Example
Tag 077W, permanent. Cite it as [Bourbaki, Tag 077W].
Topological Vector Spaces, chapter I, § 1. Topological vector spaces
— 1) If is a left vector space over a discrete topological division ring , the discrete topology on is compatible with the vector space structure of (this is not so if is non-discrete and is not the single point 0). 2) Let be a topological ring (GT, III, § 6.3) and let be a subring of that is also a division ring and such that the topology induced on by that of is compatible with the division ring structure of ; then the topology of is compatible with its left vector space structure on . 3) Let be any topological division ring and an arbitrary set. On the product vector space , the product topology is compatible with the vector space structure (GT, III, § 6.4). Or we can say that the space of mappings of in with pointwise or simple convergence topology is a topological vector space on (TG, X, p. 4). 4) Let be a topological space; on the set of finite real-valued continuous functions defined over , the compact convergence topology (GT, X, § 1.3) is compatible with the vector space structure of E on . For, let be a point of E, let H be a compact subset of X and be an arbitrary strictly positive number. The real-valued function is bounded in H ; let ; if is any point of E then for all
Hence, if and for all , then for , , which shows that the axiom (EVT) is satisfied ; similarly it can be verified that the compact convergence topology is compatible with the additive group structure of E.
On the other hand, if X is not compact, the uniform convergence topology (in X) is not necessarily compatible with the vector space structure of E ; for example if and if is an unbounded continuous function in , then the mapping of in E is not continuous in the uniform convergence topology on E.
5) Let E be a vector space of finite dimension over a topological division ring K ; there exists an isomorphism of vector K-spaces and moreover, if is a second isomorphism of on E, then we can write , where is an automorphism of the vector K-space . Consider, on , the product topology that is compatible with its vector space structure (Example 3) ; since every linear mapping of in itself is continuous for this topology, every automorphism of the vector space is bicontinuous. Hence, if we transfer the product topology of to E, by means of any isomorphism whatever of on E, the topology obtained on E is independent of the particular isomorphism used ; we call it the canonical topology on E ; we shall characterize it differently (I, § 1.3) when K is a non-discrete complete division ring with a valuation. Every linear mapping of E in a topological vector space over K is continuous for the canonical topology on E.
In the same way as in def. 1, a right topological vector space over K, a topological division ring, can be defined ; but every right vector space on K can be considered as a left vector space on the division ring opposite to K (A, II, § 1.1) and the topology of K is compatible with the structure of the division ring . For this reason we usually consider only left topological vector spaces ; when we speak of « topological vector space » without qualification, it is to be understood that we refer to a left vector space.
If K' is a sub-division ring of K, and E a topological vector space over K, then it is clear that the topology of E is still compatible with the vector space structure of E relative to K', obtained by restricting the field of scalars to K' ; we say that the topological vector space on K', obtained by this procedure, underlies the topological vector space E on K.
In order that a topological vector space E be Hausdorff, it is necessary and sufficient that for all of E, there exists a neighbourhood of 0 not containing (GT, III, § 1.2).
Consider a topology, on a vector space E over a topological division ring K, that is compatible with the additive group structure of E. Because of the identity
axiom (EVT) is equivalent to the following system of three axioms.
(EVT) For all , the mapping is continuous at .
(EVT) For all , the mapping is continuous at .
(EVT) The mapping is continuous at .
In particular:
Bourbaki puts the proof directly after the statement, so what is above is the statement and its proof together.
Cited by
Nothing.