Bourbaki

Corollary

Tag 06OE, permanent. Cite it as [Bourbaki, Tag 06OE].

Algebra, chapter V, § 11. Abelian extensions

— Let E be an extension of K and let (Ei)i∈I(E_i)_{i \in I} be a family of subextensions of E such that E=K(⋃i∈IEi)E = K \left( \bigcup_{i \in I} E_i \right). Suppose that each extension EiE_i is abelian, then the same is true of E.

In the first place E is a Galois extension of K (V, p. 57, Prop. 1). If the field F is defined as in Prop. 1, then we have Ei⊂FE_i \subset F for all i∈Ii \in I, whence E=FE = F.

An extension E of K is said to be an abelian closure of K if it is an abelian extension of K and every abelian extension of K is isomorphic to a subextension of E. Prop. 1 implies the existence of an abelian closure of K: for let KsK_s be a separable closure of K, with Galois group Γ\Gamma and let (Γ‾,Γ‾)(\overline{\Gamma}, \overline{\Gamma}) be the closure of the derived group of Γ\Gamma; denote by KabK_{ab} the field of invariants of (Γ‾,Γ‾)(\overline{\Gamma}, \overline{\Gamma}); since every separable algebraic extension of K is isomorphic to a subextension of KsK_s (V, p. 45, Cor.). Prop. 1 shows that KabK_{ab} is an abelian closure of K. The Galois group of KabK_{ab} over K is canonically isomorphic to Γ/(Γ‾,Γ‾)\Gamma / (\overline{\Gamma}, \overline{\Gamma}). Let us now show the uniqueness of abelian closures: let E, E' be two abelian closures of K; by definition there exist K-homomorphisms u:E→E′u : E \to E' and v:E′→Ev : E' \to E and Prop. 1 (V, p. 52) implies that v(u(E))=Ev(u(E)) = E and u(v(E′))=E′u(v(E')) = E', hence uu is a K-isomorphism of E onto E'. Any other K-isomorphism of E onto E' is of the form u1=σ0∘uu_1 = \sigma_0 \circ u with σ0∈Gal(E′/K)\sigma_0 \in \mathrm{Gal}(E'/K); since Gal(E′/K)\mathrm{Gal}(E'/K) is commutative, the isomorphism σ↦u∘σ∘u−1\sigma \mapsto u \circ \sigma \circ u^{-1} of Gal(E/K)\mathrm{Gal}(E/K) onto Gal(E′/K)\mathrm{Gal}(E'/K) is independent of uu; it is called the canonical isomorphism of Gal(E/K)\mathrm{Gal}(E/K) onto Gal(E′/K)\mathrm{Gal}(E'/K).

Bourbaki puts the proof directly after the statement, so what is above is the statement and its proof together.

Cited by

Nothing.

Cites

Transcribed from the printed edition, 2003, Springer. Not translated.