Let h∈L be of dimension s over E. Then I(h) belongs to C and we have [E:I(h)]=ps.
It is clear that I(h) is a subfield of E containing Ep. For each x∈E let fx be the E-linear form D↦D(x) on I). Since the intersection of the kcrncls of these linear forms is equal to 0, they generate the vector space dual to h (II, p. 301, Th. 7); hence there exist x1,…,xs in E such that the linear forms fx1,…,fxs form a basis of this dual. Let (Δ1,…,Δs) be the basis of h characterized by Δi(xj)=fxj(Δi)=δij. Put Di=xiΔi, then (D1,…,Ds) is a basis of I) over E and we have Di(xj)=xiδij. The derivations Dip−Di and [Di,Dj] for i,j=1,…,s belong to I) and annihilate x1,…,xs; we thus have
Dip=Di,[Di,Dj]=0 For i in the range 0 to s let us denote by
Ki the intersections of the kernels of the derivations
Dj for
1≤j≤i. Then
Ki is a subfield of E and we have
E=K0⊃K1⊃…⊃Ks−1⊃Ks=I(h). Let i be between 0 and
s−1; then
Ki is stable under
Di+1 because
Di+1 commutes with
D1,…,Di. Moreover we have
Di+1p=Di+1,
Di+1(xi+1)=xi+1=0 and
xi+1∈Ki. Hence Lemma 1 implies that
[Ki:Ki+1]=p, whence finally
[E:K]=[K0:Ks]=ps.
We now come to the proof of the theorem. Let I) ∈L be of dimension s over E and put K=I(h); then [E:K]=ps by Lemma 3, whence [ΩK(E):E]=s by
Th. 2, c) (V, p. 103). By the universal property of the module of differentials the mapping u↦u∘dE/K is an isomorphism of the dual of ΩK(E) onto g(K), hence [g(K):E]=s. Now we have [h:E]=s and h⊂g(K), whence h=g(K), that is h=g(I(h)).
Conversely, for every field K∈C it is clear that g(K) belongs to L (V, p. 103, Th. 2, c)). If x belongs to I(g(K)), we have u(dE/Kx)=0 for each linear form u on ΩK(E), whence dE/Kx=0 and so finally x∈K by Cor. 2 of Prop. 5 (V, p. 102). Thus we have K=I(g(K)).
Bourbaki puts the proof directly after the statement, so what is above is the statement and its proof together.
Nothing.