Bourbaki

Proposition 5

Tag 06R5, permanent. Cite it as [Bourbaki, Tag 06R5].

Algebra, V, p. 101, § 13. p-radical extensions of height _ 1

*Let KK be a field and LL an extension of KK generated by an element xx such that x∉K, xp∈Kx \notin K,\ x^p \in K. Let VV be a vector space over LL and AA a derivation of KK into VV such that Δ(xp)=0\Delta(x^p) = 0. Then there exists a unique derivation DD of LL into VV extending AA and such that D(x)=0D(x) = 0.

By VV, p. 24, Prop. 1, {1, x, …, xp−1}\{1,\ x,\ \ldots,\ x^{p-1}\} is a basis of LL over KK. For every element u=a0+a1x+…+ap−1xp−1u = a_0 + a_1x + \ldots + a_{p-1}x^{p-1} of LL (with a0, …, ap−1a_0,\ \ldots,\ a_{p-1} in KK) we put D(u)=A(a0)+xΔ(a1)+…+xp−1Δ(ap−1)D(u) = A(a_0) + x\Delta(a_1) + \ldots + x^{p-1}\Delta(a_{p-1}). It is clear that DD extends AA and satisfies (1); so it is enough to establish the relation

D(uv)=u⋅D(v)+v⋅D(u) D(uv) = u \cdot D(v) + v \cdot D(u)

when uu is of the form axiax^i and vv of the form bxjbx^j with a, ba,\ b in K, 0≤i<pK,\ 0 \leq i < p and 0≤j<p0 \leq j < p.

When i+j<pi + j < p we have uv=xi+jabuv = x^{i+j}ab, whence D(uv)=xi+jΔ(ab)D(uv) = x^{i+j}\Delta(ab). Otherwise we have 0≤i+j−p<p0 \leq i + j - p < p and so uv=xi+j−p(abxp)uv = x^{i+j-p}(abx^p), with abxp∈Kabx^p \in K, but since A(xp)=0A(x^p) = 0, we have A(abxp)=xpA(ab)A(abx^p) = x^pA(ab), whence again D(uv)=xi+jΔ(ab)D(uv) = x^{i+j}\Delta(ab). So we have in all cases

D(uv)=xi+jΔ(ab)=xixj(a⋅A(b)+b⋅Δ(a))=(axi)xj⋅Δ(b)+(bxj)xi⋅Δ(a)=u⋅D(v)+v⋅D(u). \begin{align*} D(uv) &= x^{i+j}\Delta(ab) = x^i x^j (a \cdot A(b) + b \cdot \Delta(a)) \\ &= (ax^i)x^j \cdot \Delta(b) + (bx^j)x^i \cdot \Delta(a) = u \cdot D(v) + v \cdot D(u) . \end{align*}

Bourbaki puts the proof directly after the statement, so what is above is the statement and its proof together.

Cited by

Cites

Nothing.

Transcribed from the printed edition, 2003, Springer. Not translated.