Bourbaki

Corollary 2

Tag 077P, permanent. Cite it as [Bourbaki, Tag 077P].

Algebra, VIII, p. 102, § 6. Morita Equivalence of Modules and Algebras

Let A and B be Morita equivalent kk-algebras, and let P be an invertible (A,B)k(A,B)_k-bimodule. Every (B,A)k(B,A)_k-bimodule inverse to P is isomorphic to the dual P∗=P^*= HomA(P,A)_A(P,A) of P. More precisely, let Q be a (B,A)k(B,A)_k-bimodule that is an inverse of P, and let λ:P⊗BQ→sAd\lambda : P\otimes_BQ\rightarrow_sA_d be an isomorphism of (A,A)k(A,A)_k-bimodules. There exists a unique mapping τ:Q→P∗\tau : Q\rightarrow P^* determined by the relation ⟨p,τ(q)⟩=λ(p⊗q)\langle p, \tau (q)\rangle =\lambda (p\otimes q) for p∈Pp\in P and q∈Qq\in Q, and τ\tau is an isomorphism of (B,A)k(B,A)_k-bimodules.

The existence and uniqueness of the mapping τ\tau are clear. It is a homomorphism of (B,A)k(B,A)_k-bimodules, and we have λ=Λ∘(1P⊗τ)\lambda = \Lambda \circ (1_P\otimes \tau ). Since λ\lambda and Λ are isomorphisms of (A,A)k(A,A)_k-bimodules (VIII, p. 101, Theorem 1), so is 1P⊗τ1_P\otimes \tau. By Lemma 1, the mapping τ\tau is bijective.

Bourbaki puts the proof directly after the statement, so what is above is the statement and its proof together.

Cited by

Nothing.

Cites

Transcribed from the printed edition, 2023, Springer Nature. Not translated.