Bourbaki

Example

Tag 077W, permanent. Cite it as [Bourbaki, Tag 077W].

Topological Vector Spaces, chapter I, § 1. Topological vector spaces

— 1) If EE is a left vector space over a discrete topological division ring K\mathbf{K}, the discrete topology on EE is compatible with the vector space structure of EE (this is not so if K\mathbf{K} is non-discrete and EE is not the single point 0). 2) Let AA be a topological ring (GT, III, § 6.3) and let K\mathbf{K} be a subring of AA that is also a division ring and such that the topology induced on K\mathbf{K} by that of AA is compatible with the division ring structure of K\mathbf{K}; then the topology of AA is compatible with its left vector space structure on K\mathbf{K}. 3) Let K\mathbf{K} be any topological division ring and II an arbitrary set. On the product vector space KsI(A,II,§1.5)K_s^I(A, II, § 1.5), the product topology is compatible with the vector space structure (GT, III, § 6.4). Or we can say that the space KsIK_s^I of mappings of II in K\mathbf{K} with pointwise or simple convergence topology is a topological vector space on K\mathbf{K} (TG, X, p. 4). 4) Let XX be a topological space; on the set E=C(X;R)E = \mathscr{C}(X; \mathbf{R}) of finite real-valued continuous functions defined over XX, the compact convergence topology (GT, X, § 1.3) is compatible with the vector space structure of E on R\mathbf{R}. For, let u0u_0 be a point of E, let H be a compact subset of X and ε\varepsilon be an arbitrary strictly positive number. The real-valued function u0u_0 is bounded in H ; let a=sup⁡t∈H∣u0(t)∣a = \sup_{t \in H} |u_0(t)|; if uu is any point of E then for all t∈Ht \in H

∣λu(t)−λ0u0(t)∣≤∣λ∣⋅∣u(t)−u0(t)∣+a∣λ−λ0∣. |\lambda u(t) - \lambda_0 u_0(t)| \leq |\lambda| \cdot |u(t) - u_0(t)| + a |\lambda - \lambda_0|.

Hence, if ∣λ−λ0∣≤ε|\lambda - \lambda_0| \leq \varepsilon and ∣u(t)−u0(t)∣≤ε|u(t) - u_0(t)| \leq \varepsilon for all t∈Ht \in H, then for t∈Ht \in H, ∣λu(t)−λ0u0(t)∣≤ε(ε+∣λ0∣+a)|\lambda u(t) - \lambda_0 u_0(t)| \leq \varepsilon (\varepsilon + |\lambda_0| + a), which shows that the axiom (EVT) is satisfied ; similarly it can be verified that the compact convergence topology is compatible with the additive group structure of E.

On the other hand, if X is not compact, the uniform convergence topology (in X) is not necessarily compatible with the vector space structure of E ; for example if X=RX = \mathbf{R} and if u0u_0 is an unbounded continuous function in R\mathbf{R}, then the mapping λ↦λu0\lambda \mapsto \lambda u_0 of R\mathbf{R} in E is not continuous in the uniform convergence topology on E.

5) Let E be a vector space of finite dimension nn over a topological division ring K ; there exists an isomorphism u:Ksn→Eu : K_s^n \to E of vector K-spaces and moreover, if vv is a second isomorphism of KsnK_s^n on E, then we can write v=u∘fv = u \circ f, where ff is an automorphism of the vector K-space KsnK_s^n. Consider, on KsnK_s^n, the product topology that is compatible with its vector space structure (Example 3) ; since every linear mapping of KsnK_s^n in itself is continuous for this topology, every automorphism of the vector space KsnK_s^n is bicontinuous. Hence, if we transfer the product topology of KsnK_s^n to E, by means of any isomorphism whatever of KsnK_s^n on E, the topology obtained on E is independent of the particular isomorphism used ; we call it the canonical topology on E ; we shall characterize it differently (I, § 1.3) when K is a non-discrete complete division ring with a valuation. Every linear mapping of E in a topological vector space over K is continuous for the canonical topology on E.

In the same way as in def. 1, a right topological vector space over K, a topological division ring, can be defined ; but every right vector space on K can be considered as a left vector space on the division ring K0K^0 opposite to K (A, II, § 1.1) and the topology of K is compatible with the structure of the division ring K0K^0. For this reason we usually consider only left topological vector spaces ; when we speak of « topological vector space » without qualification, it is to be understood that we refer to a left vector space.

If K' is a sub-division ring of K, and E a topological vector space over K, then it is clear that the topology of E is still compatible with the vector space structure of E relative to K', obtained by restricting the field of scalars to K' ; we say that the topological vector space on K', obtained by this procedure, underlies the topological vector space E on K.

In order that a topological vector space E be Hausdorff, it is necessary and sufficient that for all x≠0x \neq 0 of E, there exists a neighbourhood of 0 not containing xx (GT, III, § 1.2).

Consider a topology, on a vector space E over a topological division ring K, that is compatible with the additive group structure of E. Because of the identity

λx−λ0x0=(λ−λ0)x0+λ0(x−x0)+(λ−λ0)(x−x0) \lambda x - \lambda_0 x_0 = (\lambda - \lambda_0) x_0 + \lambda_0 (x - x_0) + (\lambda - \lambda_0) (x - x_0)

axiom (EVT) is equivalent to the following system of three axioms.

(EVT1′_1') For all x0∈Ex_0 \in E, the mapping λ↦λx0\lambda \mapsto \lambda x_0 is continuous at λ=0\lambda = 0.

(EVT2′_2') For all λ0∈K\lambda_0 \in K, the mapping x↦λ0xx \mapsto \lambda_0 x is continuous at x=0x = 0.

(EVT3′_3') The mapping (λ,x)↦λx(\lambda, x) \mapsto \lambda x is continuous at (0,0)(0, 0).

In particular:

Bourbaki puts the proof directly after the statement, so what is above is the statement and its proof together.

Cited by

Nothing.

Cites

Transcribed from the printed volume. Not translated.