Bourbaki

Lemma 1

Tag 079O, permanent. Cite it as [Bourbaki, Tag 079O].

Topological Vector Spaces, chapter I, § 2. Linear varieties in a topological vector space

— Any compact topological vector space EE over a non-discrete valued division ring, is just the set {0}\{0\}.

Since E is complete we can suppose K is complete (I, p. 6). If E ≠{0}\neq \{0\} then E contains a line that is closed in E (I, p. 14, cor. 1) and therefore compact. This line is isomorphic to KsK_s (I, p. 12, prop. 2) and hence K must be compact. Now the mapping ξ↦∣ξ∣\xi \mapsto |\xi| of K in R\mathbf{R} is continuous and thus the image of K must be bounded, on the other hand there exists γ∈K\gamma \in K with ∣γ∣>1|\gamma| > 1, and the set ∣γn∣=∣γ∣n,n∈N|\gamma^n| = |\gamma|^n, n \in \mathbf{N}, is unbounded. This contradiction shows that E={0}E = \{0\}.

To prove the second assertion in the theorem, if E≠{0}E \neq \{0\} then from the first part of the theorem E is isomorphic to KsnK_s^n with n>0n > 0; now K is complete, hence so is E, and thus E is locally compact. But KsK_s is isomorphic to a line in E (I, p. 12, prop. 2) which is necessarily closed in E (I, p. 14, cor. 1); it follows that K is locally compact.

Bourbaki puts the proof directly after the statement, so what is above is the statement and its proof together.

Cited by

Nothing.

Cites

Transcribed from the printed volume. Not translated.