Bourbaki

Proposition 3

Tag 06R2, permanent. Cite it as [Bourbaki, Tag 06R2].

Algebra, chapter V, § 13. p-radical extensions of height _ 1

— Let K be a field, L a p-radical extension of height ≤1\leq 1 of K and S, T two subsets of L. The following conditions are equivalent: a) The subset S is p-free over K and T is p-free over K(S). b) S∩T=∅S \cap T = \varnothing and S U T is p-free over K. If T is p-free over K(S), we have T∩K(S)=∅T \cap K(S) = \varnothing and a fortiori S∩T=∅S \cap T = \varnothing. We may therefore assume S and T disjoint. Let A be the subset of N(S∪T)N^{(S \cup T)} consisting of all families a=(ax)x∈S∪Ta = (a_x)_{x \in S \cup T} with ax<pa_x < p for all x∈S∪Tx \in S \cup T, and define subsets A′A' of N(S)N^{(S)} and A′′A'' of N(T)N^{(T)} in similar fashion. We can in a natural way, identify N(S∪T)N^{(S \cup T)} with N(S)×N(T)N^{(S)} \times N^{(T)}, and then A is identified with A′×A′′A' \times A''. For a∈Aa \in A put ua=∏x∈S∪Txαxu_a = \prod_{x \in S \cup T} x^{\alpha_x}, and similarly define uβ′u'_\beta and uγ′′u''_\gamma for β∈A′\beta \in A' and γ∈A′′\gamma \in A''. We have ua=uβ′uγ′′u_a = u'_\beta u''_\gamma for a=(β,γ)a = (\beta, \gamma) in A=A′×A′′A = A' \times A''. Moreover (uβ′)β∈A′(u'_\beta)_{\beta \in A'} generates the vector K-space K(S) (V, p. 94, Prop. 1). For S U T to be p-free over K it is necessary and sufficient that the family (uβ′uγ′′)β∈A′,γ∈A′′(u'_\beta u''_\gamma)_{\beta \in A', \gamma \in A''} should be free over K (V, p. 98, Prop. 1); it comes to the same (II, p. 222) to suppose that the family (uβ′)β∈A′(u'_\beta)_{\beta \in A'} is free over K and the family (uγ′′)γ∈A′′(u''_\gamma)_{\gamma \in A''} free over K(S). Now the equivalence of a) and b) follows from Prop. 1 (V, p. 98).

Bourbaki puts the proof directly after the statement, so what is above is the statement and its proof together.

Cited by

Nothing.

Cites

Transcribed from the printed edition, 2003, Springer. Not translated.