Bourbaki

Lemma 3

Tag 06RG, permanent. Cite it as [Bourbaki, Tag 06RG].

Algebra, V, p. 105, § 13. p-radical extensions of height _ 1

Let h∈L\mathfrak{h} \in \mathscr{L} be of dimension s over E. Then I(h)I(\mathfrak{h}) belongs to C\mathscr{C} and we have [E:I(h)]=ps[E : I(\mathfrak{h})] = p^s.

It is clear that I(h)I(\mathfrak{h}) is a subfield of EE containing EpE^p. For each x∈Ex \in E let fxf_x be the E-linear form D↦D(x)D \mapsto D(x) on I). Since the intersection of the kcrncls of these linear forms is equal to 0, they generate the vector space dual to h\mathfrak{h} (II, p. 301, Th. 7); hence there exist x1,…,xsx_1, \ldots, x_s in EE such that the linear forms fx1,…,fxsf_{x_1}, \ldots, f_{x_s} form a basis of this dual. Let (Δ1,…,Δs)(\Delta_1, \ldots, \Delta_s) be the basis of h\mathfrak{h} characterized by Δi(xj)=fxj(Δi)=δij\Delta_i(x_j) = f_{x_j}(\Delta_i) = \delta_{ij}. Put Di=xiΔiD_i = x_i \Delta_i, then (D1,…,Ds)(D_1, \ldots, D_s) is a basis of I) over E and we have Di(xj)=xiδijD_i(x_j) = x_i \delta_{ij}. The derivations Dip−DiD_i^p - D_i and [Di,Dj][D_i, D_j] for i,j=1,…,si, j = 1, \ldots, s belong to I) and annihilate x1,…,xsx_1, \ldots, x_s; we thus have

Dip=Di,[Di,Dj]=0 D_i^p = D_i , \quad [D_i, D_j] = 0
For i in the range 0 to s let us denote by KiK_i the intersections of the kernels of the derivations DjD_j for 1≤j≤i1 \leq j \leq i. Then KiK_i is a subfield of E and we have
E=K0⊃K1⊃…⊃Ks−1⊃Ks=I(h). E = K_0 \supset K_1 \supset \ldots \supset K_{s-1} \supset K_s = I(\mathfrak{h}) .
Let i be between 0 and s−1s-1; then KiK_i is stable under Di+1D_{i+1} because Di+1D_{i+1} commutes with D1,…,DiD_1, \ldots, D_i. Moreover we have Di+1p=Di+1D_{i+1}^p = D_{i+1}, Di+1(xi+1)=xi+1≠0D_{i+1}(x_{i+1}) = x_{i+1} \neq 0 and xi+1∈Kix_{i+1} \in K_i. Hence Lemma 1 implies that [Ki:Ki+1]=p[K_i : K_{i+1}] = p, whence finally [E:K]=[K0:Ks]=ps[E : K] = [K_0 : K_s] = p^s.

We now come to the proof of the theorem. Let I) ∈L\in \mathscr{L} be of dimension s over E and put K=I(h)K = I(\mathfrak{h}); then [E:K]=ps[E : K] = p^s by Lemma 3, whence [ΩK(E):E]=s[\Omega_K(E) : E] = s by

Th. 2, c) (V, p. 103). By the universal property of the module of differentials the mapping u↦u∘dE/Ku \mapsto u \circ d_{E/K} is an isomorphism of the dual of ΩK(E)\Omega_K(E) onto g(K)g(K), hence [g(K):E]=s[g(K):E] = s. Now we have [h:E]=s[\mathfrak{h}:E] = s and h⊂g(K)\mathfrak{h} \subset g(K), whence h=g(K)\mathfrak{h} = g(K), that is h=g(I(h))\mathfrak{h} = g(I(\mathfrak{h})).

Conversely, for every field K∈CK \in \mathscr{C} it is clear that g(K)g(K) belongs to L\mathscr{L} (V, p. 103, Th. 2, c)). If xx belongs to I(g(K))I(g(K)), we have u(dE/Kx)=0u(d_{E/K}x) = 0 for each linear form uu on ΩK(E)\Omega_K(E), whence dE/Kx=0d_{E/K}x = 0 and so finally x∈Kx \in K by Cor. 2 of Prop. 5 (V, p. 102). Thus we have K=I(g(K))K = I(g(K)).

Bourbaki puts the proof directly after the statement, so what is above is the statement and its proof together.

Cited by

Nothing.

Cites

Transcribed from the printed edition, 2003, Springer. Not translated.