Prop. 13 (V, p. 44) and Prop. 15, we have
(2)
[K′(E):K′]s=[K′(Es):K′],[K′(E):K′]i=[F′(E):K′(Es)];
when K' is linearly disjoint from E over K, then E, is linearly disjoint from K' over K and E is linearly disjoint from K'(E_s) over E_s (V, p. 15, Prop. 8). Assertion b) now follows from Prop. 5 (V, p. 14).
By a) we have
[K(E∪F):K]=[F(E):F].[F:K]s; by b) we have
[F(E):F],≤[E:K], with equality if E and F are linearly disjoint over K. Hence we obtain the inequality
[K(E∪F):K],≤[E:K],.[F:K], with equality if E and F are linearly disjoint over K. The assertion of c) about the inseparable degrees is proved in a similar fashion.
Bourbaki puts the proof directly after the statement, so what is above is the statement and its proof together.
Nothing.